Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Ninja Build VS Codis

Compare Ninja Build VS Codis and see what are their differences

Woopy
incident management, error monitoring, alerting, on-call, devops, developer tools, webhooks, mobile featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Ninja Build logo Ninja Build

Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

Codis logo Codis

Turn your designs into cross-platform code
  • Ninja Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14
  • Codis Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-02

Ninja Build features and specs

  • Speed
    Ninja is designed for high performance, making it one of the fastest build systems available. It minimizes the time spent on tasks such as parsing, dependency resolution, and build command execution.
  • Simplicity
    Ninjaโ€™s configuration syntax is straightforward and concise, reducing the complexity involved in setting up builds and allowing for a clear overview of build rules.
  • Parallelism
    Ninja excels at handling parallel builds, leveraging multiple cores effectively to decrease overall build times.
  • Incremental Builds
    Ninja efficiently handles incremental builds by only recompiling what is necessary, which significantly speeds up iterative development processes.
  • Integration
    Ninja is often used as the backend for more complex build systems (e.g., CMake), making it a versatile tool within a larger toolchain.

Possible disadvantages of Ninja Build

  • Limited Features
    Ninja is deliberately minimalist, lacking many of the features found in other build systems, such as built-in support for complex dependency management and custom build steps.
  • Learning Curve
    While Ninja itself has a simple syntax, the learning curve can be steep for those unfamiliar with how build systems work or for those coming from more feature-rich environments.
  • Dependency on Generators
    Ninja often requires an external generator (like CMake) to create its build files, which can add to the setup complexity and introduce dependencies on other tools.
  • Limited Scripting Capabilities
    Unlike some build systems that offer extensive scripting support (e.g., Python in SCons), Ninja's functionality is largely limited to what its syntax and predefined rules allow.
  • Less Flexibility
    Due to its minimalist nature, Ninja may not be as flexible as other build systems, potentially limiting its use in more complex or unusual build scenarios.

Codis features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis of Ninja Build

Overall verdict

  • Ninja Build is considered a strong choice for users seeking a fast, reliable, and efficient build system. Its simplicity and focus on performance make it appealing to developers working on projects where build speed is critical.

Why this product is good

  • Ninja Build is a high-performance build system designed to handle complex build processes efficiently. It is known for its minimalistic yet powerful design, which allows for faster build times compared to traditional build systems like Make. Its approach to dependency tracking and parallelism is optimized for modern build environments, making it suitable for large codebases and incremental builds.

Recommended for

    Ninja Build is recommended for developers working on large-scale projects with complex build processes, particularly in environments where build speed and efficiency are prioritized. It is especially beneficial for projects that are continuously integrated or require frequent incremental builds.

Ninja Build videos

+ Add

FORTNITE STW: HERE IS THE BEST NINJA BUILD (AFTER MONTHS OF TESTING)

Codis videos

+ Add

Combined DNA Index System CODIS

More videos:

  • Review - How the FBI's DNA database called CODIS helps solve ...
  • Review - Is the CODIS DNA Database useful for genetic genealogy?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Ninja Build and Codis)

Ninja Build

Codis

Front End Package Manager
100 100%
Front End Package Manager
0% 0
Design Collaboration
0 0%
Design Collaboration
100% 100
JS Build Tools
100 100%
JS Build Tools
0% 0
Website Builder
0 0%
Website Builder
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Ninja Build and Codis. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Ninja Build seems to be a lot more popular than Codis. While we know about 23 links to Ninja Build, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Codis. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Ninja Build mentions (23)

  • CMake Made Simple: A Reusable Template for Your First C++ Project
    On Windows, download the binaries from the cmake and Ninja websites. After that, add the executables to your PATH. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • TypeScript's Successor is Waiting, and You'll Never Want to Turn Back
    Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Using Make โ€“ writing less Makefile
    Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: What outdated tech are you still using and are perfectly happy with?
    Really? I thought most new projects were switching to ninja[^1] and have never used it. [^1]: https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • What was used to build C++ programs before Cmake?
    Ninja showed real promise for a while, but then CMake grew up and people stopped seeing a reason to leave it behind. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

Codis mentions (2)

  • Scaling UI Development challenges
    UI code generators that use Machine Learning, such as Codis, can help with scaling UI development by automatically generating code from design specifications. This can save time and reduce the risk of errors by eliminating the need for manual coding of UI elements. By using a code generator, teams can focus on more high-level tasks, such as designing and testing the UI, rather than spending time on low-level... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • How to a Make Flutter Screen in 2 Minutes
    I want to show you, how to generate a Flutter screen in a couple of minutes using Codis (converts Figma design to Flutter code) - a service that currently I'm working on. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Ninja Build and Codis, you can also consider the following products

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

ASDF - Automated Spam Defense Force

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction toolโ€”that is, a next-generation build tool.

NixOS - 25 Jun 2014 . All software components in NixOS are installed using the Nix package manager. Packages in Nix are defined using the nix language to create nix expressions.

npm - npm is a package manager for Node.

Anima App - Design, get feedback, convert to code, publish, iterate.

Loading...