Open Shell VS PostSharp

• Customization
  Open Shell provides extensive customization options, allowing users to modify the Start menu to fit their preferences, from design to functionality.
• Familiar Interface
  It offers a classic start menu which is familiar to users of older Windows versions, making it easier for them to navigate.
• Open Source
  Being an open-source project, it allows for community contributions, making it more transparent and potentially more secure.
• No Cost
  Open Shell is free to use, providing a cost-effective solution for users who want a different Start menu experience without paying for software.
• Regular Updates
  The project is fairly well-maintained, receiving updates that add new features and fix potential issues, improving user experience over time.

Possible disadvantages

• Compatibility Issues
  There could be compatibility problems with certain Windows updates or third-party applications, requiring troubleshooting and fixes.
• Learning Curve
  While it offers many customization options, new users might find the settings and customization process overwhelming and confusing initially.
• Community Support
  As an open-source project, it relies heavily on community support rather than professional customer service, which can be a drawback for users needing prompt assistance.
• Resource Usage
  Though generally lightweight, Open Shell can consume additional system resources, which might be impactful on less powerful machines.

• Aspect-Oriented Programming (AOP)
  PostSharp allows developers to implement AOP in .NET projects, which helps in separating cross-cutting concerns like logging, error handling, or validation, making the code cleaner and easier to maintain.
• Code Reusability
  By using aspects, developers can write code that can be easily reused across different parts of an application, reducing redundancy and improving efficiency.
• Maintainability
  PostSharp helps to create a more modular codebase. With cross-cutting concerns handled separately, it becomes easier to manage and modify without affecting the core business logic.
• Performance
  PostSharp weaves aspects into compiled code at build time, which generally leads to better runtime performance compared to other AOP approaches that might involve reflection or dynamic proxies.
• Rich Library of Aspects
  It provides a comprehensive library of pre-built aspects like caching, threading, and security, which can accelerate development by reducing the need to implement common functionalities from scratch.

Possible disadvantages

• Learning Curve
  For developers unfamiliar with AOP, there might be a steep learning curve to understand and effectively leverage PostSharp's capabilities.
• Debugging Complexity
  The abstraction layer introduced by aspects can make debugging more challenging as it might not be immediately clear where certain behaviors or errors originate from.
• Cost
  PostSharp is a commercial product with licensing fees, which might be a concern for small projects or organizations with limited budgets.
• Build Time Overhead
  The process of weaving aspects into the code can increase the time taken for builds, which might be noticeable and frustrating for very large projects.
• Vendor Lock-in
  Relying heavily on PostSharp-specific features might lead to challenges if there's a need to switch to a different AOP framework or if PostSharp's development ceases.

Classic Menu for Windows 10 with Open Shell

Aspect Oriented Programming with PostSharp | Pluralsight

More videos