PCalc VS cppq

• Feature-Rich
  PCalc offers a wide range of features including unit conversions, scientific calculations, and programmable functions, making it a versatile tool for both basic and advanced calculations.
• User-Friendly Interface
  The app has an intuitive and customizable interface, which enhances usability for both beginners and advanced users. This includes customizable layouts and themes.
• Cross-Platform Availability
  PCalc is available on a variety of Apple devices including iPhone, iPad, and Mac, allowing seamless integration and usage across different platforms.
• Regular Updates
  The application receives frequent updates, ensuring it stays current with the latest device features and operating systems.
• Apple Watch Support
  PCalc offers a dedicated app for Apple Watch, allowing quick calculations directly from the wrist, which adds convenience for users on the go.

Possible disadvantages

• Price
  PCalc is a paid application, which might be a downside for users looking for a free calculator app, especially when basic calculators are available for free.
• Complex Functionality for Basic Users
  While its range of features is a benefit for power users, the complexity of some functions may overwhelm those who only need a basic calculator.
• iOS Exclusive
  PCalc is primarily designed for Apple devices, limiting its availability for users on other operating systems such as Android or Windows.
• Limited Free Version
  The free version of PCalc is very limited in functionality, which might require most users to purchase the full version to avail all features.

• Lightweight C++ implementation
  cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
• Redis-backed reliability
  Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
• Inspired by proven design (asynq)
  The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
• Native integration for C++ projects
  For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
• Open source and inspectable
  Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited maturity and battle-testing
  Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
• Smaller community and ecosystem
  Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
• Documentation gaps
  As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
• C++ build and dependency complexity
  Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
• Fewer built-in features and tooling
  cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.

James Thomson of PCalc and DragThing - iOS Today 411

More videos

No cppq videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• Ask HN: Should there be new RPN calculators to replace the TI-84?

  I think there may be some confusion about "RPN" (Reverse Polish Notation). It was very popular with certain folks, Back In The Day, but I, personally, never warmed to it. But if you really want it, and are an Apple... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• UI is hell: four-function calculators

  I’ve been using PCalc, since last century. https://pcalc.com/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

• Ask HN: Do you still use a hand held/desktop calculator?

  Not sure if you need graphing support but if not, for iOS/Mac I often hear people recommending PCalc: https://pcalc.com. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

View more

Tracking cppq since Nov 2022.