
Helicone AI
Langfuse
Intellize.ai
Overseer AI
Feature-level AI observability using real runtime data.

SourceForge.net: ShellNewHandler details page

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, ShellNewHandler seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | withorbit.io | sourceforge.net |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


Orbit is an observability platform for AI-powered applications. It helps developers and teams track LLM costs, latency, and errors - broken down by feature, task, and customer. Key Features: Cost tracking by feature, not just monthly totals Latency and error monitoring per API call Task and...
No description of ShellNewHandler yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
No features have been listed yet.
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing withOrbit.io and ShellNewHandler.
withOrbit.io's answer
Built by a Senior PM who kept seeing the same problem: AI features that looked fine but quietly burned margin. No tool answered "what part of my product is expensive?" So I built one.
withOrbit.io's answer
Next.js, TypeScript, Supabase, and Node.js/Python SDKs for client instrumentation.
withOrbit.io's answer
Currently in public beta with early adopters. Free tier available.
withOrbit.io's answer
Orbit focuses on feature-level cost attribution, not just API logs. While other tools show you traces and totals, Orbit answers "which feature is burning my budget?" with a one-line SDK integration.
withOrbit.io's answer
Simpler setup (one line of code), built-in cost tracking by feature/task/customer out of the box, and native support for agentic workflows where a single user action triggers multiple LLM calls.
withOrbit.io's answer
Developers, FinOps, Product managers, and engineering teams shipping AI-powered features in production. Especially those using OpenAI, Anthropic, or Gemini who need visibility into what's driving their LLM costs.
Share your experience with using withOrbit.io and ShellNewHandler. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking withOrbit.io since Jan 2026.
Use Shell New Handler. Run the portable app and simply untick the items you don't want to appear in your new context menu. Source: about 4 years ago
I've always used ShellNewHandler for this. It's a really simple portable utility that allows you to remove most of the items from that menu. Tested it out on Windows 11 and it's still compatible. Source: over 5 years ago
When comparing withOrbit.io and ShellNewHandler, you can also consider the following products.

Open-source LLM Observability for Developers
Compare Helicone AI to withOrbit.io or ShellNewHandler:

Langfuse is an open-source LLM engineering platform that helps teams collaboratively debug, analyze, and iterate on their LLM applications.
Compare Langfuse to withOrbit.io or ShellNewHandler:

AI-first observability platform
Compare Intellize.ai to withOrbit.io or ShellNewHandler:

Handle AI Governance with a Simple, Custom Policy-Driven API
Compare Overseer AI to withOrbit.io or ShellNewHandler: