
One-Time Secret
1ty.me
Password Pusher
scrt.link
Yopass
nohistory.fyi
Burn After Reading
Securely send and receive secrets using a one-time link. The secret is encrypted and decrypted in the browser using an encryption key only known by the user. Has features like notifications, teams, API. Trusted by IT teams all around the world.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Password.link seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
CT
CacheThis
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | password.link | cachethis.ct.ws |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

No analysis of Password.link yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Share your experience with using Password.link and CacheThis. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Keeper Security is an alternative that works with company SSO. Otherwise use a one time service like https://password.link/. Source: over 4 years ago
Tracking CacheThis since Jan 2026.
When comparing Password.link and CacheThis, you can also consider the following products.

One-Time Secret is a way to share sensitive information simple and secure.
Compare One-Time Secret to Password.link or CacheThis:

Pastebin.com is a website where you can store text for a certain period of time.
Compare Pastebin.com to Password.link or CacheThis:

If you need to send a password or some other form of simple but sensitive information to someone...
Compare 1ty.me to Password.link or CacheThis:

Gist is a simple way to share snippets and pastes with others.
Compare GitHub Gist to Password.link or CacheThis:

Go Ahead. Email Another Password.
Compare Password Pusher to Password.link or CacheThis:
