Ninja Build VS PostSharp

• Speed
  Ninja is designed for high performance, making it one of the fastest build systems available. It minimizes the time spent on tasks such as parsing, dependency resolution, and build command execution.
• Simplicity
  Ninja’s configuration syntax is straightforward and concise, reducing the complexity involved in setting up builds and allowing for a clear overview of build rules.
• Parallelism
  Ninja excels at handling parallel builds, leveraging multiple cores effectively to decrease overall build times.
• Incremental Builds
  Ninja efficiently handles incremental builds by only recompiling what is necessary, which significantly speeds up iterative development processes.
• Integration
  Ninja is often used as the backend for more complex build systems (e.g., CMake), making it a versatile tool within a larger toolchain.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Features
  Ninja is deliberately minimalist, lacking many of the features found in other build systems, such as built-in support for complex dependency management and custom build steps.
• Learning Curve
  While Ninja itself has a simple syntax, the learning curve can be steep for those unfamiliar with how build systems work or for those coming from more feature-rich environments.
• Dependency on Generators
  Ninja often requires an external generator (like CMake) to create its build files, which can add to the setup complexity and introduce dependencies on other tools.
• Limited Scripting Capabilities
  Unlike some build systems that offer extensive scripting support (e.g., Python in SCons), Ninja's functionality is largely limited to what its syntax and predefined rules allow.
• Less Flexibility
  Due to its minimalist nature, Ninja may not be as flexible as other build systems, potentially limiting its use in more complex or unusual build scenarios.

• Aspect-Oriented Programming (AOP)
  PostSharp allows developers to implement AOP in .NET projects, which helps in separating cross-cutting concerns like logging, error handling, or validation, making the code cleaner and easier to maintain.
• Code Reusability
  By using aspects, developers can write code that can be easily reused across different parts of an application, reducing redundancy and improving efficiency.
• Maintainability
  PostSharp helps to create a more modular codebase. With cross-cutting concerns handled separately, it becomes easier to manage and modify without affecting the core business logic.
• Performance
  PostSharp weaves aspects into compiled code at build time, which generally leads to better runtime performance compared to other AOP approaches that might involve reflection or dynamic proxies.
• Rich Library of Aspects
  It provides a comprehensive library of pre-built aspects like caching, threading, and security, which can accelerate development by reducing the need to implement common functionalities from scratch.

Possible disadvantages

• Learning Curve
  For developers unfamiliar with AOP, there might be a steep learning curve to understand and effectively leverage PostSharp's capabilities.
• Debugging Complexity
  The abstraction layer introduced by aspects can make debugging more challenging as it might not be immediately clear where certain behaviors or errors originate from.
• Cost
  PostSharp is a commercial product with licensing fees, which might be a concern for small projects or organizations with limited budgets.
• Build Time Overhead
  The process of weaving aspects into the code can increase the time taken for builds, which might be noticeable and frustrating for very large projects.
• Vendor Lock-in
  Relying heavily on PostSharp-specific features might lead to challenges if there's a need to switch to a different AOP framework or if PostSharp's development ceases.

FORTNITE STW: HERE IS THE BEST NINJA BUILD (AFTER MONTHS OF TESTING)

Aspect Oriented Programming with PostSharp | Pluralsight

More videos

• CMake Made Simple: A Reusable Template for Your First C++ Project

  On Windows, download the binaries from the cmake and Ninja websites. After that, add the executables to your PATH. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

• TypeScript's Successor is Waiting, and You'll Never Want to Turn Back

  Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

• Using Make – writing less Makefile

  Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

View more

Tracking PostSharp since Mar 2021.