Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

OpenCL VS CMake

Compare OpenCL VS CMake and see what are their differences

OCL
OpenCL

Application and Data, Languages & Frameworks, and Language Extensions

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
CMake

CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
LibHunt
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, CMake seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 55 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 55
Application And Data popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
10 vs 154

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

OCL
OpenCL
CMake
Website en.wikipedia.org cmake.org
Listed in
Data Science And Machine Learning Data Science Tools Application And Data Software Libraries +1
Front End Package Manager JavaScript Package Manager JS Build Tools Package Manager +1

About OpenCL and CMake

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

OCL
OpenCL
CMake

No description of OpenCL yet.

We recommend LibHunt CMake for discovery and comparisons of trending CMake projects.

Read more about CMake

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

OCL
OpenCL 0 features
CMake 5 features

No features have been listed yet.

  • Cross-platform support
    CMake is designed to support multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux. This allows developers to write platform-independent CMake scripts.
  • Build tool agnostic
    CMake can generate build files for a variety of build systems including Makefiles, Ninja, and Visual Studio solutions. This means developers are not tied to a specific build tool.
  • Large community and extensive documentation
    CMake has a large user base and an extensive amount of documentation and tutorials available which can be helpful for new and experienced users alike.
  • Integrated testing support
    CMake includes support for testing frameworks such as CTest, which allows for automated testing of code during the build process.
  • Modular and scalable
    CMake is highly modular, enabling users to create reusable and maintainable code by organizing CMake scripts into libraries and modules.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep learning curve
    CMake's complexity and its extensive range of features can be difficult for beginners to grasp, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Verbose syntax
    CMake scripts can often become verbose and difficult to read, especially for large projects. This can make maintenance and debugging challenging.
  • Inconsistent module quality
    The quality and support of different CMake modules can vary, sometimes leading to issues with compatibility or functionality.
  • Performance overhead
    CMake may introduce some performance overhead during the configuration process, especially for very large projects.
  • Complexity in advanced features
    Some of the more advanced features of CMake, such as custom commands and complex dependency management, can be quite difficult to implement correctly.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

OCL
OpenCL
CMake

No analysis of OpenCL yet.

Overall verdict

  • CMake is generally considered a good tool for managing the build process of software projects, especially those with a complex codebase that spans multiple platforms.

Why this product is good

  • Flexibility
    It offers great flexibility in terms of defining build processes, enabling advanced configuration and optimization techniques to be used.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with many popular IDEs and other tools, providing a smoother development experience.
  • Wide adoption
    CMake is widely used in the industry, which leads to robust community support and regular updates.
  • Cross platform support
    CMake is designed to support multiple platforms, which makes it highly valuable for projects that need to be compiled and run on different operating systems.

Recommended for

  • projects requiring cross-platform compatibility
  • developers looking for a powerful build configuration tool
  • complex software projects with numerous dependencies
  • teams that value strong community and industry support

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

OCL
OpenCL 3 videos + Add
CMake 3 videos + Add

Episode 1: What is OpenCL™?

More videos

  • - Harnessing the POWER of Your Graphics Card💪 | An Introduction to OpenCL
  • - Kindle Fire HD Running OpenCL: Engadget Eyes On Review!

CMake for Dummies

More videos

  • - CppCon 2017: Mathieu Ropert “Using Modern CMake Patterns to Enforce a Good Modular Design”
  • - Hunter, a CMake driven package manager for C/C++ projects - Daniel Friedrich - Lightning Talks

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
OCL
OpenCL
CMake
100% 100%
Application And Data
0% 0%
0% 0%
Front End Package Manager
100% 100%
100% 100%
Data Science Tools
0% 0%
0% 0%
JS Build Tools
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using OpenCL and CMake. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

OCL
OpenCL 0 mentions
CMake 55 mentions

Tracking OpenCL since Mar 2021.

  • How I deployed my first project for my devops portfolio: Project Architecture
    I used CMAKE as my compiling tool followed by make. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • DeadLock: Research Results & Tech Stack
    All this C++ project can't be ran as simple C++ code, so I will be building this whole package using CMake. It will streamline building this project onto other computers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Master This Feature of DevEco Studio to Efficiently Implement ArkTS and C++ Glue Code
    For knowledge in this aspect, you can refer to the relevant documents of the CMake build tool: https://cmake.org/. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

View more

Alternatives to OpenCL and CMake

When comparing OpenCL and CMake, you can also consider the following products.

  • Extism

    Extism is the open source, universal plug-in system. Extend all the software everywhere! Powered by WebAssembly.

    Compare Extism to OpenCL or CMake:

    Extism vs OpenCL Extism vs CMake
  • GNU Make

    GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

    Compare GNU Make to OpenCL or CMake:

    GNU Make vs OpenCL GNU Make vs CMake
  • OpenCV

    OpenCV is the world's biggest computer vision library

    Compare OpenCV to OpenCL or CMake:

    OpenCV vs OpenCL OpenCV vs CMake
  • SCons

    SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

    Compare SCons to OpenCL or CMake:

    SCons vs OpenCL SCons vs CMake
  • TensorFlow

    TensorFlow is an open-source machine learning framework designed and published by Google. It tracks data flow graphs over time. Nodes in the data flow graphs represent machine learning algorithms. Read more about TensorFlow.

    Compare TensorFlow to OpenCL or CMake:

    TensorFlow vs OpenCL TensorFlow vs CMake
  • SBT

    SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.

    Compare SBT to OpenCL or CMake:

    SBT vs OpenCL SBT vs CMake
Loading...