
Harden
Kastra
Suprbox
Decawork
Claude Code
Arcjet
HOL Guard
Stops AI agents before they break something

Automated software dependency project health tracking

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Deadpendency seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | phinq.co | deadpendency.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Phinq yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Phinq and Deadpendency. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking Phinq since Aug 2026.
I created a tiny startup in Haskell which failed RIP. I decided to open source the code though. Source: over 3 years ago
I sometimes stream my Haskell work on deadpendency - https://www.twitch.tv/alistairbuzz. Source: over 5 years ago
When comparing Phinq and Deadpendency, you can also consider the following products.


Runtime authorization for Claude, Cursor, Codex and OpenClaw
Compare Kastra to Phinq or Deadpendency:

Box for AI agents to secure enterprise data storage
Compare Suprbox to Phinq or Deadpendency:

Control your company's internal AI agents and tools
Compare Decawork to Phinq or Deadpendency:

Transform hours of debugging into seconds with a single command. Experience coding at thought-speed with Claude's AI that understands your entire codebase—no more context switching, just breakthrough results.
Compare Claude Code to Phinq or Deadpendency:
