Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

paru VS Micro

Compare paru VS Micro and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

paru logo paru

An AUR helper written in Rust and based on the design of yay. It aims to be your standard pacman wrapping AUR helper with minimal interaction.

Micro logo Micro

Modern terminal-based text editor
  • paru Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-02-16
  • Micro Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-12-16

paru features and specs

  • AUR Helper
    Paru is an AUR helper, which means it simplifies the process of searching, installing, and upgrading packages from the Arch User Repository.
  • Features Rich
    Paru offers rich features including dependency resolution, conflict detection, and parallel downloads, enhancing the overall package management experience.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Designed with a focus on usability, Paru provides an intuitive and user-friendly command-line interface for managing packages.
  • Active Development
    Paru is actively developed and maintained, ensuring regular updates and prompt responses to issues and feature requests.
  • Built-in AUR Interactive Mode
    It offers an interactive mode for reviewing PKGBUILDs before installation, ensuring transparency and control over what gets installed.

Possible disadvantages of paru

  • Arch-Specific
    Paru is specific to Arch Linux and its derivatives, which limits its usability to this subset of Linux distributions.
  • Command-Line Interface
    As a command-line tool, it may not be suitable for users who prefer graphical interfaces or are unfamiliar with terminal commands.
  • AUR Risks
    Installing packages from the AUR can pose security and stability risks as these packages are user-submitted and not officially vetted.
  • Learning Curve
    For new users, there might be a learning curve associated with understanding and using Paru effectively, especially if they are new to Arch Linux.
  • Dependency Management Complexity
    Handling complex dependencies for certain packages might require manual intervention and understanding of the system's package management.

Micro features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Micro provides an intuitive interface that is easy to navigate even for beginners, making it accessible for new users.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Micro is available on multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, ensuring compatibility across various platforms.
  • Lightweight
    The editor is lightweight and fast, which contributes to a smooth and responsive user experience without consuming significant system resources.
  • Plugin System
    Micro supports plugins, allowing users to extend the editor's functionality to suit their specific needs.
  • Built-in Terminal
    It includes a built-in terminal that enables users to execute commands without leaving the editor environment.
  • Syntax Highlighting
    Micro provides syntax highlighting for many programming languages, enhancing code readability.

Possible disadvantages of Micro

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more established editors like VSCode or Sublime Text, Micro may lack some advanced features and integrations.
  • Less Community Support
    The user community around Micro is smaller compared to that of other text editors, which may result in fewer available resources like plugins, themes, or tutorials.
  • Infrequent Updates
    Updates and new features may be released less frequently, as it is not as widely maintained as more mainstream editors.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Use
    While basic operations are straightforward, some advanced features and customizations may require a learning curve.
  • Limited Built-in Features
    Although plugins can extend its functionality, out of the box, Micro may not have all the built-in features that other editors offer.

Analysis of Micro

Overall verdict

  • Micro is a good choice for users who want a lightweight, efficient, and modern text editor within the terminal. It offers enough features for daily text editing tasks while remaining easy to use and configure.

Why this product is good

  • Micro is a terminal-based text editor that offers a balance between simplicity and functionality. It provides intuitive keyboard shortcuts, plugin support, and syntax highlighting, which make it a convenient choice for both beginners and experienced users seeking an easy-to-use and fast text editing experience within the command line. Furthermore, its modern user interface and ability to be extended with Lua plugins make it adaptable to various workflows.

Recommended for

    Micro is recommended for developers, system administrators, and anyone who frequently works within a terminal environment and needs a straightforward yet powerful text editor. It's particularly suitable for those who are looking for a simpler alternative to more complex editors like Vim or Emacs.

paru videos

Attention Arch Users! Replace 'Yay' With 'Paru'.

More videos:

  • Review - Arch Linux: The Paru AUR Helper
  • Review - เฐจเฑเฐตเฑเฐตเฑ เฐฎเฑŠ**เฐฒเฑ‹ Questions เฐ…เฐกเฐ—เฐ•เฑ เฐฆเฐตเฐก เฐฎเฑ€เฐฆ เฐฆเฑ†เฐ‚**| Laila Paru Interview | Tiktok StarS interviewS | IB9TV

Micro videos

Microeconomics- Everything You Need to Know

More videos:

  • Review - MICROeconomics 19 Minute Review
  • Review - Game Gear Micro Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to paru and Micro)
Work Music
100 100%
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
100% 100
Focus Music
100 100%
0% 0
IDE
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using paru and Micro. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Micro should be more popular than paru. It has been mentiond 88 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

paru mentions (12)

  • My First Arch Linux Installation
    But you can also choose another one (like paru which is written in Rust), or if you're really going in Arch Linux way, get familiar with the manual build process. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • switch from nouveau to 390xx drivers xorg
    Next compile / install the AUR package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nvidia-390xx-dkms - I'd recommend using a helper app like paru to help installing updates for it easier. Reboot and the nvidia v390 kernel module should have loaded. Source: about 3 years ago
  • What goes into maintaining an Arch system?
    Many users also use an AUR helper, which makes it easier to install and upgrade packages from the AUR. Yay and paru are the most popular. Source: about 4 years ago
  • How can I add aur in an arm arch Linux, is it with the same paru-bin located at https://aur.archlinux.org/paru-bin.git ????
    Paru-bin provides binaries for x86_64 and aarch64. If your device is not aarch64, you'll have to build paru from source. Source: about 4 years ago
  • any solution for checkupdates-aur
    I use paru as my aur helper. It uses the same flags pacman does with additional ones if you want to handle only aur updates instead of both pacman packages + aur. Source: over 4 years ago
View more

Micro mentions (88)

  • Show HN: Deff โ€“ side-by-side Git diff review in your terminal
    Micro editor is a great choice as well imo but I don't think that micro has the thriving plugin ecosystem as compared to neovim but it is possible to make plugins for micro editor as well https://github.com/micro-editor/plugin-channel Link to Micro editor: https://micro-editor.github.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Claude Code Is Being Dumbed Down
    If you are talking about agents I feel like opencode has gotten pretty good UI/UX If you are talking about a CLI editor, then micro has hit the nail on quality UX https://micro-editor.github.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Customize Nano Text Editor
    I tend to use micro[0] on most of my systems now just because it comes with really lovely defaults and keybindings that are a bit more familiar, but this might make me take a second look at nano in future. [0] https://micro-editor.github.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Why Nextcloud feels slow to use
    I have tried to run micro https://micro-editor.github.io/ on my phone but this is some other beast if someone is running tmux and vim on their phone I have found that typing normally is really preferably on android and usually I didn't like having to press columns or ctrl or anything so as such since micro is really just such a great thing overall, it fit so perfectly that when I had that device, I was coding more... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Libghostty Is Coming
    You literally, and I mean literally read my mind dear random stranger down to the wording. Micro is definitely underrated. Micro is a truly goated software. I mean, it can genuinely replace vscode for small scale editing in the context of shopify that the parent comment was referring to. https://micro-editor.github.io/ It also helped me in physics when I had to remember the units like 10^-6 being micro, 10^-9... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing paru and Micro, you can also consider the following products

Yay - Yay is an AUR helper written in go, based on the design of yaourt, apacman and pacaur.

VS Code - Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft

pikaur - AUR helper with minimal dependencies. Review PKGBUILDs all in once, next build them all without user interaction.Inspired by pacaur, yaourt and yay.

fzf - A command-line fuzzy finder written in Go

Trizen - Trizen AUR Package Manager: A lightweight wrapper for AUR.

fd - A simple, fast and user-friendly alternative to 'find'.