
Wiz
Orca
Orca Scan
Palo Alto Prisma Cloud
Microsoft Defender
Lacework
Sysdig
Unified CNAPP platform: CSPM, CIEM, DSPM, CWPP, SSPM, agentless workload scanning, attack paths, threat detection & compliance across AWS, Azure, GCP, OCI, Alibaba, IBM, Kubernetes and SaaS. 100% agentless.

Cursor
Claude Code
Windsurf Editor
replit
Codeium
Tabnine
Codex by OpenAI
Your AI pair programmer. With GitHub Copilot, get suggestions for whole lines or entire functions right inside your editor.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, GitHub Copilot seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 389 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | onamsecurity.com | github.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | Startup from India · 1 - 9 employees · 2022 | Startup from the United States |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


Onam Security is a unified cloud security platform — CSPM, CNAPP and SSPM on a single security graph instead of six stitched-together products. One deployment covers posture management, attack-path analysis, identity and entitlements (CIEM), data security posture, container and Kubernetes...
Trained on billions of lines of public code, GitHub Copilot puts the knowledge you need at your fingertips, saving you time and helping you stay focused.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Onam Security yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
SaaS Security Posture Management: Why Your CSPM Stops at the Cloud Account
More videos
Game over… GitHub Copilot X announced
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Onam Security and GitHub Copilot.
Onam Security's answer
One security graph, not a suite. Most "unified" platforms are acquisitions stitched behind a single login — separate data models, separate consoles, findings that never meet. Onam was built from one inventory and one rule model, so connecting a single cloud account activates every capability at once: posture, attack paths, identity, data, containers, SaaS and detection. That design produces things a stitched suite structurally cannot. SaaS posture sits on the same graph as cloud posture, so a Google Workspace admin without MFA and an over-permissive IAM role can be scored as hops on one attack path. And coverage goes deep where others go wide — 11,346 posture rules across 549 services on seven clouds, including OCI, Alibaba Cloud and IBM Cloud, which most competitors treat as a checkbox.
Onam Security's answer
Three reasons. First, consolidation that is real: one agentless connection replaces six tools and five dashboards, and there is nothing to install — read-only credentials, no sidecars, no daemons on your nodes. Second, prioritisation you can act on. Attack-path analysis cuts thousands of findings to the handful an attacker could actually chain, each mapped to MITRE ATT&CK with hops-to-breach and blast radius, and risk is expressed in dollars via the FAIR model rather than another severity label. Third, breadth without shallowness: 78 compliance frameworks from a single control set, 7 clouds and 8 SaaS platforms on one graph, and rules defined in versioned YAML rather than hardcoded — so coverage is auditable and extensible instead of a marketing number.
Onam Security's answer
Small and mid-sized security teams carrying enterprise-sized cloud estates. The typical user is a cloud security engineer, security architect or head of security at an organisation running two or more clouds plus a heavy SaaS footprint, responsible for thousands of assets with a team of two to twenty people. They are the teams for whom the six-product approach never worked — not because they could not buy the tools, but because nobody had the headcount to wire them together and triage five queues. Compliance leads are a strong secondary audience, particularly at organisations under multiple overlapping regimes that need one control set to answer to all of them.
Onam Security's answer
Onam was built by people who have run incident response, threat hunts and cloud architecture reviews — not by a marketing team that later hired security. The frustration that started it was specific: paying for six products, wiring five dashboards, and still missing the finding that mattered. The conclusion was that fragmentation is not a UI problem to be solved with another dashboard; it is a data-model problem. Findings cannot be correlated if each product holds its own inventory in its own schema. So Onam started at the other end — one inventory, one rule model, one graph — and built the capabilities on top of that rather than bolting them together afterwards.
Onam Security's answer
Python and FastAPI power the backend, with a single backend-for-frontend gateway exposing roughly 166 endpoints across 60 routers, plus Pydantic for validation and SQLAlchemy over PostgreSQL for the inventory and findings data model. Attack-path analysis runs on a Neo4j property graph, per tenant, with roughly 25 catalog-driven edge derivers. All 11,346 posture rules are defined in human-readable YAML and versioned in a catalog — the platform loads and evaluates rules, never hardcodes them. Cloud collection uses provider SDKs and read-only APIs: the AWS SDK, Azure Management API, GCP Cloud Asset API and equivalents. The console is TypeScript, React and Next.js with Tailwind CSS. The platform runs as multi-tenant SaaS.
Share your experience with using Onam Security and GitHub Copilot. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of Onam Security yet. Be the first one to post
GitHub Copilot is a powerful tool that developers use to boost their productivity and streamline their coding process with the aid of AI.
Accelerated handling of repetitive tasks: You already know how to write a pagination query or scaffold an endpoint, so why waste time? Tools like GitHub Copilot or Codeium handle the boilerplate so you can focus on...
GitHub Copilot Chat is similar — you can ask it to explain code or suggest improvements. It's integrated right into VS Code, so it feels pretty seamless. They've been rolling out some new features lately, like better...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking Onam Security since Aug 2026.
I build Browy, an open-source AI agent that lives In a Chrome side panel and a DevTools REPL. It drives the real browser Tabs you have open. The thing it does not have is its own subscription. It uses your existing GitHub Copilot... - Source: dev.to / 26 days ago
Snagly is a free, MIT-licensed set of 30 skills for AI coding agents — GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and 70+ others — that turn "an AI that can drive a browser" into "an AI that tests like a QA professional." A skill, if you... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Where llms.txt genuinely gets read is a different layer: coding and agent tooling — Cursor, Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf — pulling a documentation site's pages with less token waste, plus emerging agent protocols like OpenAI's... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
When comparing Onam Security and GitHub Copilot, you can also consider the following products.

The leading cloud infrastructure security platform that enables organizations to rapidly identify and remove the most pressing risks in the cloud.
Compare Wiz to Onam Security or GitHub Copilot:

The AI-first Code Editor. Build software faster in an editor designed for pair-programming with AI.
Compare Cursor to Onam Security or GitHub Copilot:
Orca.exe is a database table editor for creating and editing Windows Installer packages and merge...
Compare Orca to Onam Security or GitHub Copilot:

Transform hours of debugging into seconds with a single command. Experience coding at thought-speed with Claude's AI that understands your entire codebase—no more context switching, just breakthrough results.
Compare Claude Code to Onam Security or GitHub Copilot:

No-Code Barcode Tracking: Effortlessly create, print, and scan barcodes from any device. Simplify asset and inventory management with real-time data and seamless integrations—no technical expertise required.
Compare Orca Scan to Onam Security or GitHub Copilot:

Tomorrow's editor, today. Windsurf Editor is the first AI agent-powered IDE that keeps developers in the flow. Available today on Mac, Windows, and Linux.
Compare Windsurf Editor to Onam Security or GitHub Copilot: