
mabl
QA Wolf
QA Tech
Test automation platform for teams who can't afford execution risk.

SourceForge.net: ShellNewHandler details page

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, ShellNewHandler seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | owlity.ai | sourceforge.net |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | Startup from Cyprus · 20 - 49 employees · 2026 | — |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


Owlity is expert-augmented test automation — a platform that helps you record, run, and manage tests with confidence. No development environment needed to start. The platform: 🦉 Eye — A desktop app for recording tests. Click through your app, no code required. 🦉 Wing — Cloud execution. Run tests...
No description of ShellNewHandler yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


No features have been listed yet.
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Owlity.ai and ShellNewHandler.
Owlity.ai's answer
Owlity's uniqueness comes from combining two things that are usually sold separately: a no-code recorder and real QA expertise, in one platform. Most tools force a choice — either a DIY automation tool that leaves teams to figure out coverage on their own, or a fully managed service priced and scaled for enterprises. Owlity closes that gap. Teams record tests themselves in minutes with Owlity Eye, then let Owlity's experts expand that coverage further, up to 95%, without needing to hire or manage a QA team. It's also built by the founders of DeviQA, a QA services company with 16 years of hands-on testing experience — so the expert layer isn't an afterthought, it's the core of how the platform was designed.
Owlity.ai's answer
Owlity's primary audience is scaling startup CTOs and engineering leads — typically Series A–B B2B SaaS companies with 10–50 engineers, shipping weekly without a dedicated QA hire. They're the ones feeling the pressure of releasing fast while worrying a bug will reach a customer before the team catches it. Beyond that core group, Owlity also serves two adjacent audiences: digital agencies handling testing across multiple client projects, and individual QA engineers who want to expand their coverage without the backing of a full QA team.
Owlity.ai's answer
Owlity was born out of a problem its founders, Oleg Sadikov and Dmitry Reznik, kept seeing play out for 16 years. They also run DeviQA, a QA services company that's worked with product teams since 2010 — so they'd watched startups and scaling companies hit the same wall again and again: everyone knew solid test coverage mattered, but nobody could quite get there. Manual testing couldn't keep up with fast shipping. DIY automation tools took months to set up properly. And hiring an in-house QA team was a cost most companies couldn't justify. Owlity is their answer to that gap. It pairs a no-code recorder — simple enough for anyone on the team to use — with real QA expertise behind the scenes, so companies can get to 95% test coverage without the time sink of building automation themselves or the expense of hiring a QA department.
Owlity.ai's answer
Owlity sits in a gap most competitors don't cover. No-code recorders like Mabl or Testim are easy to start with, but teams are left on their own to expand and maintain coverage as the product grows. Fully managed services like QA Wolf solve that, but come with enterprise pricing and long contracts that don't make sense for a smaller team. Owlity gives teams both sides: a no-code recorder simple enough to start using in minutes, plus real QA expertise to expand that coverage to 95% — without the enterprise price tag or the commitment of a large managed contract. Pricing is credit-based and scales with actual usage, and teams can move between self-serve and managed support as their needs change, rather than being locked into one model.
Share your experience with using Owlity.ai and ShellNewHandler. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking Owlity.ai since Oct 2024.
Use Shell New Handler. Run the portable app and simply untick the items you don't want to appear in your new context menu. Source: about 4 years ago
I've always used ShellNewHandler for this. It's a really simple portable utility that allows you to remove most of the items from that menu. Tested it out on Windows 11 and it's still compatible. Source: over 5 years ago
When comparing Owlity.ai and ShellNewHandler, you can also consider the following products.


QA Wolf gets web apps to 80% automated end-to-end test coverage in weeks, not years. With unlimited, parallel runs and our Zero Flake Guarantee.
Compare QA Wolf to Owlity.ai or ShellNewHandler:

Improve your software quality with AI-driven QA testing. Find out how to ensure bug-free apps, with instant feedback and better productivity.
Compare QA Tech to Owlity.ai or ShellNewHandler: