Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price.
sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, npm
seems to be a lot more popular than Ember-cli.
While we know about 71 links to npm,
we've tracked only 1 mention of Ember-cli.
social mentions
71 vs 1
Front End Package Manager popularity
100% vs 0%
Base details
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
Large Ecosystem npm boasts an extensive library of packages, making it easier for developers to find existing solutions for a wide array of tasks.
Active Community A vibrant and active community ensures continuous updates, support, and improvements for various packages.
Integration with Node.js Seamless integration with Node.js, which makes it the default package manager for Node.js projects.
Version Control Provides robust version control, enabling developers to specify and manage dependencies precisely.
Scripts Allows automation of tasks through custom scripts defined in the package.json file, enhancing development workflow.
Possible disadvantages
Security Issues The open nature can potentially lead to dependency on unvetted or insecure packages, posing security risks.
Deprecation and Abandonment Packages may be deprecated or abandoned by their maintainers, which can disrupt projects that depend on them.
Complex Dependency Management Managing complex dependencies and resolving conflicts between them can sometimes be challenging and time-consuming.
Performance Overhead The sheer size of the node_modules directory can lead to performance overhead and large project sizes.
Quality Variability The quality of packages on npm can vary widely, with some lacking sufficient documentation or tests.
Convention over Configuration Ember-cli enforces strong conventions for file structure, naming, and project organization, which reduces decision fatigue and makes it easier for developers to jump between different Ember projects with minimal onboarding time.
Built-in Tooling Comes with a robust set of built-in tools including a development server, testing framework integration (QUnit), asset compilation, and live reload, reducing the need to manually configure and integrate third-party build tools.
Addon Ecosystem Ember-cli supports a rich ecosystem of addons that can be easily installed and integrated into projects, allowing developers to extend functionality without reinventing the wheel for common features.
Blueprints and Generators Provides powerful generator commands (blueprints) that scaffold components, routes, models, and other application pieces quickly, speeding up development and ensuring consistency across the codebase.
Stable Long-term Support Ember-cli follows Ember's release cycle with clear LTS (Long Term Support) versions, providing stability and predictability for teams maintaining large applications over time.
Possible disadvantages
Steep Learning Curve The strict conventions and unique architecture of Ember-cli can be difficult for newcomers to learn, especially those coming from more flexible frameworks or with no prior Ember experience.
Smaller Community Compared to Alternatives Compared to tools like Vite, Webpack, or CRA used with React/Vue, Ember-cli has a smaller community and ecosystem, which can mean fewer third-party resources, tutorials, and community-driven troubleshooting.
Build Performance For large applications, Ember-cli's build process can become slow, and while improvements have been made with embroider, some developers still report slower build times compared to more modern bundlers.
Rigid Structure The opinionated nature of Ember-cli, while helpful for consistency, can feel restrictive for developers who prefer more flexibility in structuring their applications or adopting non-standard patterns.
Migration Complexity Upgrading between major Ember-cli versions or migrating to newer build systems like Embroider can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for older or heavily customized applications.
Analysis
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
npm
E
Ember-cli
Overall verdict
npm is generally considered good, especially for developers working within the Node.js ecosystem. It simplifies package management, supports extensive version control, and fosters a collaborative environment through its community-driven platform.
Why this product is good
npm (Node Package Manager) is a crucial tool for JavaScript developers. It allows for easy installation, management, and sharing of packages, which can significantly accelerate development time. With a vast repository of open-source libraries, npm provides solutions for countless tasks, reducing the need to build everything from scratch.
Recommended for
JavaScript developers
Node.js developers
Front-end developers using modern JavaScript frameworks
Back-end developers building scalable applications
Overall verdict
Ember CLI is a solid, mature command-line tool for building Ember.js applications, offering strong conventions, built-in tooling, and a stable development workflow that has been refined over many years.
Why this product is good
Provides a standardized project structure and conventions, reducing setup decisions and configuration overhead
Includes built-in support for ES modules, testing, and asset compilation out of the box
Strong addon ecosystem allows easy integration of third-party functionality
Backed by the official Ember.js team, ensuring long-term support and consistent updates
Automatic reloading and rebuilding during development speeds up the workflow
Encourages best practices like testing and modular code organization
Recommended for
Teams building large-scale, maintainable web applications with Ember.js
Developers who prefer convention-over-configuration frameworks
Projects that require long-term stability and structured upgrade paths
Organizations already invested in the Ember.js ecosystem
Developers who value built-in testing and tooling integration without extra setup
There are three components to npm, they are the website, registry and the cli. The npm website is the place where developers discover packages, set up their profiles and also manage the other aspects of npm. The npm...
All packages are organized so that you can keep track of all of the dependencies and their various versions. The registry, website, and command-line interface, or CLI, are the three components of npm. The npm website...
Yrkit: A dev environment that runs on your phone – deploy included
Yr on npm: https://npmjs.com/@yr-lang/yr This is the first time that I am showing this, I have been using it myself and built everything alone. I would love some feedback and tips, and if you would like to be an early adopter, I will be...
- Source: Hacker News
/
5 months ago
The virtuous circle
I started thinking about the idea for npmx late one night (I couldn't sleep, and spotted a Slack message that nerd-sniped me). I posted on Bluesky to ask for people's wishlist for https://npmjs.com – and started building npmx almost...
- Source: dev.to
/
7 months ago
Help! Why does chrome console inner text and my program inner text not return the same values? (spent nearly the whole day trying to extract an element). Turned to reddit as its always had the best community. Any help is MASSIVELY appreciated. Puppeteer!!
The webpage is LinkedIn.com. While this isn’t a framework, I know that are using https://cli.emberjs.com/release/.
Source:
about 5 years ago
Alternatives to npm and Ember-cli
When comparing npm and Ember-cli, you can also consider the following products.
Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.
