Open Source @ Microsoft VS Nike OSS

Microsoft's Open Source projects on Github

Nike's Open Source software projects

No features have been listed yet.

Innovation
Nike's open-source software allows for innovative solutions and contributes to the evolution of technology by making code available to the public.
Community Collaboration
By open-sourcing their software, Nike fosters a community of collaboration, allowing developers to contribute to and improve the software over time.
Cost Efficiency
Open-source software can reduce costs for Nike by leveraging community contributions and reducing the need for in-house development for certain projects.
Transparency
Open source promotes transparency in code, which can lead to improved trust from users and stakeholders who can review the code for security and quality.

Loss of Competitive Advantage
By open-sourcing software, Nike might lose some competitive edge as their proprietary solutions become available to competitors.
Quality Control Challenges
Managing the quality of contributions can be challenging, as open-source projects often involve diverse contributors with varying levels of expertise.
Security Vulnerabilities
Open source software can be an attractive target for malicious actors who can identify vulnerabilities within the publicly available code.
Dependency Management
Relying on open-source components can pose risks due to dependency management issues, where updates or changes in third-party libraries may affect functionality.