
Managed Hosting for developers, entrepreneurs, and businesses like yours

iLovePDF
Smallpdf
PDF24
MConverter
ONEPDF.online
PDF24 PDF Creator
PDF2Tool
Free, self-hosted PDF toolkit — merge, split, compress, and convert PDFs on your own server

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | opalstack.com | pdfchroma.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | — | Startup from Cyprus · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Opalstack yet.
PDF Chroma is a free, open-source, self-hosted PDF toolkit. Merge, split, rotate, add page numbers, compress, and convert PDFs to and from Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and JPG — all processed on your own server, with no file upload limits, no watermarks, and no sign-up required. Built with Node.js...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
No features have been listed yet.
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Opalstack and PDF Chroma.
PDF Chroma's answer:
Most free PDF tools ask you to upload your files to their servers, and you just have to trust that's handled responsibly. PDF Chroma flips that — it's self-hosted, meaning you run it on your own server, and your files never leave infrastructure you control. It's also fully open source, so nothing about how it works is hidden.
PDF Chroma's answer:
If privacy matters to you, or you just don't like the idea of your documents passing through a stranger's server, PDF Chroma is built exactly for that. No sign-up, no watermarks, no arbitrary upload limits — and since it's open source, you (or a developer you trust) can see exactly what it's doing with your files.
PDF Chroma's answer:
Anyone who's privacy-conscious about their documents — freelancers handling client contracts, small teams who don't want files touching third-party servers, and developers who'd rather self-host a tool than depend on someone else's free plan disappearing or adding limits later.
PDF Chroma's answer:
It started from a small, nagging feeling — using a free online PDF tool and halfway through uploading, wondering wait, where is this file actually going right now?" That question stuck around long enough that I decided to just build my own version, one where the answer to that question is always "nowhere but my own server.
PDF Chroma's answer:
Node.js and Express for the backend, with pdf-lib handling most PDF operations natively. LibreOffice and poppler-utils power the Office and image conversions. The frontend is plain HTML, CSS, and JavaScript — no framework. Nginx serves everything in production, with Let's Encrypt for HTTPS.
PDF Chroma's answer:
Just launched — no customer list to share yet, but the tool itself is fully live and usable today.
Share your experience with using Opalstack and PDF Chroma. For example, how are they different and which one is better?