Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Parcel VS CocoaPods

Compare Parcel VS CocoaPods and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Parcel logo Parcel

Blazing fast, zero configuration web application bundler

CocoaPods logo CocoaPods

The Dependency Manager for iOS & Mac projects
  • Parcel Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-13
  • CocoaPods Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-08-23

Parcel features and specs

  • Zero Configuration
    Parcel requires minimal to no configuration to get started, making it extremely user-friendly, especially for beginners or small projects.
  • Fast Bundling
    Parcel uses worker threads to parallelize tasks, which significantly speeds up the bundling process compared to other bundlers that do not use this approach.
  • Out-of-the-box support for many file types
    Parcel supports many file types (e.g., JavaScript, CSS, HTML, images) right out-of-the-box without needing additional plugins or configurations.
  • Hot Module Replacement (HMR)
    Parcel offers built-in HMR, allowing developers to see changes in real-time without needing to refresh the browser, leading to a faster development cycle.
  • Tree Shaking
    Parcel automatically performs tree shaking, removing unused code from the production build to reduce file sizes, which can improve loading times.
  • Code Splitting
    Parcel has automatic code splitting capabilities which help to improve performance by loading only the necessary assets.
  • Extensible via Plugins
    Parcel’s plugin system allows developers to extend its functionality easily if custom or additional features are needed.

Possible disadvantages of Parcel

  • Community and Ecosystem
    The community and ecosystem around Parcel are smaller compared to other bundlers like Webpack, so finding solutions and third-party plugins might be more challenging.
  • Limited Customization
    While the zero-config aspect is beneficial, it also means there are fewer customization options out-of-the-box, which might be limiting for complex projects needing specific configurations.
  • Performance with Large Projects
    For very large projects, Parcel's performance can become a bottleneck, particularly when it comes to initial build times.
  • Documentation
    The documentation, while improving, is not as comprehensive as some other tools, making it harder for developers to find detailed information when they encounter issues.
  • Dependency Bloat
    Parcel can sometimes include more dependencies than necessary in the final bundle, potentially increasing the final bundle size.

CocoaPods features and specs

  • Dependency Management
    CocoaPods simplifies the management of third-party library dependencies, helping developers integrate and manage multiple libraries effortlessly.
  • Community Support
    It has a large, active community, providing a wide range of libraries, regular updates, and community-driven support.
  • Ease of Use
    With simple commands, CocoaPods automates the installation and inclusion of libraries into Xcode projects, saving time and reducing manual errors.
  • Version Control
    CocoaPods allows specifying exact library versions, ensuring consistency across development and production environments.
  • Integration with Xcode
    It integrates well with Xcode projects, dynamically creating workspace files to manage dependencies without altering original project files.

Possible disadvantages of CocoaPods

  • Learning Curve
    New users might find it challenging to learn CocoaPods’s setup, configuration, and troubleshooting, particularly in complex projects.
  • Dependency Resolution
    There can be conflicts when resolving dependency versions, sometimes requiring manual intervention to fix compatibility issues.
  • Increased Build Times
    Using CocoaPods might increase build times as it generates an additional workspace and schemes that can slow down the build process.
  • Project Complexity
    The automated management changes project structures, moving projects into workspaces, which could complicate direct project handling.
  • Potential for Conflicts
    Due to its nature of managing external dependencies, there’s potential for conflicts with other dependency managers like Carthage or Swift Package Manager.

Analysis of Parcel

Overall verdict

  • Parcel is a good choice for developers looking for a hassle-free, efficient, and beginner-friendly bundler. Its minimal configuration approach and speed make it ideal for small to medium-sized projects. However, for highly complex projects that require intricate and highly customized build processes, other bundlers might be more suitable due to their advanced configuration capabilities.

Why this product is good

  • Parcel is a web application bundler that is appreciated for its simplicity and zero-config philosophy. It automatically detects the files needed for a project without requiring a complex configuration file. Its fast performance is attributed to parallelization and efficient caching. Additionally, Parcel offers out-of-the-box support for JavaScript, CSS, HTML, asset management, and various types of file transformations, making it a versatile tool for web developers.

Recommended for

  • Developers new to module bundlers or looking for an easy-to-setup tool.
  • Projects that value speed and simplicity in their build processes.
  • Developers who need a bundler capable of handling multiple asset types with minimal configuration.
  • Teams that prefer convention over configuration and want to get started quickly without diving deep into complex bundler settings.

Parcel videos

+ Add

Danby Parcel Guard Smart Mailbox blogger Review

More videos:

  • Review - PARCEL MOVIE REVIEW | SASWATA CHATTERJEE | RITUPARNA SENGUPTA | RUPAM'S REVIEW
  • Review - Le Parcel Box review

CocoaPods videos

No CocoaPods videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Parcel and CocoaPods)

Parcel

CocoaPods

Web Application Bundler
100 100%
Web Application Bundler
0% 0
Application And Data
0 0%
Application And Data
100% 100
JS Build Tools
100 100%
JS Build Tools
0% 0
Libraries
0 0%
Libraries
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Parcel and CocoaPods. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Parcel and CocoaPods

Parcel Reviews

Rollup v. Webpack v. Parcel
Parcel's caching feature sees dramatically decreases in time consumption after the initial run. For frequent, small changes, in smaller projects **Parcel*8 is a great choice.
Source: x-team.com
If you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!
document.body.className = document.body.className.replace(/(^|\s)is-noJs(\s|$)/, "$1is-js$2")HomepageHomepageJavascriptBecome a memberSign inGet startedIf you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!And how to hit the ground running with Parcel.Ibrahim ButtBlockedUnblockFollowFollowingMar 16, 2018Click here to share this article on LinkedIn »Zero...
Source: medium.com
First impressions with Parcel JS
The big selling point of Parcel though is that it offers a zero configuration experience. This means all the features are available out of the box! It also boasts blazing fast bundle times 👟 You won’t be configuring how Parcel works or having to draft in various plugins to get started. If you do need something, Parcel magically detects this and will pull in stuff for you on...
Source: codeburst.io
Parcel vs webpack - Jakob Lind
Parcel has made their own benchmarks of Parcel and other bundlers. Parcel has been criticized because they have not made the benchmarks open source. People cannot verify that the benchmarks are true when they are not open source.
Source: blog.jakoblind.no

CocoaPods Reviews

We have no reviews of CocoaPods yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Parcel should be more popular than CocoaPods. It has been mentiond 113 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Parcel mentions (113)

  • Migrating a JavaScript Project from Prettier and ESLint to BiomeJS
    Https://parceljs.org/ is another. It even supports languages like `` out of the box which is pretty cool. IIRC it downloads necessarily plugins on the fly. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Create React App is Deprecated – What’s Next ?
    Parcel is another alternative that requires zero configuration and is super fast. If you want a simple React setup without any hassle, Parcel is a great choice. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Bun 1.2 Is Released
    From its documentation [1] it looks a lot like a parceljs replacement [2], i.e. a zero config bundler which processes and bundles the dependencies in .html pages. So great for simple websites, not for replacing an entire Vite stack. [1] https://bun.sh/docs/bundler/fullstack [2] https://parceljs.org. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • What is Evan You doing by creating VoidZero, and what are the issues with JS toolchains?
    Packagers are the ones we most frequently come into contact with, such as Webpack Vite and Parcel. The latter may not be commonly used, but it is also a well-established tool. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Node.js: A brief history of cjs, bundlers, and esm
    Npm packages dramatically sped up the productivity of developers by being able to leverage other developers' work. However, it had a major disadvantage: cjs was not compatible with web browsers. To solve this problem, the concept of bundlers was born. Browserify was the first bundler which essentially worked by traversing an entry point and "bundling" all the require()-ed code into a single .js file compatible... - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
View more

CocoaPods mentions (16)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Parcel and CocoaPods, you can also consider the following products

Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.

Ubuntu Sources List Generator - Ubuntu Sources List Generator is a website where you can generate a sources.

rollup.js - Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into a larger piece such as application.

OCMapView Alternatives - Simple and easy to use clustering mapView for iOS. Contribute to BotiKis/OCMapView development by creating an account on GitHub.

17track - All-in-one package tracking

zhPopupController Alternatives - Help you pop up custom views easily. and support pop-up animation, layout position, mask effect and gesture interaction etc. - GitHub - snail-z/zhPopupController: Help you pop up custom views easil...

Loading...