Optery VS cppcryptfs

• Data Privacy Enhancement
  Optery helps individuals manage and remove their personal data from data brokers, enhancing their online privacy and reducing unwanted exposure.
• Ease of Use
  Optery provides a user-friendly interface to guide users through the process of data deletion, making it accessible even for those with limited technical knowledge.
• Comprehensive Coverage
  The service covers a wide range of data broker sites, increasing the chances of personal data removal across multiple platforms.
• Time-Saving
  Instead of individuals having to manually contact each data broker, Optery automates the process, saving users considerable time and effort.

Possible disadvantages

• Subscription Cost
  Optery typically operates on a subscription model, which may be a recurring cost that not all users are willing to incur.
• Variable Success Rates
  The effectiveness of data removal can vary, as success depends on the compliance of individual data brokers.
• Limited Control
  Users might feel they have less direct control over the data removal process compared to handling it manually.
• Residual Data
  Even after using Optery, there might still be residual data left online due to the constantly changing nature of data collection and sharing practices.

• Open Source
  cppcryptfs is open-source software, allowing users to review, modify, and contribute to its codebase, enhancing transparency and trust.
• Integration
  It integrates with Windows seamlessly as it is designed to provide a virtual file system layer, making it user-friendly for people familiar with Windows environments.
• Encryption
  Offers strong encryption using the underlying Cryptographic File System (CFS) technology, ensuring files are securely protected.
• Portability
  Encrypted files can be easily transported and accessed on other systems running cppcryptfs, providing flexibility in usage.
• Performance
  Efficient in terms of performance, as it encrypts files on-the-fly without substantial overhead, maintaining system responsiveness.

Possible disadvantages

• Platform Limitation
  Primarily designed for Windows, which may limit usage for those looking for multi-platform solutions.
• Complexity
  While aimed at being user-friendly, setting up and managing encrypted volumes may still require a learning curve for non-technical users.
• Dependency
  Depends on other systems like Dokan for mounting the encrypted file systems, which could complicate installation and compatibility.
• Support
  As with many open-source projects, support is mainly community-driven, which might not meet the needs of users requiring professional support services.
• Maintenance
  The reliance on open-source contributors for updates and maintenance may lead to slower response times for bug fixes and new features.

• YSK your personal information is publicly available and you should request them to be removed

  I opted to pay for optery.com to do all the legwork for me. It’s a yearly subscription but doesn’t seem too steep for what I get. They send you regular reports with before and after screenshots of said sites showing your information... Source: almost 4 years ago

• v1.7.4-x64 (Windows) Corrupts Word Documents - Use Caution - Data loss on editing / saving any document.

  Https://github.com/bailey27/cppcryptfs with dokan and I’ve not had a single issue for a year. I use it with Google drive and iCloud Drive it’s amazing. Source: over 3 years ago

• What do you guys use for all your personal info?

  There's cppcryptfs & securefs as Cryptomator alternatives too. SiriKali is an option for a GUI that works nicely with them. Source: over 3 years ago

• Dropbox deletes Rick and Morty creators account for secret TOS violation

  Hmmm... I largely use https://github.com/bailey27/cppcryptfs with dropbox? This would essentially eliminate any possibility of violating any terms of service as far as I can tell? I'm not too comfortable putting any files on dropbox... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

View more