Open NASA VS GitHub Contributions

• Empowerment
  Open NASA encourages and empowers women to pursue careers in STEM fields by providing role models and success stories.
• Visibility
  The platform increases visibility of women in NASA, showcasing their contributions and achievements in space exploration.
• Inspiration
  By highlighting the journeys of women at NASA, the site serves as a source of inspiration for young girls and women considering STEM careers.
• Educational Resource
  Offers educational content that can be used by teachers and students to learn more about the role of women in science and technology.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Audience
  The content might not reach a wide audience beyond those already interested in NASA or gender diversity in STEM.
• Impact Measurement
  The direct impact of the site on increasing women participation in STEM fields can be difficult to measure objectively.
• Content Depth
  Depending on user expectations, some may find the content not deep enough in terms of technical detail or personal stories.
• Resource Intensive
  Maintenance and updating of the platform require continuous resources, which might be challenging for ensuring updated information.

• Engagement Visualization
  GitHub Contributions offers a visual representation of a user's activity, making it easier to understand coding engagement over time.
• Motivation Boost
  Seeing contributions grow can motivate users to stay active and engaged in their projects, fostering a consistent coding habit.
• Personal Progress Tracking
  It allows users to track their personal development and see how their contributions evolve, which can be helpful for setting and achieving coding goals.
• Public Portfolio
  Serves as a public portfolio that showcases a developer's skills and contributions to recruiters or collaborators who might view their profile.

Possible disadvantages

• Pressure and Stress
  The focus on daily contributions might cause unnecessary stress and pressure to maintain streaks, potentially prioritizing quantity over quality.
• Misleading Activity Representation
  The contribution graph may not accurately represent meaningful work, as it doesn't necessarily distinguish between minor and major contributions.
• Privacy Concerns
  Users looking for more privacy might find the public display of contributions uncomfortable, as it can reveal work habits and patterns.
• Focus Shift
  Developers might focus too much on maintaining green squares rather than prioritizing learning, meaningful contributions, or quality work.

• How can I stay motivated in school if I'm not 100% sure what path I want to take?

  I do think women have a harder row to hoe at NASA. But more women are working there than ever before and some in high-level positions. Here are a few women at NASA: https://women.nasa.gov/. Source: over 4 years ago

• The hidden story behind your GitHub contribution chart

  Funnily enough, this tool isn't new but it's been there since 2018 and you can find it at https://github-contributions.vercel.app/. Source: over 3 years ago