Packer Reviews

usql Reviews

Packer mentions (9)

• Failed to connect to the host via SSH on Ubuntu 22.04

  If you have just upgraded to Ubuntu 22.04, and you suddenly experience either errors when trying to ssh into hosts, or when running ansible or again when running the ansible provisioner building a packer image, this is probably going to be useful for you. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

• Create a minimalist OS using Docker Containers and Hashicorp Packer

  I am already using Hashicorp Packer at work and for personal projects and I wanted to test This idea out by wrapping it a single Packer Template file. This reduces the level of maintaining a lot of small scripts, Dockerfiles and configurations and the user can simply trigger a couple of Commands to get a minimalist OS at the end of the process. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

• After self-hosting my email for twenty-three years I have thrown in the towel. The oligopoly has won.

  And while it is a slight increase in complexity, it can be an overall net gain in functionality, configurability and reliability. Much like Packer is far more reliable and practical than manually making VM images sitting in front of a terminal, even though making the initial configuration takes some time. Source: almost 4 years ago

• Customized Ubuntu Images using Packer + QEMU + Cloud-Init & UEFI bootloading

  Hashicorp Packer provides a nice wrapper / abstraction over the QEMU in order to boot the image and use it to set it up on first-boot. Instead of writing really long commands in order to boot up the image using QEMU, Packer provided a nice Configuration Template in a more Readable fashion. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

• The journey of sharing a wired USB printer over the network

  Packer seemed like the perfect tool for the job. I have never used it before and wanted to get familiar with the tool. It doesn't come with ARM support out of the box, but there are two community projects to fill that niche. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

usql mentions (9)

• Why is database support in every language bad?

  Frameworks / ORM are just specilized database graphical user interface front ends designed to simplify how data is displayed/inputed Database management systems usually provide a way of importing/exporting 'raw' data via sql statement(s) results. Aka cvs, comma delimited, html formatted, json formatted, etc. Aka do command line sql query with 'html formatted output' and open results of file in a brower. Postgres... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• Usql: Universal command-line interface for SQL databases

  It seems to support quite a large number of database drivers. If file size is such a concern you could recompile it with unneeded drivers omitted. https://github.com/xo/usql?tab=readme-ov-file#building. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

• Dblab: Interactive Terminal Client for PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite3 and Oracle

  https://github.com/xo/usql has a similar feel to it, with a variety of backends. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

• From GUI to CLI: Transforming my query workflow with usql and jq

  Since some of the databases I was interacting were postgres, I started to play around with psql. It felt amazing, it had a great integration with the terminal, no visual pollution, I could also use vim as my query editor, and it was blazing fast. The problem was that only some of the databases I was interacting were postgres. I needed something that could connect to multiple databases, something universal, so I... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

• PRQL a simple, powerful, pipelined SQL replacement

  Also all languages has an query-builder / ORM so the benefit of something like PRQL is possibly not big enough to merit it as an additional dependency. My suggestion: Make PRQL a cli tool that can be used by allowing users to connect to a database in a similar fashion as something like usql (https://github.com/xo/usql),. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago