Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Perimeter 81 VS socketify.py

Compare Perimeter 81 VS socketify.py and see what are their differences

BusinessLOG SOC
A centralized log management and SIEM platform built for compliance, auditing, anomaly detection, and infrastructure visibility. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Perimeter 81 logo Perimeter 81

Simplify secure network, cloud and application access. Perimeter 81โ€™s zero trust Secure Network as a Service and Software-Defined Perimeter technology provide the simplest and highest level of security, for companies of all sizes.

socketify.py logo socketify.py

Maybe the fastest web framework for Python and PyPy
  • Perimeter 81 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-20
  • socketify.py Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-24

Perimeter 81 features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Perimeter 81 offers an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it easy for administrators to manage and configure network security settings without extensive technical knowledge.
  • Cloud-Based Infrastructure
    The platform provides a cloud-based infrastructure, allowing for seamless scalability and flexibility. This is especially beneficial for businesses that need to quickly adapt to changing network requirements.
  • Comprehensive Security Features
    Perimeter 81 includes a wide range of security features such as Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), Firewall as a Service (FWaaS), and Intrusion Prevention System (IPS), enhancing overall network security.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    The service supports multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android, ensuring that users can connect securely from any device.
  • Excellent Customer Support
    Perimeter 81 is known for its responsive and helpful customer support, available 24/7 to assist with any issues or questions.

Possible disadvantages of Perimeter 81

  • Cost
    While Perimeter 81 offers robust features, its pricing can be a bit steep for small to medium-sized businesses, especially when compared to other cloud VPN solutions.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic functionalities are easy to use, some advanced features may require a bit of a learning curve and more in-depth technical knowledge.
  • Limited Customization
    Some users might find the customization options somewhat limited, particularly if they need specific configurations or integrations that are not readily supported.
  • Possible Latency Issues
    Depending on server locations and network conditions, there might be occasional latency issues that could affect the performance of real-time applications.
  • Dependency on Cloud Services
    Being a cloud-based solution, Perimeter 81 is dependent on cloud service availability. Any downtime or disruptions in the cloud service could impact the effectiveness of the security features.

socketify.py features and specs

  • High Performance
    Socketify.py is designed for high scalability and performance, leveraging an efficient event loop and native extensions to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently.
  • WebSocket Support
    The library provides built-in support for WebSockets, making it suitable for real-time applications where persistent connections between client and server are necessary.
  • Asynchronous I/O
    Socketify.py is built on top of asynchronous I/O paradigms, allowing non-blocking operations that can improve the throughput of networked applications.
  • Ease of Use
    The library offers a clean and straightforward API with examples and documentation, which lowers the barrier to entry for developers who are new to network programming in Python.
  • Python Integration
    Being a Python library, socketify.py integrates well with existing Python applications and can be included as part of larger, multi-component systems.

Possible disadvantages of socketify.py

  • Limited Adoption
    As a relatively new or niche library, socketify.py might have a smaller user base and community compared to more established frameworks like Flask or Django, which could result in fewer community resources and third-party integrations.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers who are accustomed to synchronous programming paradigms, adapting to the asynchronous programming model of socketify.py may require an initial learning investment.
  • Documentation Depth
    While there is documentation, it might not be as extensive or comprehensive as those of more mature libraries, potentially requiring more experimentation or source code reading to fully grasp advanced features.
  • Potential Stability Issues
    Being less established, there might be undiscovered bugs or stability issues in production environments compared to long-standing Python networking libraries.
  • Ecosystem Limitations
    The library might lack some of the extensive third-party plugins or tools available in more popular frameworks, which could limit its extensibility.

Analysis of Perimeter 81

Overall verdict

  • Perimeter 81 is a strong choice for organizations looking to enhance their network security posture, especially those with remote workforces. Its ease of use, scalability, and comprehensive feature set make it a favorable option for modern enterprises.

Why this product is good

  • Perimeter 81 is considered a good choice for network security because it offers a cloud-based, user-friendly approach to secure remote access. It integrates well with existing infrastructure, facilitating seamless connectivity for remote workers. The service includes features such as Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), Firewall as a Service (FWaaS), and user-friendly configuration. It also provides robust security protocols, continuous monitoring, and analytics to ensure comprehensive protection and compliance with industry standards.

Recommended for

  • Small to medium-sized businesses looking for scalable network security solutions.
  • Enterprises with remote or distributed workforces needing secure access management.
  • Organizations that require a simplified, centralized approach to network security.

Analysis of socketify.py

Overall verdict

  • Socketify.py is a solid choice for developers seeking a high-performance web framework in Python, particularly for I/O-bound applications requiring speed comparable to frameworks in compiled languages, thanks to its use of uWebSockets under the hood.

Why this product is good

  • Built on uWebSockets, providing significant performance improvements over traditional Python web frameworks
  • Supports WebSockets natively, making it suitable for real-time applications
  • Lightweight and minimalistic design reduces overhead
  • Compatible with ASGI, allowing integration with existing Python async ecosystem
  • Active development and growing community support on GitHub
  • Good for building high-throughput APIs and services

Recommended for

  • Developers building real-time applications like chat apps or live notifications
  • Projects requiring high concurrency and low latency in Python
  • Teams looking to replace slower WSGI-based frameworks with something faster
  • Applications needing WebSocket support without heavy framework overhead
  • Microservices architectures where performance is critical
  • Python developers wanting an alternative to Node.js for performance-sensitive tasks

Perimeter 81 videos

+ Add

Perimeter 81 VPN Review 2018 โ€“ Best VPN for Business

More videos:

  • Review - Co-founder & CPO Sagi Gidali Explains Perimeter 81
  • Tutorial - How to Create Your Custom Network - Perimeter 81

socketify.py videos

No socketify.py videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Perimeter 81 and socketify.py)

Perimeter 81

socketify.py

Security & Privacy
100 100%
Security & Privacy
0% 0
Python
0 0%
Python
100% 100
Identity And Access Management
100 100%
Identity And Access Management
0% 0
Web Development
0 0%
Web Development
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Perimeter 81 and socketify.py. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Perimeter 81 and socketify.py

Perimeter 81 Reviews

The top 10 alternatives to OpenVPN
Price: Perimeter 81 offers four pricing plans: Essentials ($8 per user per month + $40 per month gateway), Premium ($12 per user per month + $40 per month per gateway), Premium Plus ($16 per user per month + $40 per month per gateway), and Enterprise (custom pricing).
Source: www.twingate.com
25 Best TeamViewer Alternative Software (Free/Paid) in 2021
Perimeter 81 is software that enables you to securely access the network with ease. It allows employees to connect with multiple devices from various locations. This software can encrypt transmitted data with ease.
Source: www.guru99.com

socketify.py Reviews

We have no reviews of socketify.py yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, socketify.py seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Perimeter 81 mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Perimeter 81 yet. Tracking of Perimeter 81 recommendations started around Mar 2021.

socketify.py mentions (2)

  • Show HN: Python framework is faster than Golang Fiber
    These "benchmarks" are useless, they're not testing anything real world except the performance of uWebsockets. There are copy errors all over the place. And then an advertisement: https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py#briefcase-comme... Is this a professional framework that produces proper, real-world benchmarks and... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • This is how I started the development of the fastest ASGI and WSGI Server in TechEmPower Benchmarks
    After starting the project called socketify.py at https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py, I got pretty good results and reviews, but many people asked if socketify.py could be used to create a WSGI and ASGI server. WSGI and ASGI have a lot of overhead, that's is why I choose not to use them in the first place, but adding an ASGI and WSGI server allows a lot of code already written to run faster! Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Perimeter 81 and socketify.py, you can also consider the following products

Trend Micro Cloud App Security - Trend Micro Cloud App Security delivers advanced threat and data protection for Office 365 and cloud file-sharing services.

Microsoft Cloud App Security - Microsoft Cloud App Security provides deeper visibility, comprehensive controls, and enhanced protection against cloud security issues.

Duo Security - Duo Security provides cloud-based two-factor authentication. Duoโ€™s technology can be deployed to protect users, data, and applications from breaches, credential theft, and account takeover.

Okta - Enterprise-grade identity management for all your apps, users & devices

CipherCloud - CipherCloud provides cloud information protection solutions for enterprises to encrypt sensitive information and store them in the cloud.

BetterCloud - BetterCloud provides critical insights, automated management, and intelligent data security for cloud office platforms.

Loading...