Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Objects VS Endleaf

Compare Objects VS Endleaf and see what are their differences

Objects

An online tool to create instructions and user manuals for providing quality customer care

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Endleaf

Endleaf is a private reading tracker for iPhone, iPad and Apple Watch. Import your Goodreads or StoryGraph library, log what you read, set a yearly goal, and keep notes and quotes per book. No account, and your library syncs through your own iCloud.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium Free trial $24.99 / Annually (Premium (also $49.99 lifetime))
Alternatives Is it good?
VocaIQ
VocaIQ deploys AI voice agents that answer every call, book appointments, and qualify leads 24/7. From $297/month. Live demo at vocaiq.ai/demo. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Objects
Endleaf
Website objects.to getendleaf.com
Pricing
Official pricing
Freemium Free trial $24.99 / Annually (Premium (also $49.99 lifetime)) Official pricing
Platforms —
iPhone iPad Apple Watch
Company — 2026
Listed in
Customer Care Customer Support SaaS
Books Reading Books & Reference Productivity +1

About Objects and Endleaf

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Objects
Endleaf

No description of Objects yet.

Endleaf is a reading tracker for iPhone, iPad and Apple Watch. It keeps your library on your device and syncs it through your own iCloud, so there is no account to make and no server holding your reading history. Import from Goodreads or StoryGraph and your whole library comes across in a tap,...

Read more about Endleaf

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Objects 5 features
Endleaf 3 features
  • Decentralized Object Storage
    Objects.to provides decentralized storage solutions, allowing users to store data across distributed networks rather than relying on a single centralized server, which enhances data resilience and reduces single points of failure.
  • Web3 and Blockchain Integration
    The platform is designed with Web3 principles in mind, making it well-suited for developers building decentralized applications (dApps) that need reliable and censorship-resistant storage.
  • Simple API and Developer Experience
    Objects.to offers a straightforward API that makes it relatively easy for developers to integrate decentralized storage into their projects without needing deep expertise in the underlying protocols.
  • Content Persistence
    Data stored through Objects.to benefits from content-addressable storage mechanisms, helping ensure that files remain available and verifiable over time without risk of link rot or unauthorized modification.
  • Cost-Effective Storage
    Compared to traditional cloud storage providers, Objects.to can offer competitive pricing by leveraging decentralized storage networks, potentially reducing costs for developers and businesses storing large amounts of data.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Mainstream Adoption
    Objects.to is a relatively niche platform compared to established cloud storage providers like AWS S3 or Google Cloud Storage, which means fewer community resources, tutorials, and third-party integrations are available.
  • Performance and Latency Concerns
    Decentralized storage can sometimes suffer from higher latency and slower retrieval speeds compared to centralized cloud services that have globally distributed CDNs and optimized infrastructure.
  • Reliability and Uptime Uncertainty
    As a smaller and newer platform, Objects.to may not offer the same level of guaranteed uptime and SLAs that enterprise-grade centralized storage providers commit to.
  • Learning Curve for Non-Web3 Developers
    Developers unfamiliar with decentralized storage concepts, content addressing, and Web3 paradigms may face a steeper learning curve when adopting Objects.to compared to traditional storage solutions.
  • Limited Documentation and Support
    Being a smaller platform, Objects.to may have less comprehensive documentation, fewer support channels, and slower response times for troubleshooting compared to major cloud providers with dedicated support teams.
  • Import and Export
    Goodreads and StoryGraph import, JSON and CSV export
  • Ratings
    Half and quarter stars, with sub-ratings for plot, characters, quality and enjoyment
  • Timer
    Reading sessions in pages or minutes, with a lock screen Live Activity

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Objects
Endleaf

Overall verdict

  • Objects.to is a niche link-in-bio and personal landing page tool. It appears to offer a minimalist way to consolidate links, but it has limited brand recognition compared to major competitors like Linktree, Bio.link, or Beacons, and detailed independent reviews or long-term reliability data are scarce.

Why this product is good

  • Simple, minimalist interface for creating a single landing page
  • Likely free or low-cost tier for basic use cases
  • Quick setup for consolidating multiple links in one place
  • Lightweight alternative if you dislike bloated link-in-bio tools

Recommended for

  • Individuals wanting a very basic, no-frills link page
  • Users experimenting with alternatives to mainstream link-in-bio services
  • Small creators who don't need advanced analytics or customization
  • Those prioritizing simplicity over extensive design options

No analysis of Endleaf yet.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Objects
Endleaf
100% 100%
SaaS
0% 0%
0% 0%
Productivity
100% 100%
100% 100%
Customer Support
0% 0%
0% 0%
Books
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Objects and Endleaf.

What makes your product unique?

Endleaf's answer:

The whole tracker is free. Unlimited books and reading sessions, half and quarter star ratings, six statuses, the reading timer, Goodreads and StoryGraph import, and full JSON and CSV export all work without paying and without an account. The library lives on the device and syncs through the reader's own iCloud, so no server of ours ever holds it. Ratings carry optional sub-ratings for plot, characters, quality and enjoyment. Audiobooks are logged in hours and minutes with their own progress bar instead of invented page counts, and approximate dates let someone record a book they finished sometime in 2019.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Endleaf's answer:

Goodreads has no half stars and drops start dates when you export. Bookly puts its reading timer behind a subscription. Endleaf gives half and quarter stars, a timer that runs on the lock screen and in the Dynamic Island, Apple Watch logging, and a full JSON or CSV export on the free tier. There are no ads, no trackers and no feed to scroll. The only request that leaves the device is a title or ISBN sent to look up a cover, and nothing about the reader is stored.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Endleaf's answer:

Readers who keep track of their own reading and want that record private. A lot of them are moving off Goodreads or StoryGraph and bring a CSV with them. They log sessions, set a yearly goal, rate in half stars, and keep quotes and notes per book. Endleaf is built for iPhone, iPad and Apple Watch, needs no account, and works with no connection.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Endleaf's answer:

The iPhone, iPad and Apple Watch apps are written in Swift with SwiftUI. Books and sessions are stored on the device with SwiftData and synced through the reader's own iCloud using CloudKit, so no server of ours holds a library. WidgetKit powers the home and lock screen widgets, ActivityKit runs the reading timer's Live Activity, and StoreKit handles the premium purchase. The website is a static Astro site styled with Tailwind CSS.

User comments

Share your experience with using Objects and Endleaf. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with
Loading...