Ninja Build is recommended for developers working on large-scale projects with complex build processes, particularly in environments where build speed and efficiency are prioritized. It is especially beneficial for projects that are continuously integrated or require frequent incremental builds.
Based on our record, Astro Build seems to be a lot more popular than Ninja Build. While we know about 266 links to Astro Build, we've tracked only 23 mentions of Ninja Build. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
On Windows, download the binaries from the cmake and Ninja websites. After that, add the executables to your PATH. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Really? I thought most new projects were switching to ninja[^1] and have never used it. [^1]: https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Ninja showed real promise for a while, but then CMake grew up and people stopped seeing a reason to leave it behind. Source: about 2 years ago
My motivation for completing Frontend Mentor's Contact form challenge was to test-drive my field and form packages. I also recently started using and enjoying Astro so I wanted to explore what it would be like to use it as my frontend workshop environment. I even ended up experimenting with Makefiles, Nushell, and Nix flakes within this project. Overall, I learned a lot and gained some new skills. In this post I'm... - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago
The data from HTTP Archive and Chrome UX Report cited on astro.build gives us a clear picture. Only 44% of WordPress sites pass Core Web Vitals benchmarks, while Astro (unsurprisingly) leads the pack at 63%. - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago
I recently remade my website (I know, I know) and I got a surprise when getting to reimplement an rss feed because, while Astro has a module that helps with generating an rss feed, Nuxt doesn't - at least not for V3 and consequently V4. But worry not, for making one is easy enough ! - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago
For awareness, if you want to build a SSG/SSR frontend, there's also [Astro](https://astro.build/) It lets you ship client islands to the client, which AFAIK is essentially partial hydration. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
Enter Astro. Astro allowed me to build a page from any URL pattern, server-side, include complex js driven divs, but have a 90+ lighthouse score. It still uses tailwindcss it still can use any js modules or functions that the SPA uses. So it was familiar. It did not require a whole re-think. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.
Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.
SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction toolโthat is, a next-generation build tool.
Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps
Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...
Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.