Open Collective VS Thanks (for Python)

Thanks (for Python)

A Python tool for giving back to the packages we use.

Landing page //
2023-04-25

Landing page //
2023-09-16

Open Collective

Website: opencollective.com
Pricing URL: Official Open Collective Pricing
$ Details

Edit details

Thanks (for Python)

Website: github.com
Pricing URL: -
$ Details: -

Edit details

Open Collective features and specs

Transparency
Open Collective offers transparent accounting and financial reporting, allowing everyone to see how funds are being used.
Community Engagement
It allows communities to come together and support projects they care about with funding, facilitating strong community involvement.
Easy Fundraising
The platform simplifies the process of raising funds for open source projects, non-profits, and other community-driven initiatives.
Global Reach
Open Collective supports contributions from around the world, which can significantly expand the pool of potential donors and supporters.
Managed Fiscal Hosting
It provides fiscal hosting services that handle various financial and administrative tasks, reducing the workload for project maintainers.

Possible disadvantages of Open Collective

Fees
Open Collective charges fees for its services, which can be a downside for projects with limited budgets.
Complexity for Small Projects
For very small projects or initiatives, the platform might be overly complex and offer more features than needed.
Dependence on Platform
Relying solely on Open Collective for funding and financial management might create dependency, limiting flexibility to switch strategies.
Geographical Limitations
While it has global reach, there may be certain countries where donors or users face restrictions or limitations in using the platform.
Learning Curve
New users might find the platform's features and options overwhelming at the start, requiring time to learn and navigate effectively.

Thanks (for Python) features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis of Thanks (for Python)

Overall verdict

Thanks is a lightweight, useful utility for Python developers who want to automatically credit open-source dependencies, making it a good niche tool though not a mainstream necessity.

Why this product is good

Automatically generates attribution and license acknowledgments for dependencies used in a project
Simple and easy to integrate into existing Python workflows
Encourages good open-source citizenship by crediting maintainers and libraries
Lightweight tool with minimal setup and configuration required
Open-source itself, allowing community contributions and transparency

Recommended for

Python developers who want to give proper credit to open-source library maintainers
Teams maintaining compliance or attribution requirements for open-source usage
Open-source project maintainers looking to foster a culture of appreciation
Developers building README or documentation sections crediting dependencies

Open Collective videos

+ Add

What is Open Collective?

Thanks (for Python) videos

No Thanks (for Python) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Open Collective and Thanks (for Python))

Thanks (for Python)

Crowdfunding

99 99%

Crowdfunding

1% 1

Fundraising And Donation Management

100 100%

Fundraising And Donation Management

0% 0

Developer Tools

95 95%

Developer Tools

5% 5

Content Monetization

100 100%

Content Monetization

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Open Collective and Thanks (for Python). For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Open Collective seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 162 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Open Collective mentions (162)

Meta deletes popular 1M follower account after Kuwaiti request
This bears repeating: It has been clear for a while that certain providers and services need to be regulated as utilities - Microsoft, Google, Apple, Visa, Mastercard, and soon Openai and Anthropic. Social media companies, as de-facto public squares, should be clubbed into that category once they gain a certain reach. It should be illegal for these companies, just like utilities, to deny service to anyone or any... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Open Source Endowment – new funding source for open source maintainers
How is this different than something like https://opencollective.com (which, for example, Actual Budget uses: https://opencollective.com/actual ). - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
The Peaceful Transfer of Power in Open Source Projects
* Finances are handled by https://opencollective.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
Funding in Open Source: A Conversation with Chad Whitacre
Chad has been leading the Open Source Pledge, a simple framework to get companies to fund the projects they rely on. The idea is straightforward: for every developer your company employs, allocate $2,000 per year to open source. Distribute those funds however you want—GitHub Sponsors, Open Collective, Thanks.dev, direct payments, etc. The only other ask is to publish a blog post showing what you did. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
None of the top 10 projects in GitHub is actually a software project 🤯
We see some projects that can financially survive (via sponsor or external infrastructure such as open collective or patreon), favoring the long-term sustainability. Thus, we keep our stand on promoting a transparent governance model to state where the investment will be managed and who can benefit from it, especially when knowing that non-technical users have an increasing key role in these communities. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago