OpenAI
ChatGPT
Gemini
Claude AI
Claude by Anthropic
Hugging Face
GitHub Copilot
Writesonic
ForthWrite
Superhuman
Gemini
Lavender
Mailmeteor
Spark Mail
ForthWrite is an AI email writing assistant for Gmail and Outlook that learns your writing style from your real sent mail. The more you use it, the more it sounds like you. Get smart drafts in seconds, auto-draft replies before you open your inbox, and maintain your personal voice at scale. Free to start, no credit card required. Works inside Gmail and Outlook on the web.
How it works
ForthWrite captures your tone, sentence rhythm, and sign-offs from your actual sent emails, then uses that profile to generate drafts that match how you write, not a generic AI voice. Every draft you edit or send improves the model over time.
Key features
Who uses it
Professionals who send high volumes of relationship-critical email: lawyers, financial advisors, recruiters, account executives, founders, and anyone who wants their inbox handled without sounding like a chatbot wrote it.
Pricing
Free tier includes 10 drafts per week with no credit card required. Paid plans start at $12/month and include unlimited drafts, custom persona prompts, and auto-draft.
OpenAI ForthWriteNo ForthWrite videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
ForthWrite's answer:
Next.js, React, Supabase, Anthropic Claude, OpenAI, Stripe, Vercel, Chrome Extensions API
ForthWrite's answer:
ForthWrite learns your writing style from your actual sent mail, not a generic prompt. Every draft sounds like you wrote it because it was trained on how you actually write. It also auto-drafts replies before you open your inbox, so your email is partially handled before your day starts.
ForthWrite's answer:
Most AI email tools give you a blank box and a "write for me" button. ForthWrite builds a voice profile from your sent history and gets more accurate with every draft you edit or send. Unlike ChatGPT or Gemini, it works natively inside Gmail and Outlook with no copy-paste. Unlike Lavender, it writes the draft, not just scores it.
ForthWrite's answer:
Professionals who send high volumes of relationship-critical email and cannot afford to sound generic: lawyers, financial advisors, recruiters, account executives, consultants, and founders managing their own inbox.
ForthWrite's answer:
Built out of frustration with AI writing tools that produce text that sounds nothing like the person sending it, and as a way to handle large amounts of daily email. The core insight was that your sent mail is the best training data you already have, and no tool was using it.
I built ForthWrite because I kept sending emails that sounded like they came from the same generic AI as everyone else. After launching it, I still use it for my own inbox every day, which is about the most honest endorsement I can give.
The Chrome extension lives inside Gmail and Outlook on the web. Open a thread, hit Alt+Shift+D, and a draft comes back in your voice, not a template. The free tier is real: 10 drafts per week, no API key, no credit card. Voice matching is included on free, because that is the point.
What keeps it useful compared to Gemini or a chat tab: it learns from what you actually send. Every edit you make before hitting send becomes a signal. Over time the drafts drift closer to how you really write, and the dashboard shows the improvement curve so you can see it happening.
The web compose surface lets you draft from forthwrite.ai without installing anything, useful for people who want to try before committing to the extension.
Standard adds recipient-aware and intent-aware drafting plus AI coaching. Pro adds auto-draft (replies waiting when you open Gmail), batch replies, and Prompt Lab for version-controlling your prompts. Teams adds a shared persona and seat-level analytics.
ForthWrite is not for everyone. If you just need quick replies and tone does not matter, Gemini is free and already in your inbox. ForthWrite is for people where tone does matter: client communication, relationship-driven threads, external correspondence where sounding off costs something real.
Disclosure: I am the founder and use it daily. Happy to answer questions in the comments.
Based on our record, OpenAI seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 398 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Provider-side metadata. Both major providers expose per-user tagging. OpenAI accepts a user parameter on the Chat Completions and Responses APIs, and the OpenAI Usage API (launched December 2024) supports group_by=user_id for programmatic per-user cost breakdown. The Costs endpoint requires an admin key. Anthropic accepts metadata.user_id on every API request, capped at 256 characters and explicitly not for PII.... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
For solo founders who don't run their own gateway: use Claude direct for highest quality, OpenAI for proven reliability, or wire up multi-provider routing via something like Prism (or build your own โ see Prism's architecture once it's published). - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Composer 2 originally gained attention because Cursor delivered strong coding performance at dramatically lower token costs than frontier proprietary models. Cursor positioned it as a cheaper alternative to systems from Anthropic and OpenAI. (Cursor). - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
The most extreme case arrived in April 2026. In 2024, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman predicted that a one-person billion-dollar company "would have been unimaginable without A.I., and now it will happen." He maintained a betting pool with fellow tech CEOs over when it would arrive. In April 2026, he emailed the New York Times claiming he won the bet and that he "would like to meet the guy.". - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Everyone sees what they want in their benchmarks. OpenAI sees reasoning capability. Anthropic sees safety and helpfulness. Google sees multimodal understanding. The academic community sees generalization. Same numbers, completely different conclusions. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
ChatGPT - ChatGPT is a powerful, open-source language model.
Superhuman - Superhuman is an email management tool.
Gemini - Gemini, formerly known as Bard, is a generative artificial intelligence chatbot developed by Google. Based on the large language model (LLM) of the same name, it was launched in 2023 in response to the rise of OpenAI's ChatGPT.
Claude AI - Claude is a next generation AI assistant built for work and trained to be safe, accurate, and secure. An AI assistant from Anthropic.
Lavender - Realtime coaching for sales emails.
Claude by Anthropic - A family of foundational AI models
