Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Perimeter 81 VS Render

Compare Perimeter 81 VS Render and see what are their differences

Perimeter 81

Simplify secure network, cloud and application access. Perimeter 81’s zero trust Secure Network as a Service and Software-Defined Perimeter technology provide the simplest and highest level of security, for companies of all sizes.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Rating
5.0 · 1 review
Alternatives Is it good?
Measure.sh
Measure helps mobile teams monitor and fix crashes, ANRs, bugs, and performance issues. The open source alternative to Firebase Crashlytics. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Render seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 507 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 507
Identity And Access Management popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
114 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Perimeter 81
Render
Website perimeter81.com render.com
Pricing
Official pricing
Official pricing
Company Startup from Israel · 50 - 99 employees Startup from the United States
Listed in
Security & Privacy Identity And Access Management Monitoring Tools Security +1
Cloud Infrastructure Cloud Computing Cloud Hosting Web Hosting +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Perimeter 81 5 features
Render 6 features
  • Ease of Use
    Perimeter 81 offers an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it easy for administrators to manage and configure network security settings without extensive technical knowledge.
  • Cloud-Based Infrastructure
    The platform provides a cloud-based infrastructure, allowing for seamless scalability and flexibility. This is especially beneficial for businesses that need to quickly adapt to changing network requirements.
  • Comprehensive Security Features
    Perimeter 81 includes a wide range of security features such as Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), Firewall as a Service (FWaaS), and Intrusion Prevention System (IPS), enhancing overall network security.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    The service supports multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android, ensuring that users can connect securely from any device.
  • Excellent Customer Support
    Perimeter 81 is known for its responsive and helpful customer support, available 24/7 to assist with any issues or questions.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    While Perimeter 81 offers robust features, its pricing can be a bit steep for small to medium-sized businesses, especially when compared to other cloud VPN solutions.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic functionalities are easy to use, some advanced features may require a bit of a learning curve and more in-depth technical knowledge.
  • Limited Customization
    Some users might find the customization options somewhat limited, particularly if they need specific configurations or integrations that are not readily supported.
  • Possible Latency Issues
    Depending on server locations and network conditions, there might be occasional latency issues that could affect the performance of real-time applications.
  • Dependency on Cloud Services
    Being a cloud-based solution, Perimeter 81 is dependent on cloud service availability. Any downtime or disruptions in the cloud service could impact the effectiveness of the security features.
  • Ease of Use
    Render provides an intuitive interface that makes it easy for developers to deploy applications without complex configuration.
  • Automatic Deployments
    Render supports automated deployments from GitHub and GitLab, allowing for continuous deployment workflows.
  • Scalability
    Render offers managed services that can easily scale with your application's needs, from small projects to large-scale deployments.
  • Free Tier
    Render provides a generous free tier, allowing developers to test and deploy small applications without incurring costs.
  • Full-Stack Support
    Render supports deploying web services, static sites, cron jobs, background workers, and more, making it a versatile choice for different types of applications.
  • Managed Databases
    Render offers fully managed PostgreSQL databases, taking care of backups, updates, and scaling, so developers can focus on their applications.

Possible disadvantages

  • Pricing for Large-Scale Applications
    While the free and basic tiers are affordable, the cost can increase significantly for large-scale applications that require extensive resources.
  • Region Availability
    Render's data center options are somewhat limited compared to larger cloud providers, which may be a concern for applications needing global distribution.
  • Limited Customization
    Render abstracts much of the infrastructure management, which limits the ability to fine-tune specific settings and configurations compared to more customizable solutions.
  • Newer Platform
    As a relatively newer platform, Render might lack some of the extensive features and integrations that more established cloud service providers offer.
  • Support
    While Render does offer support, it may not be as robust or responsive as that provided by larger cloud providers, especially for enterprise-level needs.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Perimeter 81
Render

Overall verdict

  • Perimeter 81 is a strong choice for organizations looking to enhance their network security posture, especially those with remote workforces. Its ease of use, scalability, and comprehensive feature set make it a favorable option for modern enterprises.

Why this product is good

  • Perimeter 81 is considered a good choice for network security because it offers a cloud-based, user-friendly approach to secure remote access. It integrates well with existing infrastructure, facilitating seamless connectivity for remote workers. The service includes features such as Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), Firewall as a Service (FWaaS), and user-friendly configuration. It also provides robust security protocols, continuous monitoring, and analytics to ensure comprehensive protection and compliance with industry standards.

Recommended for

  • Small to medium-sized businesses looking for scalable network security solutions.
  • Enterprises with remote or distributed workforces needing secure access management.
  • Organizations that require a simplified, centralized approach to network security.

No analysis of Render yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Perimeter 81 3 videos + Add
Render 1 video + Add

Perimeter 81 VPN Review 2018 – Best VPN for Business

More videos

  • - Co-founder & CPO Sagi Gidali Explains Perimeter 81
  • - How to Create Your Custom Network - Perimeter 81

Scott Tries Render.com Again

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Perimeter 81
Render
100% 100%
Identity And Access Management
0% 0%
0% 0%
Cloud Computing
100% 100%
100% 100%
Monitoring Tools
0% 0%
0% 0%
Cloud Infrastructure
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Perimeter 81 and Render. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Perimeter 81 no reviews yet
Render 5.0 · 1 review

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Perimeter 81 0 mentions
Render 507 mentions

Tracking Perimeter 81 since Mar 2021.

  • Kharcha: a 4B model that reads Indian bank SMS so the money stays on your laptop
    A tiny, private expense ledger for my parent. Paste any Indian bank/UPI SMS, or say "aaj sabzi wale ko 80 diye", and a 4B open-weight model fine-tuned on Tinker turns it into a categorised ledger row The model runs offline on a laptop... - Source: dev.to / about 4 hours ago
  • I generated 207 MCP tools from an OpenAPI spec. Generating them was the easy part.
    I wanted neither, so I built render-useful-mcp: an MCP server for Render where every API tool is generated from Render's own OpenAPI document. All 207 endpoints, no curation. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Seven Free Node.js Hosting Platforms Worth Trying in 2026
    Render offers a free web service tier for Node applications, with 512 MB of memory and 0.1 CPU, that spins down after 15 minutes of inactivity and cold-starts on the next request. Deploys are Git-driven, native runtimes handle most Node... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

View more

Alternatives to Perimeter 81 and Render

When comparing Perimeter 81 and Render, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...