Measure helps mobile teams monitor and fix crashes, ANRs, bugs, and performance issues. The open source alternative to Firebase Crashlytics.
sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Parcel
seems to be a lot more popular than Packer.
While we know about 115 links to Parcel,
we've tracked only 9 mentions of Packer.
social mentions
9 vs 115
DevOps Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
91 vs 112
Base details
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
Multi-Provider Support Packer supports a wide variety of providers such as AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, VMware, and more. This allows for flexibility and the ability to create machine images across different environments.
Automation Packer automates the creation of machine images, eliminating the need for manual image configuration and reducing the potential for human error.
Script Reusability Packer allows for the reuse of scripts and configuration files, enabling a consistent and repeatable process for image creation.
Parallel Builds Packer can build multiple images in parallel, which can significantly speed up the provisioning process.
Idempotency Packer ensures that the output machine image is always an identical result given the same input configuration, reducing the risk of inconsistencies.
Possible disadvantages
Steep Learning Curve The variety of features and flexibility that Packer offers can make it complex and challenging to learn, especially for beginners.
Limited Debugging Tools Packer's debugging tools are not as mature or as integrated as those found in some other DevOps tools, making troubleshooting more difficult.
Configuration Complexity Complex configurations with multiple builders and provisioners can become hard to manage and maintain, leading to potential errors.
No State Management Unlike Terraform, Packer does not manage state, which means users need to handle state management separately if required.
Dependency on External Tools Packer often relies on external scripts and tools for provisioning, which can introduce additional dependencies and complexities.
Zero Configuration Parcel requires minimal to no configuration to get started, making it extremely user-friendly, especially for beginners or small projects.
Fast Bundling Parcel uses worker threads to parallelize tasks, which significantly speeds up the bundling process compared to other bundlers that do not use this approach.
Out-of-the-box support for many file types Parcel supports many file types (e.g., JavaScript, CSS, HTML, images) right out-of-the-box without needing additional plugins or configurations.
Hot Module Replacement (HMR) Parcel offers built-in HMR, allowing developers to see changes in real-time without needing to refresh the browser, leading to a faster development cycle.
Tree Shaking Parcel automatically performs tree shaking, removing unused code from the production build to reduce file sizes, which can improve loading times.
Code Splitting Parcel has automatic code splitting capabilities which help to improve performance by loading only the necessary assets.
Extensible via Plugins Parcel’s plugin system allows developers to extend its functionality easily if custom or additional features are needed.
Possible disadvantages
Community and Ecosystem The community and ecosystem around Parcel are smaller compared to other bundlers like Webpack, so finding solutions and third-party plugins might be more challenging.
Limited Customization While the zero-config aspect is beneficial, it also means there are fewer customization options out-of-the-box, which might be limiting for complex projects needing specific configurations.
Performance with Large Projects For very large projects, Parcel's performance can become a bottleneck, particularly when it comes to initial build times.
Documentation The documentation, while improving, is not as comprehensive as some other tools, making it harder for developers to find detailed information when they encounter issues.
Dependency Bloat Parcel can sometimes include more dependencies than necessary in the final bundle, potentially increasing the final bundle size.
Analysis
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
PackerParcel
Overall verdict
Packer is a valuable tool for organizations looking to streamline their image building process and maintain consistency across different environments. Its flexibility and wide range of features make it a strong asset in infrastructure automation and DevOps pipelines.
Why this product is good
Packer is considered a good tool because it automates the creation of machine images for multiple platforms from a single source configuration. This efficiency reduces errors and speeds up the deployment process. Packer is highly versatile and integrates well with various configuration management tools, broadening its applicability across different environments. It also supports multiple cloud providers, making it a great choice for multi-cloud strategies.
Recommended for
DevOps teams
Cloud infrastructure engineers
Organizations using multi-cloud strategies
Teams seeking automated and consistent image building processes
Developers looking to integrate infrastructure as code practices
Overall verdict
Parcel is a good choice for developers looking for a hassle-free, efficient, and beginner-friendly bundler. Its minimal configuration approach and speed make it ideal for small to medium-sized projects. However, for highly complex projects that require intricate and highly customized build processes, other bundlers might be more suitable due to their advanced configuration capabilities.
Why this product is good
Parcel is a web application bundler that is appreciated for its simplicity and zero-config philosophy. It automatically detects the files needed for a project without requiring a complex configuration file. Its fast performance is attributed to parallelization and efficient caching. Additionally, Parcel offers out-of-the-box support for JavaScript, CSS, HTML, asset management, and various types of file transformations, making it a versatile tool for web developers.
Recommended for
Developers new to module bundlers or looking for an easy-to-setup tool.
Projects that value speed and simplicity in their build processes.
Developers who need a bundler capable of handling multiple asset types with minimal configuration.
Teams that prefer convention over configuration and want to get started quickly without diving deep into complex bundler settings.
Packer is notably light, high performing, and operates on every major operating system. It assembles and configures all the necessary components for a virtual machine then creates images that run on multiple...
Parcel's caching feature sees dramatically decreases in time consumption after the initial run. For frequent, small changes, in smaller projects **Parcel*8 is a great choice.
The big selling point of Parcel though is that it offers a zero configuration experience. This means all the features are available out of the box! It also boasts blazing fast bundle times 👟 You won’t be configuring...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.
Packer9 mentionsParcel115 mentions
Failed to connect to the host via SSH on Ubuntu 22.04
If you have just upgraded to Ubuntu 22.04, and you suddenly experience either errors when trying to ssh into hosts, or when running ansible or again when running the ansible provisioner building a packer image, this is probably going to...
- Source: dev.to
/
about 4 years ago
I am already using Hashicorp Packer at work and for personal projects and I wanted to test
This idea out by wrapping it a single Packer Template file. This reduces the level of maintaining
a lot of small scripts, Dockerfiles and...
- Source: dev.to
/
about 4 years ago
After self-hosting my email for twenty-three years I have thrown in the towel. The oligopoly has won.
And while it is a slight increase in complexity, it can be an overall net gain in functionality, configurability and reliability. Much like Packer is far more reliable and practical than manually making VM images sitting in front of a...
Source:
about 4 years ago
Parcel - Blazing fast, zero configuration web application bundler.
- Source: dev.to
/
9 months ago
Nix + pnpm + Parcel + lydell/elm-safe-virtual-dom
Pnpm and Parcel are used to build the application in nix/app.nix.
- Source: dev.to
/
9 months ago
Migrating a JavaScript Project from Prettier and ESLint to BiomeJS
Https://parceljs.org/ is another. It even supports languages like `` out of the box which is pretty cool. IIRC it downloads necessarily plugins on the fly.
- Source: Hacker News
/
over 1 year ago
Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.