OpenAI o1 VS https://open-gpt.app/

• Advanced Reasoning Capabilities
  OpenAI o1 is specifically designed to reason through complex problems before responding. It uses a chain-of-thought process that allows it to tackle difficult tasks in science, mathematics, and coding with significantly improved accuracy compared to previous models.
• Strong Performance on Benchmarks
  The model achieves impressive results on challenging benchmarks, including scoring at the level of PhD students on physics, biology, and chemistry problems (GPQA), and ranking in the 89th percentile on Codeforces competitive programming. It also excels on math olympiad-level problems (AIME).
• Improved Safety Through Reasoning
  The chain-of-thought reasoning capability allows o1 to better understand and apply safety rules, making it more robust against adversarial attempts to bypass safety guidelines (jailbreaks). It scored significantly higher on safety evaluations compared to GPT-4o.
• Iterative Problem Solving
  Unlike previous models that generate immediate responses, o1 can spend more time thinking through problems, recognizing mistakes, and trying different approaches before arriving at an answer. This deliberative process leads to more accurate and well-considered outputs.
• Scalable Performance with Compute
  The model's performance consistently improves with both increased training-time compute and additional test-time compute (more thinking time). This scaling behavior suggests that the reasoning capabilities will continue to improve with future iterations.

Possible disadvantages

• Slower Response Times
  Because o1 engages in extensive internal reasoning before producing a response, it takes significantly longer to generate answers compared to models like GPT-4o. This makes it less suitable for applications requiring low latency or quick interactions.
• Higher Cost
  OpenAI o1 is more expensive to use than GPT-4o, with o1-preview priced at $15 per million input tokens and $60 per million output tokens, making it considerably costlier for developers and businesses to deploy at scale.
• Limited Feature Set at Launch
  The initial release of o1-preview lacks several features available in GPT-4o, including browsing, file and image uploads, and tool/function calling capabilities. This limits its utility for many practical applications that require multimodal or integrated functionality.
• Hidden Chain of Thought
  OpenAI does not expose the raw chain-of-thought reasoning to users, only providing a summary. This limits transparency and makes it harder for developers and researchers to fully understand, debug, or verify the model's reasoning process.
• Not Always the Best Choice
  For many tasks that don't require deep reasoning, such as general text generation, summarization, or simple Q&A, o1 is overkill and GPT-4o may actually perform equally well or better while being faster and cheaper. The model's strengths are narrowly focused on complex reasoning tasks.

• Accessible AI Chat Interface
  Provides a user-friendly web-based interface for interacting with GPT-based AI models without needing to set up API access or coding knowledge.
• No Installation Required
  Being a web application, it can be used directly from a browser without downloading or installing any software.
• Potentially Free or Low-Cost Access
  Many GPT wrapper sites like this offer free tiers or lower-cost access compared to official API pricing, making AI chat more accessible to casual users.
• Quick Setup
  Users can typically start chatting almost immediately after visiting the site, with minimal account creation or configuration steps.
• Cross-Platform Compatibility
  Since it runs in a browser, it can be accessed from various devices including desktops, tablets, and smartphones without platform-specific versions.

Possible disadvantages

• Uncertain Reliability
  Third-party GPT wrapper websites often depend on underlying API access that can be unstable, rate-limited, or discontinued without notice, affecting consistent availability.
• Data Privacy Concerns
  Using an unofficial third-party service to process conversations raises questions about how user data and conversation history are stored, used, or shared.
• Limited Transparency
  It may be unclear which underlying AI model version is being used, how up-to-date it is, or what modifications have been made to the base model's behavior.
• Potential Hidden Costs or Ads
  Free-to-use AI wrapper sites often monetize through ads, premium upsells, or data collection, which may not be clearly disclosed to users upfront.
• Lack of Official Support
  Unlike official AI platforms, unofficial wrapper sites may lack dedicated customer support, regular updates, or accountability if issues arise.

• Beyond Size: The Three Pillars of Test-Time Scaling in Large Language Models

  This shift toward "test-time scaling" marks a transition from static intelligence to dynamic reasoning. Instead of relying solely on the patterns learned during training, models are now being equipped with the computational budget to... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

Tracking https://open-gpt.app/ since Jul 2023.