Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

php eventloop VS Penetrify.cloud

Compare php eventloop VS Penetrify.cloud and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

php eventloop logo php eventloop

a simple non blocking and async event loop written in php

Penetrify.cloud logo Penetrify.cloud

Autonomous AI penetration testing, on every deploy
  • php eventloop Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-27
  • Penetrify.cloud Dashboard penetrify.cloud
    Dashboard penetrify.cloud //
    2026-06-29
  • Penetrify.cloud Report penetrify.cloud
    Report penetrify.cloud //
    2026-06-29

Penetrify replaces the once-a-year manual penetration test with an autonomous AI red team that runs whenever you deploy. Point it at a target and the agent handles the whole engagement itself - reconnaissance, authentication and authorization testing, exploitation, and multi-step attack chaining - returning a clear report with reproduction steps and fixes in minutes, with no security expertise required.

Unlike DAST scanners that only flag known patterns, Penetrify proves what an attacker can actually do, so it catches broken access control, IDOR, SSRF, and business-logic flaws as well as the full OWASP Top 10 and hundreds of other vulnerability classes. It tests web applications, REST and GraphQL APIs, and infrastructure, and plugs into GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and a REST API for continuous coverage.

Designed for developers, founders, and lean security teams, it delivers the output of a $10,000โ€“$50,000 manual pentest as an ongoing subscription from $100/month - five plans up to Enterprise at $5,000/month, with a free trial. Built by a team with 20+ years in production security; founded in 2025 in Brno, Czech Republic.

php eventloop

Website
github.com
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

Penetrify.cloud

$ Details
paid $100 / Monthly (1 penetration test per month)
Platforms
Web SaaS Cloud
Release Date
2025 November
Startup details
Country
Czech Republic
City
Brno
Founder(s)
Viktor Bulanek
Employees
10 - 19

php eventloop features and specs

  • Simple and lightweight
    The library provides a minimalistic implementation of an event loop in PHP, making it easy to understand and integrate into small projects without heavy dependencies.
  • Educational value
    As a straightforward PHP event loop implementation, it serves as a great learning resource for developers wanting to understand how event loops and asynchronous programming concepts work under the hood in PHP.
  • Non-blocking I/O support
    The library enables non-blocking I/O operations in PHP, allowing developers to handle multiple tasks concurrently without relying on multi-threading, which PHP does not natively support well.
  • Timer and periodic task support
    It provides built-in support for timers and periodic tasks, enabling developers to schedule recurring operations or delayed execution within the event loop.
  • Pure PHP implementation
    The library is written in pure PHP without requiring external C extensions, making it portable and easy to install across different PHP environments without special compilation steps.

Possible disadvantages of php eventloop

  • Limited community and support
    The project has a very small community with minimal stars, forks, and contributors on GitHub, which means limited peer support, fewer bug reports, and potentially slower issue resolution.
  • Not production-ready
    Given its small scale and limited adoption, the library may not be battle-tested enough for production environments where reliability, performance, and stability are critical.
  • Limited features compared to alternatives
    More established PHP async libraries like ReactPHP, AmpPHP, and others offer far more comprehensive ecosystems with HTTP servers, database clients, and stream handling that this library lacks.
  • Performance limitations
    Being a pure PHP implementation without leveraging extensions like ev, libuv, or swoole, the event loop may suffer from performance bottlenecks compared to extension-backed alternatives when handling high concurrency.
  • Poor documentation
    The repository has minimal documentation and examples, making it difficult for new users to understand the full API, edge cases, and best practices for using the library effectively.

Penetrify.cloud features and specs

  • Fully autonomous
    runs from a URL, no operator
  • Exploits & chains vulnerabilities
    proof, not just alerts

Analysis of php eventloop

Overall verdict

  • php-eventloop is a lightweight event loop implementation for PHP that provides a solid, minimalistic solution for developers wanting to implement asynchronous, non-blocking behavior without adopting a full framework like ReactPHP or Amp. It's good for learning purposes and simpler use cases, though it lacks the extensive ecosystem, tooling, and production hardening of more established async libraries.

Why this product is good

  • Lightweight and simple to understand, making it easy to integrate into small projects
  • Useful for learning how event loops work under the hood in PHP
  • Minimal dependencies compared to larger async frameworks
  • Open source and available for inspection/modification on GitHub
  • Can be a good starting point for building custom async solutions

Recommended for

  • Developers learning about event-driven programming in PHP
  • Small projects needing basic async functionality without heavy dependencies
  • Educational purposes and understanding event loop internals
  • Prototyping simple non-blocking I/O operations
  • Developers who want full control over a minimal event loop implementation

Analysis of Penetrify.cloud

Overall verdict

  • I don't have verified, specific information about Penetrify.cloud, as it appears to be a lesser-known or possibly new service without substantial independent reviews, security audits, or established reputation data available to me. Before using it, especially for security/penetration testing purposes, thorough independent research is strongly recommended.

Why this product is good

  • Limited public information or third-party reviews are available to verify claims of quality or reliability
  • No verifiable track record, certifications, or client testimonials could be confirmed
  • Security and penetration testing tools require high trust, and unverified providers carry inherent risk
  • Domain and branding suggest a niche cybersecurity tool, but legitimacy and effectiveness are unconfirmed

Recommended for

  • Not recommended without independent verification
  • Users should first check for company transparency, contact information, and business registration
  • Security professionals should look for peer reviews, case studies, or industry recognition before adoption
  • Consider established, well-reviewed alternatives in the penetration testing space unless you can independently verify this service's credibility and safety

php eventloop videos

No php eventloop videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Penetrify.cloud videos

Penetrify.cloud: Create and Run a Security Test for a New Application

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to php eventloop and Penetrify.cloud)
Eventloop
100 100%
0% 0
Security
0 0%
100% 100
PHP
100 100%
0% 0
AI
0 0%
100% 100

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing php eventloop and Penetrify.cloud.

What makes your product unique?

Penetrify.cloud's answer:

Most tools scan - they flag patterns that might be vulnerable. Penetrify exploits: an autonomous AI agent actually attacks the application, chains weaknesses into multi-step attack paths, and proves real impact, the way a human pentester would. It does this from just a URL, with no operator or security expertise needed, and runs continuously on every deploy through your CI/CD pipeline. The result is penetration-test depth - including authorization, IDOR, and business-logic flaws that scanners miss - delivered as an always-on SaaS instead of a once-a-year engagement.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Penetrify.cloud's answer:

  • vs. manual penetration testing: results in minutes instead of 1โ€“3 weeks, from $100/month instead of $10,000โ€“$50,000 per engagement, and continuous on every release instead of once or twice a year.
  • vs. DAST scanners (Burp Suite, Acunetix, OWASP ZAP): Penetrify exploits and chains vulnerabilities rather than only detecting known signatures, so it catches broken access control, IDOR, SSRF, and business-logic flaws those tools typically miss - and it's fully autonomous, requiring no manual operator.
  • vs. other AI security tools: true end-to-end autonomy (URL in, exploit-proven report out), native CI/CD integration, and developer-focused reports with reproduction steps and remediation.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Penetrify.cloud's answer:

Development teams, startups, founders, and SMBs - fast-shipping teams that need continuous security coverage but don't have the budget for repeated manual pentests or an in-house offensive-security specialist. Also DevSecOps engineers who want a real penetration test wired into the build pipeline rather than a periodic audit.

What's the story behind your product?

Penetrify.cloud's answer:

Penetrify was founded in 2025 in Brno, Czech Republic, by Viktor Bulanek (MSc IT Security, 20+ years in security, four-time CTO). After years building and securing production systems, he kept seeing the same gap: startups were priced out of $10kโ€“$50k manual pentests and stuck with once-a-year testing that couldn't keep up with weekly deploys. So the team built an autonomous AI agent that runs the same methodology a senior security engineer would - continuously, and at a price a side project can justify. Penetrify is operated by Algofy s.r.o.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Penetrify.cloud's answer:

Penetrify runs on AWS serverless infrastructure (Lambda, containerized agents, S3, CloudFront). The autonomous testing agents are powered by frontier large language models, including Anthropic's Claude. The backend is a Python/FastAPI API; the web app is built with React and TypeScript.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

Penetrify.cloud's answer:

As a security vendor we keep our customer list confidential - clients generally prefer not to publicize who runs their penetration testing. Penetrify is used primarily by startups, SaaS companies, and software development teams that ship frequently and need continuous security coverage.

User comments

Share your experience with using php eventloop and Penetrify.cloud. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing php eventloop and Penetrify.cloud, you can also consider the following products