Options-Trader.app VS Embeddable

Options-Trader.app's answer

Private traders who buy calls and puts on US stocks and ETFs, with holding periods from a few days to about three weeks. Typically they already know what IV rank and delta are, and they want a consistent daily check of their watchlist instead of clicking through dozens of charts. Many use Interactive Brokers, but it isn’t required.

Embeddable's answer:

Software companies who care about the UX and loading speed of their customer-facing analytics.

Options-Trader.app's answer

It shows the reasons behind every result. Each stock or ETF on your watchlist gets a score from 1 to 5 and LONG CALL, LONG PUT or WAIT, and the app lists why. The rules are fixed and explained on a public methodology page. Implied volatility comes from the option chain, and the app tells you when a name has no option IV instead of quietly using historical volatility. It only shows bought options, so the risk of every setup is limited to the premium. And it runs as a desktop app on your own computer, not as a web account.

Embeddable's answer:

Get the best of 'Build vs. Buy' in one stack-agnostic solution. Embeddable gives you full control over the frontend of your analytics experience, and handles the backend for you. No longer do you have to choose between a limited out-of-the-box solution, or building everything from scratch.

Options-Trader.app's answer

I’m an engineer from Germany and trade options privately. My account only allows bought options, and I wanted the same check of my watchlist every morning, by the same rules, instead of deciding by gut feeling. So I built a dashboard for my Interactive Brokers account. Over time it got good enough that I turned it into an app for Mac and Windows. I still log the signals of my own dashboard and fix what doesn’t hold up.

Embeddable's answer:

Embeddable is from the team behind Trevor.io -- a popular internal BI tool which also allows you to embed dashboards into your app. We realised embedding dashboards from a BI tool into your app wasn't the 'dream solution', and building analytics from scratch was super expensive... so we built Embeddable from the ground up to enable teams to deliver fully-bespoke, highly-performant analytics in their apps for their customers in 10% of the time.

Embeddable's answer:

• Scalapay
• Adthena
• Irwin
• EtonX
• Resident Advisor
• Facilities Solutions Group (FSG)
• Multibrain
• Raydiant
• ThinkCERCA
• Tixly
• Softools
• Faheem App
• Just Move In
• Any Creek

Options-Trader.app's answer

Most options tools are either flow and data platforms that leave the interpretation to you, or signal services that don’t explain where a signal comes from. Options Trader Pro sits in between. It runs the same checks on every name each day and shows a rule-based example setup with strike, expiry, target and stop, next to the reasons that led to it. You decide whether to trade. It costs €4.99 a month, works with free delayed data, and connects read only to Interactive Brokers if you want real-time quotes and Greeks. It does not suit traders who sell options or need a strategy builder for spreads.

Embeddable's answer:

If you want full control over the UX of your customer-facing analytics experience, but don't want to invest months of developer time on building and maintaining a fully-custom build -- OR -- if you're using an embedded analytics too already that loads slowly and doesn't look and feel like the rest of your platform.

Options-Trader.app's answer

Python with Flask for the local backend, pandas and NumPy for the indicators, and yfinance for the free market data. The optional real-time connection uses the Interactive Brokers TWS API. The interface is plain HTML and JavaScript with Chart.js. The app is packaged with PyInstaller for macOS and Windows, and the Windows build runs on GitHub Actions. Licences and payments go through Stripe.