Notify Technology VS cppq

• Incident Management
  Digitally capture and centralise incidents, accidents, near misses and positive safety observations in real-time. Automate your investigation processes and track subsequent actions through to completion.
• Audits and Inspections
  Complete audits, schedule and assign actions, and obtain actionable insights whilst on the move, from any mobile device
• Action Tracking
  Centralised management of your health & safety actions across your organisation
• Risk Assessments
  Create and manage digital risk assessments specific to your organisation
• Method Statements
  Use templates to create and publish construction phase plans, risk assessments and method statements
• Safety Intelligence
  View real-time actionable insight by site, region, event, transforming to a proactive safety culture
• Document Management
  Centralise all Health & Safety Management documentation within Notify supporting ISO9001, ISO45001 and ISO14001
• Services
  Our friendly team of experts are on hand to provide guidance, advice and support, as and when you require it

• Lightweight C++ implementation
  cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
• Redis-backed reliability
  Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
• Inspired by proven design (asynq)
  The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
• Native integration for C++ projects
  For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
• Open source and inspectable
  Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited maturity and battle-testing
  Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
• Smaller community and ecosystem
  Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
• Documentation gaps
  As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
• C++ build and dependency complexity
  Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
• Fewer built-in features and tooling
  cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.

Connect 2021: Notify Technology Product Demo

No cppq videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.