Software Alternatives & Startups

Perimeter 81 VS cppcryptfs

Compare Perimeter 81 VS cppcryptfs and see what are their differences

Perimeter 81 logo Perimeter 81

Simplify secure network, cloud and application access. Perimeter 81’s zero trust Secure Network as a Service and Software-Defined Perimeter technology provide the simplest and highest level of security, for companies of all sizes.

cppcryptfs logo cppcryptfs

verion of gocryptfs for windows
  • Perimeter 81 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-20
  • cppcryptfs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-26

Perimeter 81 features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Perimeter 81 offers an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it easy for administrators to manage and configure network security settings without extensive technical knowledge.
  • Cloud-Based Infrastructure
    The platform provides a cloud-based infrastructure, allowing for seamless scalability and flexibility. This is especially beneficial for businesses that need to quickly adapt to changing network requirements.
  • Comprehensive Security Features
    Perimeter 81 includes a wide range of security features such as Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), Firewall as a Service (FWaaS), and Intrusion Prevention System (IPS), enhancing overall network security.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    The service supports multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android, ensuring that users can connect securely from any device.
  • Excellent Customer Support
    Perimeter 81 is known for its responsive and helpful customer support, available 24/7 to assist with any issues or questions.

Possible disadvantages of Perimeter 81

  • Cost
    While Perimeter 81 offers robust features, its pricing can be a bit steep for small to medium-sized businesses, especially when compared to other cloud VPN solutions.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic functionalities are easy to use, some advanced features may require a bit of a learning curve and more in-depth technical knowledge.
  • Limited Customization
    Some users might find the customization options somewhat limited, particularly if they need specific configurations or integrations that are not readily supported.
  • Possible Latency Issues
    Depending on server locations and network conditions, there might be occasional latency issues that could affect the performance of real-time applications.
  • Dependency on Cloud Services
    Being a cloud-based solution, Perimeter 81 is dependent on cloud service availability. Any downtime or disruptions in the cloud service could impact the effectiveness of the security features.

cppcryptfs features and specs

  • Open Source
    cppcryptfs is open-source software, allowing users to review, modify, and contribute to its codebase, enhancing transparency and trust.
  • Integration
    It integrates with Windows seamlessly as it is designed to provide a virtual file system layer, making it user-friendly for people familiar with Windows environments.
  • Encryption
    Offers strong encryption using the underlying Cryptographic File System (CFS) technology, ensuring files are securely protected.
  • Portability
    Encrypted files can be easily transported and accessed on other systems running cppcryptfs, providing flexibility in usage.
  • Performance
    Efficient in terms of performance, as it encrypts files on-the-fly without substantial overhead, maintaining system responsiveness.

Possible disadvantages of cppcryptfs

  • Platform Limitation
    Primarily designed for Windows, which may limit usage for those looking for multi-platform solutions.
  • Complexity
    While aimed at being user-friendly, setting up and managing encrypted volumes may still require a learning curve for non-technical users.
  • Dependency
    Depends on other systems like Dokan for mounting the encrypted file systems, which could complicate installation and compatibility.
  • Support
    As with many open-source projects, support is mainly community-driven, which might not meet the needs of users requiring professional support services.
  • Maintenance
    The reliance on open-source contributors for updates and maintenance may lead to slower response times for bug fixes and new features.

Analysis of Perimeter 81

Overall verdict

  • Perimeter 81 is a strong choice for organizations looking to enhance their network security posture, especially those with remote workforces. Its ease of use, scalability, and comprehensive feature set make it a favorable option for modern enterprises.

Why this product is good

  • Perimeter 81 is considered a good choice for network security because it offers a cloud-based, user-friendly approach to secure remote access. It integrates well with existing infrastructure, facilitating seamless connectivity for remote workers. The service includes features such as Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), Firewall as a Service (FWaaS), and user-friendly configuration. It also provides robust security protocols, continuous monitoring, and analytics to ensure comprehensive protection and compliance with industry standards.

Recommended for

  • Small to medium-sized businesses looking for scalable network security solutions.
  • Enterprises with remote or distributed workforces needing secure access management.
  • Organizations that require a simplified, centralized approach to network security.

Perimeter 81 videos

Perimeter 81 VPN Review 2018 – Best VPN for Business

More videos:

  • Review - Co-founder & CPO Sagi Gidali Explains Perimeter 81
  • Tutorial - How to Create Your Custom Network - Perimeter 81

cppcryptfs videos

No cppcryptfs videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Perimeter 81 and cppcryptfs)
Identity And Access Management
Security & Privacy
42 42%
58% 58
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
File Encryption
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Perimeter 81 and cppcryptfs. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Perimeter 81 and cppcryptfs

Perimeter 81 Reviews

The top 10 alternatives to OpenVPN
Price: Perimeter 81 offers four pricing plans: Essentials ($8 per user per month + $40 per month gateway), Premium ($12 per user per month + $40 per month per gateway), Premium Plus ($16 per user per month + $40 per month per gateway), and Enterprise (custom pricing).
25 Best TeamViewer Alternative Software (Free/Paid) in 2021
Perimeter 81 is software that enables you to securely access the network with ease. It allows employees to connect with multiple devices from various locations. This software can encrypt transmitted data with ease.
Source: www.guru99.com

cppcryptfs Reviews

We have no reviews of cppcryptfs yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, cppcryptfs seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Perimeter 81 mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Perimeter 81 yet. Tracking of Perimeter 81 recommendations started around Mar 2021.

cppcryptfs mentions (8)

  • v1.7.4-x64 (Windows) Corrupts Word Documents - Use Caution - Data loss on editing / saving any document.
    Https://github.com/bailey27/cppcryptfs with dokan and I’ve not had a single issue for a year. I use it with Google drive and iCloud Drive it’s amazing. Source: over 3 years ago
  • What do you guys use for all your personal info?
    There's cppcryptfs & securefs as Cryptomator alternatives too. SiriKali is an option for a GUI that works nicely with them. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Dropbox deletes Rick and Morty creators account for secret TOS violation
    Hmmm... I largely use https://github.com/bailey27/cppcryptfs with dropbox? This would essentially eliminate any possibility of violating any terms of service as far as I can tell? I'm not too comfortable putting any files on dropbox without some sort of encryption fwiw, I've found that cppcryptfs is one of the better implementations of that sort though most (if not all) use the same library which seems to choke on... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
  • File Encryption Software PC (not vault)
    Didn't understand your question but see https://github.com/bailey27/cppcryptfs. Source: over 4 years ago
  • Google Drive Encryption - Windows Alternatives
    Not sure if you can use Google Drive as a folder (I can do that in Linux). If you can then cppcryptfs (Windows version of gocryptfs) would work. I use it in Linux for Dropbox and GDrive. Source: over 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Perimeter 81 and cppcryptfs, you can also consider the following products

Trend Micro Cloud App Security - Trend Micro Cloud App Security delivers advanced threat and data protection for Office 365 and cloud file-sharing services.

Cryptomator - When it comes to saving your files on a cloud server, it is important to ensure the security of those files. Keeping your delicate files out of the wrong hands can save you a lot of time and hassle. Read more about Cryptomator.

Microsoft Cloud App Security - Microsoft Cloud App Security provides deeper visibility, comprehensive controls, and enhanced protection against cloud security issues.

gocryptfs - modernlized encfs by a maintainer of encfs

Duo Security - Duo Security provides cloud-based two-factor authentication. Duo’s technology can be deployed to protect users, data, and applications from breaches, credential theft, and account takeover.

TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt is a leading cross-platform that provides encryption tools that allow you to migrate any encrypted data to virtual disks images on your systems.