Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Persistent SSH VS Electerm

Compare Persistent SSH VS Electerm and see what are their differences

Persistent SSH logo Persistent SSH

Persistent SSH is SSH tunnel manager for a Windows systems.

Electerm logo Electerm

electerm is a terminal/ssh/sftp client(linux, mac, win) based on electron/ssh2/node-pty/xterm/antd and many other libs
  • Persistent SSH Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-25
  • Electerm Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-23

Persistent SSH features and specs

  • Reliable Connectivity
    Persistent SSH provides a stable and continuous SSH connection, which is beneficial for applications that require uninterrupted connectivity.
  • Session Management
    It offers robust session management features, allowing users to resume their work seamlessly even after network interruptions.
  • Security Features
    The platform incorporates strong encryption and authentication methods, ensuring secure data transmission over SSH connections.
  • Ease of Use
    Persistent SSH is designed to be user-friendly, making it easy for both technical and non-technical users to establish and maintain SSH connections.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    It supports multiple operating systems, providing flexibility and accessibility across different environments.

Possible disadvantages of Persistent SSH

  • Cost
    The service may involve subscription fees or usage costs, which can be a downside for users looking for free alternatives.
  • Complexity for Beginners
    While it is user-friendly, some initial setup and configuration might be complex for users unfamiliar with SSH or networking concepts.
  • Internet Dependency
    The effectiveness of Persistent SSH relies on internet connectivity, which might pose issues in areas with poor network infrastructure.
  • Limited Features Compared to Alternatives
    Some alternatives might offer more comprehensive features or integrations that are not available with Persistent SSH.
  • Potential Security Risks if Misconfigured
    If not properly configured, there may be security vulnerabilities that could be exploited by malicious actors.

Electerm features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Electerm is available for Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it accessible for users on different operating systems.
  • Multi-Protocol Support
    It supports multiple protocols including SSH, SFTP, and Serial, providing flexibility for connecting to different types of servers and devices.
  • Tabbed Interface
    The application allows for multiple sessions in a single window using tabs, which enhances multitasking and organization.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Electerm offers a modern and intuitive user interface, making it easy for both new and experienced users to navigate.
  • Integrated File Transfer
    With built-in SFTP support, users can easily upload and download files within the same application without needing external tools.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, the software provides transparency, and the community can contribute to its development and improvement.

Possible disadvantages of Electerm

  • Resource Intensive
    Electerm can be more resource-intensive compared to some other terminal emulators, which may affect performance on lower-end systems.
  • Limited Customization
    While it offers a range of features, the level of customization available may not meet the needs of all advanced users who prefer highly tailored setups.
  • Reliance on Electron
    Being an Electron-based application, it inherits the limitations of Electron, such as potentially larger installation sizes and performance overhead.
  • Less Mature Compared to Alternatives
    Compared to some other established terminal emulators, Electerm may lack the maturity and extensive track record, which some users prefer for stability.
  • Community Support
    As a less widespread software, the user community and available support might be limited compared to more popular terminal utilities.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Persistent SSH and Electerm)
SSH
44 44%
56% 56
Network & Admin
100 100%
0% 0
Server Management
0 0%
100% 100
Security & Privacy
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Persistent SSH and Electerm. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Persistent SSH seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Persistent SSH mentions (1)

  • ssh tunneling
    KiTTy (A PuTTy derivative) has support for SSH-tunnels build-in. If you like the results then you can use something like persistant SSH tunnels (or a FOSS alternative) to maintain them. Source: about 5 years ago

Electerm mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Electerm yet. Tracking of Electerm recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Persistent SSH and Electerm, you can also consider the following products

KiTTY - KiTTY is a fork from version 0.70 of PuTTY. It adds extra features to PuTTY.

Konsole - Konsole is a free terminal emulator which is part of KDE Software Compilation.

Console - Console is a Windows console window enhancement.

wezterm - GPU-accelerated cross-platform terminal emulator and multiplexer made with Rust.

MobaXterm - Enhanced terminal for Windows with X11 server, tabbed SSH client, network tools and much more

superconsole - SuperConsole is a software collection based on ConEmu, MSYS2, Mintty, Zsh, Git for Windows, grml-zsh-config, Antigen and agkozak-zsh-theme projects, customized and configured for everyday use.