Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Open Collective VS Open Source @IFTTT

Compare Open Collective VS Open Source @IFTTT and see what are their differences

ScreenshotMAX
The all-in-one Screenshot API for developers: capture websites, generate PDFs, record videos, and automate it all with powerful, scalable infrastructure. No browser setup, no hassle. Just clean results, fast. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Open Collective logo Open Collective

Recurring funding for groups.

Open Source @IFTTT logo Open Source @IFTTT

A collection of IFTTT OSS projects.
  • Open Collective Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-25
  • Open Source @IFTTT Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-01-31

Open Collective features and specs

  • Transparency
    Open Collective offers transparent accounting and financial reporting, allowing everyone to see how funds are being used.
  • Community Engagement
    It allows communities to come together and support projects they care about with funding, facilitating strong community involvement.
  • Easy Fundraising
    The platform simplifies the process of raising funds for open source projects, non-profits, and other community-driven initiatives.
  • Global Reach
    Open Collective supports contributions from around the world, which can significantly expand the pool of potential donors and supporters.
  • Managed Fiscal Hosting
    It provides fiscal hosting services that handle various financial and administrative tasks, reducing the workload for project maintainers.

Possible disadvantages of Open Collective

  • Fees
    Open Collective charges fees for its services, which can be a downside for projects with limited budgets.
  • Complexity for Small Projects
    For very small projects or initiatives, the platform might be overly complex and offer more features than needed.
  • Dependence on Platform
    Relying solely on Open Collective for funding and financial management might create dependency, limiting flexibility to switch strategies.
  • Geographical Limitations
    While it has global reach, there may be certain countries where donors or users face restrictions or limitations in using the platform.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might find the platform's features and options overwhelming at the start, requiring time to learn and navigate effectively.

Open Source @IFTTT features and specs

  • Cost-effective
    Open source software is generally free to use, reducing the cost associated with purchasing licenses for proprietary software.
  • Community Support
    Open source projects often have a strong, active community that contributes to development, bug fixes, and support.
  • Flexibility and Customization
    Users have the ability to modify and customize open source software to fit their specific needs.
  • Transparency
    With open source, the code is available for review, providing transparency into its functionality, security, and potential vulnerabilities.
  • Rapid Innovation
    A broad base of contributors enables faster evolution and innovation through collective problem-solving and idea-sharing.

Possible disadvantages of Open Source @IFTTT

  • Lack of Official Support
    Open source software might lack dedicated professional support services, making it challenging for users who need immediate assistance.
  • Varying Quality
    The quality of open source software can vary significantly, sometimes leading to stability or security issues if not properly vetted or maintained.
  • Complexity
    Customization and configuration of open source software can be complex and require specialized technical knowledge.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Open source projects may not always be compatible with existing proprietary systems or require additional configuration.
  • Limited Documentation
    Comprehensive documentation may be lacking or inconsistent, making it harder to understand and use the software effectively.

Open Collective videos

+ Add

What is Open Collective?

Open Source @IFTTT videos

No Open Source @IFTTT videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Open Collective and Open Source @IFTTT)

Open Collective

Open Source @IFTTT

Crowdfunding
100 100%
Crowdfunding
0% 0
Open Source
0 0%
Open Source
100% 100
Fundraising And Donation Management
100 100%
Fundraising And Donation Management
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
Productivity
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Open Collective and Open Source @IFTTT. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Open Collective seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 159 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Open Collective mentions (159)

  • Funding in Open Source: A Conversation with Chad Whitacre
    Chad has been leading the Open Source Pledge, a simple framework to get companies to fund the projects they rely on. The idea is straightforward: for every developer your company employs, allocate $2,000 per year to open source. Distribute those funds however you want—GitHub Sponsors, Open Collective, Thanks.dev, direct payments, etc. The only other ask is to publish a blog post showing what you did. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • None of the top 10 projects in GitHub is actually a software project 🤯
    We see some projects that can financially survive (via sponsor or external infrastructure such as open collective or patreon), favoring the long-term sustainability. Thus, we keep our stand on promoting a transparent governance model to state where the investment will be managed and who can benefit from it, especially when knowing that non-technical users have an increasing key role in these communities. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Sustainable Funding for Open Source: Navigating Challenges and Emerging Innovations
    Leverage multiple platforms: Utilize GitHub Sponsors along with OpenCollective to broaden funding sources. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Exploring Open Source Project Sponsorship Opportunities: Enhancing Innovation with Blockchain and NFTs
    Traditionally, open source projects were sustained by volunteer contributions and modest donations. However, as digital infrastructure came to rely on open source software, the need for reliable, scalable funding became evident. Enter corporate sponsorship—a model where companies invest in open source initiatives to secure their technology stacks, attract top talent, and foster innovation. This has spurred the... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Innovative Strategies for Open Source Project Funding: A Comprehensive Guide
    Abstract: This post explores various open source project funding strategies and examines their evolution, core concepts, applications, challenges, and future trends. We discuss methods such as sponsorship and donations, crowdfunding, dual licensing, paid services, foundations and grants, and the freemium model. Through real-world examples and a technical yet accessible approach, this guide offers insight into... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
View more

Open Source @IFTTT mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Open Source @IFTTT yet. Tracking of Open Source @IFTTT recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Open Collective and Open Source @IFTTT, you can also consider the following products

GitHub Sponsors - Get paid to build what you love on GitHub

Google Open Source - All of Googles open source projects under a single umbrella

Patreon - Patreon enables fans to give ongoing support to their favorite creators.

Open Source Alternatives - 200+ open source alternatives to popular B2B tools

Liberapay - Liberapay is a recurrent donations platform.

Code NASA - 253 NASA open source software projects

Loading...