
ML5.js
Spell
Lobe
ML Showcase
Apple Machine Learning Journal
Amazon Machine Learning
Machine Learning Playground
The latest in machine learning at your fingerprints

Year/Make/Model fitment search for Shopify. 8 verticals, Smart Parse, and your data in Shopify metaobjects — not a vendor database. Free tier, Pro at $49.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Papers with Code seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 100 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | paperswithcode.com | normalview.pro |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Papers with Code yet.
ViewForge is a Year Make Model (YMM) parts finder for Shopify. Shoppers pick their vehicle, machine or device from cascading dropdowns and see only the parts that fit. Fitment search works across eight verticals — auto, motorcycle, tractor, marine, power equipment, bicycle, printer and...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
The best site for research papers with codes on Machine/Deep Learning | Research paper search
More videos
ViewForge: YMM Search & Filter
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Papers with Code and ViewForge.
ViewForge's answer:
Three things. (1) Data ownership: ViewForge writes fitment as Shopify metaobjects native to your store — most competitors store fitment in their own database. (2) 8 verticals out of the box: auto, motorcycle, tractor, marine, power equipment, bicycle, printer, electronics — most competitors are automotive-only. (3) Smart Parse: extract fitment automatically from your existing product titles and descriptions instead of re-typing everything.
ViewForge's answer:
Data ownership. Fitment lives in your Shopify metaobjects, so uninstalling does not take your compatibility data with it. Convermax, EasySearch and PartFinder all keep it in their own databases, and getting it back depends on their export tooling on the day you cancel.
Cost at the low end. The search widget, the compatibility table on the product page and the saved-vehicle garage are all on the free tier, up to 50 products, with no expiry. EasySearch puts the table and the garage behind its $75/month Premium plan. Convermax starts at $250/month.
Automotive and non-automotive coverage. Eight built-in templates, and fully custom templates from $19/month, for catalogs that do not decompose into Year/Make/Model at all.
ViewForge's answer:
Shopify merchants whose customers need to know whether a part fits before they will buy it — and who do not have an engineer on staff to build that themselves.
Concretely: auto and truck parts retailers, powersports and motorcycle dealers, tractor and agricultural parts sellers, marine and outboard suppliers, small-engine and power equipment stores, bicycle and e-bike component shops, printer supply merchants, and electronics accessory sellers.
Catalog sizes run from a few dozen products on the free tier up into the tens of thousands; it is running in production on a catalog of roughly 40,000 SKUs. The common thread is not the industry — it is that "does this fit my thing" is the question deciding the sale.
ViewForge's answer:
ViewForge came out of agency work. Normal View was building for a parts retailer running roughly 12,000 SKUs who needed fitment search, and every app we evaluated stored the merchant's compatibility data in the vendor's own database.
That is a strange trade when you look at it directly. Fitment data is genuinely expensive to produce — it is weeks of work — and the merchant would not own the result. It would belong to whichever app happened to be installed that year.
Shopify metaobjects made a different answer possible: write fitment as native structured data inside the merchant's own store. The theme reads it, the Storefront API queries it, Admin GraphQL exports it, and it is still there after an uninstall. That decision is what the rest of the app is built around.
Everything else came from real catalogs rather than a roadmap. Eight verticals exist because a tractor catalog is not Year/Make/Model. Smart Parse exists because that retailer had already written fitment into 12,000 product titles, and nobody was ever going to retype them.
ViewForge's answer:
Share your experience with using Papers with Code and ViewForge. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Benchmark Primary focus Evaluation metrics System coverage Usability Link HumaneBench AI benchmark Human well being, humane AI principles HumaneScore, flip tests under adversarial instruction, long term well being 15 popular chat... - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
An helpful approach is to browse the state of the art models in paperswithcode. This will give you an idea of the performance of different models on various tasks. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
I think a way around this would some sort of voting/ popularity system? Papers with code (https://paperswithcode.com/) does this via Github stars sorting. Sure it doesn't mean something is established. But it at least gives some... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Tracking ViewForge since Aug 2026.
When comparing Papers with Code and ViewForge, you can also consider the following products.



Visual tool for building custom deep learning models
Compare Lobe to Papers with Code or ViewForge:

A curated collection of machine learning projects
Compare ML Showcase to Papers with Code or ViewForge:

A blog written by Apple engineers
Compare Apple Machine Learning Journal to Papers with Code or ViewForge:

Machine learning made easy for developers of any skill level
Compare Amazon Machine Learning to Papers with Code or ViewForge: