Open Benchmarks VS Apple Subscriptions

• Transparency
  Open Benchmarks provide complete visibility into business metrics, fostering trust with customers and stakeholders by showcasing honest performance data.
• Competitive Analysis
  Users can compare their company’s performance against industry standards, gaining insights into areas of strength and opportunities for improvement.
• Community Engagement
  By participating in Open Benchmarks, businesses can engage with a community of like-minded companies to share best practices and insights.
• Decision Making
  Access to a wide range of benchmarking data helps companies make informed strategic decisions by understanding market trends and performance benchmarks.

Possible disadvantages

• Data Privacy
  Publicly sharing detailed business metrics can lead to privacy concerns or expose sensitive information to competitors.
• Misinterpretation
  Without proper context, open data might be misunderstood by external parties, leading to incorrect conclusions about business performance.
• Resource Intensity
  Maintaining and updating metric data for Open Benchmarks requires significant time and resources which might be a burden for smaller companies.
• Competitive Disadvantage
  Providing open access to key performance indicators could potentially give competitors an advantage by revealing business strategies and operational efficiencies.

• Recurring Revenue
  Apple Subscriptions provide developers with a steady stream of revenue through recurring payments, aiding in financial predictability.
• Access to a Wide Audience
  By utilizing Apple's ecosystem, developers can reach millions of potential subscribers who are already integrated into the iOS platform.
• Flexible Subscription Models
  Developers can offer various subscription tiers, including free trials and introductory pricing, to attract and retain users.
• Convenient Billing System
  Apple manages the entire billing process, reducing the burden on developers to handle payment processing and user queries regarding payments.
• Seamless Integration
  Subscriptions are integrated directly into the App Store, providing users with a straightforward subscription management experience.

Possible disadvantages

• Revenue Share
  Apple takes a percentage of the subscription revenue, generally 30% for the first year and 15% for subsequent years, which can impact overall profitability for developers.
• Policy Restrictions
  Developers must adhere to Apple's strict App Store guidelines and policies, which can limit flexibility in how subscriptions are operated and offered.
• Competition
  The App Store is a highly competitive space, making it challenging for new apps to gain visibility among established subscription services.
• Dependence on Apple's Ecosystem
  Relying on Apple's systems and policies can be risky as any changes to the ecosystem might directly affect the subscription service.

Tracking Open Benchmarks since Mar 2021.

• iOS pricing

  See "Managing prices" under https://developer.apple.com/app-store/subscriptions. Source: over 3 years ago

• Elon Musk: Apple has mostly stopped advertising on Twitter. Do they hate free speech in America?

  From the 2nd year onwards Apple charges 15% for subscriptions, not 30%. Source: almost 4 years ago

• Implementing In-App Subscriptions in iOS & Android with no backend servers

  Apple and Google have great documentation if you need more information. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

View more