Software Alternatives & Startups

Phish Report VS Digraph.dev

Compare Phish Report VS Digraph.dev and see what are their differences

Phish Report

The tools your team need to combat brand impersonation

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source Freemium Free trial $159 / Monthly (Unlimited takedowns)
Digraph.dev

AI marketing platform for brands.

No screenshot yet
Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium Free trial $99 / Monthly
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Phish Report seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 27 times since March 2021.

social mentions
27 vs 0
Cyber Security popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
36 vs 1

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Phish Report
Digraph.dev
Website phish.report digraph.dev
Pricing
Open source Freemium Free trial $159 / Monthly (Unlimited takedowns) Official pricing
Freemium Free trial $99 / Monthly Official pricing
Platforms
Web Browser
—
Company 2021 Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees
Listed in

About Phish Report and Digraph.dev

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Phish Report
Digraph.dev

No description of Phish Report yet.

Digraph is an AI marketing platform for brands. It brings together AI research, market intelligence, website and campaign analysis, specialist AI workflows, and marketer-led guidance to help teams understand what shapes buyer decisions and what to do next. Teams can measure how AI systems...

Read more about Digraph.dev

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Phish Report 4 features
Digraph.dev 5 features
  • User-friendly Interface
    Phish Report provides a simple and easy-to-use interface, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise.
  • Comprehensive Phishing Detection
    The service effectively identifies and reports phishing sites by using a combination of automated systems and user reports, enhancing overall detection accuracy.
  • Community-driven
    It leverages a strong community of users who actively contribute by reporting phishing sites, thus continuously improving the database of known phishing threats.
  • Fast Updates
    Phish Report is regularly updated with new phishing threats, ensuring users have access to the latest information for better protection against scams.

Possible disadvantages

  • Reliance on User Contributions
    The effectiveness of Phish Report heavily depends on user contributions, which can vary in quality and volume, potentially leading to gaps in coverage.
  • False Positives
    As with many anti-phishing tools, there is a risk of false positives, where legitimate sites may be incorrectly flagged as phishing sites, causing inconvenience to users.
  • Limited to Phishing
    While effective for phishing, Phish Report may not address other types of cybersecurity threats, necessitating the use of additional tools for comprehensive protection.
  • Developer-focused positioning
    The .dev domain and branding suggest a tool built for developers and technical teams, so its workflows are likely to fit engineering needs better than a generic product. I could not browse the site, so this is inferred from its positioning rather than confirmed.
  • Graph-based approach
    The name 'Digraph' (directed graph) suggests it models information as connected nodes and relationships. That kind of structure can make dependencies, ideas, or decisions easier to see than flat lists or documents. Confirm how the product actually uses this.
  • Modern, minimal presentation
    Newer developer tools tend to have lean interfaces and a focused feature set, which can mean a short learning curve and less clutter. I could not verify this for Digraph, so check it with a trial.
  • Potential for better organization and clarity
    If the tool works as the name suggests, visualizing relationships between items can improve shared understanding across a team. The benefit depends on how well the product is executed.
  • Early-stage responsiveness
    Smaller or newer products often respond quickly to user feedback and let users influence the roadmap. This is a general tendency and has not been verified for Digraph.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Phish Report
Digraph.dev
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Phish Report and Digraph.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Phish Report 27 mentions
Digraph.dev 0 mentions
  • Pinned: Introduction Thread
    When you see a site you wanna bust, use phish.report to open a case before posting it here for maximum safety. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Keep an eye out for Steam based phishing stuff.
    Https://phish.report/cases/case_d6c45gmbxp1c This phish.report link is to the case I have going against one! Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Call to Action: Fight Back to Scams
    Some will be web forms that you will need to fill out, others will be emails that you will have to send. All of these, phish.report will help you through it. If you have any questions or need help with something, I will try to get to as... Source: over 3 years ago

View more

Tracking Digraph.dev since Oct 2026.

Alternatives to Phish Report and Digraph.dev

When comparing Phish Report and Digraph.dev, you can also consider the following products.