
Marker.io
Markup.io
Pastel
BugHerd
Ruttl
Usersnap
Userback
Comment on any website or web app. See bugs in the right context with our interactive recordings. Use it with your whole team directly from a browser.

BugHerd
Marker.io
Markup.io
Jam
Bird Eats Bug
Pin Feed
Pinreview.one
Pin feedback on live websites. Clients comment with no account, every pin captures screenshot, console and network context, and opens straight in your coding agent.

Which is more popular?
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | pageshare.dev | layerdock.io |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Company | 2023 | — |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


PageShare is a visual commenting platform that allows you to collaborate with your team on live websites. Instead of relying on screenshots, you can open the website or web app on PageShare and leave pinned comments directly on it. This feature facilitates an effective and efficient communication...
No description of LayerDock yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing PageShare and LayerDock.
LayerDock's answer:
LayerDock sends website feedback straight to your coding agent. Every pin records the screenshot, CSS selector, viewport, console logs and network requests. Through MCP it opens directly in Claude Code or Cursor with all of that attached. Pins also stay attached to the right element after a redeploy, so feedback doesn't get lost when the site changes.
LayerDock's answer:
Tools like BugHerd, Marker.io and MarkUp.io collect feedback. LayerDock also gets it to the fix. Clients review through a share link without making an account, and your team gets developer-ready context on every pin. The pricing is simple too: there's a free plan, Pro is $15/mo and Agency is $39/mo, with no surprise price hikes.
LayerDock's answer:
Agencies, freelancers and software teams who build websites and need design review, QA or client sign-off on the live site. It suits teams where designers, clients and developers all touch the same project, especially developers who already use coding agents like Claude Code or Cursor.
LayerDock's answer:
Before LayerDock, I ran an agency building websites for clients and later worked as a senior product designer, mostly sharing work and collecting client feedback. Feedback always showed up as screenshots in email, vague Slack messages and spreadsheets, and developers had to guess what was meant. My co-founder Adeen and I built LayerDock so feedback lives on the actual page, with all the context a developer needs to fix it.
LayerDock's answer:
Next.js on Vercel for the web app and dashboard, a Manifest V3 Chrome extension with a React overlay, Supabase (Postgres) for the database, Stripe for billing, Resend for email, OpenAI for AI element labeling, and MCP for the coding agent integration.
Share your experience with using PageShare and LayerDock. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
When comparing PageShare and LayerDock, you can also consider the following products.

Visual feedback and bug reporting tool for websites
Compare Marker.io to PageShare or LayerDock:


The easiest way to comment and share feedback on over 30 file types. Sign up for free, upload your content, drop a comment, and share for review. Yep, it’s that simple.
Compare Markup.io to PageShare or LayerDock:

Sticky note-based feedback collection tool for live websites
Compare Pastel to PageShare or LayerDock:

Portable bluetooth speakers that set you and your jams free. Wireless speakers, great sound quality, and totally portable, need we say more?
Compare Jam to PageShare or LayerDock:

ruttl is the fastest website feedback tool to add comments & make edits on live websites & web apps, so that you can give precise change values to your developers. You can also collect feedback from your clients without login or sign-up!
Compare Ruttl to PageShare or LayerDock: