PHP-Proxy VS ExaProxy

A web proxy script written in PHP and created as an alternative to Glype.

ExaProxy is a a high-performance non-caching proxy.

Easy Setup
PHP-Proxy is relatively easy to set up and deploy, making it accessible for users with basic web development knowledge.
Customizability
It allows developers to customize the proxy according to their specific requirements, including modifying headers and handling specific requests.
Open Source
Being open-source software, PHP-Proxy is free to use and modify, providing flexibility for developers to adapt the code to fit their needs.
Large Community Support
PHP-Proxy has a considerable user base which can provide support through forums and community-driven content.

Performance Limitations
PHP-based proxies might not perform as efficiently as other high-performance proxy solutions, particularly under heavy load.
Security Concerns
Running a proxy server can expose potential security vulnerabilities, especially if the software is not regularly updated or improperly configured.
Lack of Advanced Features
Compared to commercial proxy solutions, PHP-Proxy may lack advanced features such as load balancing, caching, and comprehensive analytics.
Server Dependency
PHP-Proxy requires a server with PHP support, which can limit deployment options and increase costs for hosting and maintenance.

Lightweight
ExaProxy is designed to be lightweight, making it suitable for environments with limited resources where a full-featured proxy might be too demanding.
High Performance
ExaProxy is capable of handling a large number of concurrent connections efficiently, offering high performance for demanding tasks.
Flexible Configuration
ExaProxy provides flexibility in configuration, allowing users to tailor proxy settings to meet specific requirements.
Open Source
Being open source, ExaProxy allows users to inspect, modify, and enhance the code to fit their needs, offering transparency and community-driven support.
Python-based
ExaProxy is written in Python, which makes it accessible to a wide range of developers familiar with the language and allows easy integration with other Python-based systems.

Limited Features
Compared to some other proxies, ExaProxy might lack certain advanced features that are needed in more complex environments.
Community Support
While there is a community around ExaProxy, it may not be as large or active as those of more established proxy solutions, potentially resulting in slower support and fewer resources.
Scalability Concerns
In extreme high-load scenarios, ExaProxy may not scale as effectively as specialized, high-end commercial proxy servers designed for such tasks.
Learning Curve
For users unfamiliar with Python or who lack experience with proxy server configurations, there might be a learning curve associated with deploying and managing ExaProxy.