
PrintNode
QZ Tray
PrintToPeer
Printout Designer
Bluetooth Print
Print Conductor
Printix
Print your online orders automatically to a thermal receipt printer, on any Android phone. Works with WooCommerce, Shopify and Wix (anything that sends an email). No computer, no cloud service. Free for 100 orders a month.

Bootstrap
Foundation
Semantic UI
UIKit
Tailwind CSS
Bulma
Material UI
A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Materialize CSS seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 28 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | orderprint.app | materializecss.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | 2026 | — |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


Online orders arrive as email. In a busy kitchen nobody is watching an inbox, so an order sits unnoticed until the customer phones to ask where it is. OrderPrint turns an ordinary Android phone into an automatic order printer. It sits by the till, watches the mailbox your order emails already...
No description of Materialize CSS yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of OrderPrint.app yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Materialize CSS is recommended for teams and developers who prefer Google's Material Design aesthetic, are building applications with a focus on rapid UI development, and value consistency and ease of use. It's also great for projects where a pre-existing UI library speeds up the development process, such as prototypes, admin dashboards, or smaller web applications. However, for highly customized UI components or non-Material Design projects, other frameworks might be more suitable.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Print WooCommerce Orders Automatically, No Computer, No Cloud Printer
More videos
Build A Travel Agency Theme With Materialize CSS 1.0.0
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing OrderPrint.app and Materialize CSS.
OrderPrint.app's answer
It started with a shop that kept missing online orders. They arrive as email, and during service nobody is watching an inbox — an order would sit there until the customer rang to ask where their food was.
The available answers all felt out of proportion. A cloud receipt printer cost more than the till it sat next to. A PC left running in the corner was one Windows update away from a silent morning. Both needed looking after.
The realisation was that the order was already arriving — as an email, on time, every time. Nothing needed integrating. Something just needed to read it and put it on paper. So that's what it does, using the old Android phone in a drawer.
OrderPrint.app's answer
Three reasons, and one reason not to.
Cost: the hardware is a cheap thermal printer and an Android phone you probably already own, rather than a cloud-connected printer that costs more than the till it sits beside.
Nothing to keep running: no computer switched on all day, and no plugin on your site to maintain or to break at the next update.
Any platform: because it reads the order email, adding a second sales channel doesn't mean finding another printing solution.
The reason not to: if you need one system managing printers across several sites centrally, a print service running on a computer will suit you better than we will. We bill per phone, and we're honest about that being the wrong shape for a chain.
OrderPrint.app's answer
Small independent food businesses, mainly — restaurants, takeaways, cafés, bakeries and dark kitchens taking online orders. Also small online shops that pack their own parcels and want a picking ticket.
Typically one to five people, one or two locations, selling through WooCommerce, Shopify or Wix, with no IT person and no appetite for a monthly bill that grows faster than the business does.
OrderPrint.app's answer
It works from the order email rather than an integration. Your shop already emails you every order, so OrderPrint just reads that mailbox — nothing is installed on your website, and it doesn't care whether you sell on WooCommerce, Shopify, Wix or something nobody has heard of.
There is also no OrderPrint server. The phone reads the mailbox itself, so your email password and your customers' orders never leave the device.
And it assumes printing will eventually fail. The status card is never green unless orders are actually printing, and a ticket that doesn't come out raises an alert naming the printer and the order. Most tools in this space treat printing as the problem. The real problem is not noticing when it stops.
OrderPrint.app's answer
Flutter and Dart, targeting Android.
Email is read over IMAP directly from the device. Receipts are composed as ESC/POS byte streams and sent either over Bluetooth Classic (RFCOMM) or to a network printer on TCP port 9100. Polling runs in an Android foreground service so it keeps working with the app in the background, and subscriptions go through Google Play Billing.
There is no backend at all — no server, no database, no API of ours in the middle. Everything happens on the phone.
Share your experience with using OrderPrint.app and Materialize CSS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of OrderPrint.app yet. Be the first one to post
Material Design is a design language that combines classic principles of successful design with innovation and technology. One of the downsides of Materialize is that it does not support older versions of web...
Materialize is a modern responsive front-end framework based on the Material Design principles of Google. Material design is a design language created by Google, which combines traditional design methods with...
Created by Google in 2014, Materialize is a responsive UI framework for websites and Android apps. It provides many ready-to-use components, classes, and starter templates. It is compatible with Sass and has a...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking OrderPrint.app since Sep 2026.
Materialize - Responsive front-end framework based on Material Design. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
Sure, why not use Blazor? It makes life easier for the developers who are primarily backend, to work on the frontend as well. Seems like the better choice. So what's next? The UI library. No shade to the long-time standing Bootstrap, but... - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
Materialize is a modern CSS framework based on Google’s Material Design. It was created and designed by Google to provide a unified and consistent user interface across all its products. Materialize is focused on user experience as it... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
When comparing OrderPrint.app and Materialize CSS, you can also consider the following products.

PrintNode offers cloud printing solutions for web applications.
Compare PrintNode to OrderPrint.app or Materialize CSS:

Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions
Compare Bootstrap to OrderPrint.app or Materialize CSS:

Print raw (ZPL, ESC/P, FGL), HTML, PDF as well as communicate with USB, HID, and serial devices...
Compare QZ Tray to OrderPrint.app or Materialize CSS:

The most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world
Compare Foundation to OrderPrint.app or Materialize CSS:

Cloud automation for 3D printer fleets
Compare PrintToPeer to OrderPrint.app or Materialize CSS:

A UI Component library implemented using a set of specifications designed around natural language
Compare Semantic UI to OrderPrint.app or Materialize CSS: