Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Ninja Build VS Astro Build

Compare Ninja Build VS Astro Build and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Ninja Build logo Ninja Build

Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

Astro Build logo Astro Build

Astro is the web framework that you'll love to use.
  • Ninja Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14
  • Astro Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-09

Ninja Build features and specs

  • Speed
    Ninja is designed for high performance, making it one of the fastest build systems available. It minimizes the time spent on tasks such as parsing, dependency resolution, and build command execution.
  • Simplicity
    Ninjaโ€™s configuration syntax is straightforward and concise, reducing the complexity involved in setting up builds and allowing for a clear overview of build rules.
  • Parallelism
    Ninja excels at handling parallel builds, leveraging multiple cores effectively to decrease overall build times.
  • Incremental Builds
    Ninja efficiently handles incremental builds by only recompiling what is necessary, which significantly speeds up iterative development processes.
  • Integration
    Ninja is often used as the backend for more complex build systems (e.g., CMake), making it a versatile tool within a larger toolchain.

Possible disadvantages of Ninja Build

  • Limited Features
    Ninja is deliberately minimalist, lacking many of the features found in other build systems, such as built-in support for complex dependency management and custom build steps.
  • Learning Curve
    While Ninja itself has a simple syntax, the learning curve can be steep for those unfamiliar with how build systems work or for those coming from more feature-rich environments.
  • Dependency on Generators
    Ninja often requires an external generator (like CMake) to create its build files, which can add to the setup complexity and introduce dependencies on other tools.
  • Limited Scripting Capabilities
    Unlike some build systems that offer extensive scripting support (e.g., Python in SCons), Ninja's functionality is largely limited to what its syntax and predefined rules allow.
  • Less Flexibility
    Due to its minimalist nature, Ninja may not be as flexible as other build systems, potentially limiting its use in more complex or unusual build scenarios.

Astro Build features and specs

  • Performance
    Astro Build optimizes for performance by default, loading only the necessary JavaScript on the client-side. This leads to faster page loads and better user experience.
  • Islands Architecture
    Astro's unique 'Islands Architecture' allows for partial hydration, which means you can hydrate only parts of the page that need to be interactive. This minimizes JavaScript usage.
  • Component Framework Agnostic
    Astro supports components from various frameworks like React, Vue, Svelte, and more, making it flexible for developers with different proficiency levels and framework preferences.
  • Static Site Generation (SSG) by Default
    Astro generates static HTML by default, which can be easily deployed to any static site hosting, reducing complexity and server costs.
  • SEO Optimization
    Since Astro builds static HTML, it is highly compatible with search engines, offering better SEO out of the box compared to fully dynamic sites.
  • Developer Experience
    Astro offers a modern development experience with fast build times, hot module replacement (HMR), and a plethora of integrations and plugins.

Possible disadvantages of Astro Build

  • Learning Curve
    Despite its benefits, Astro's unique concepts like 'Islands Architecture' may require some time to learn, especially for developers used to traditional frameworks.
  • Plugin Ecosystem
    While growing, Astro's ecosystem is not as mature as some popular frameworks, which may limit the availability of plugins and third-party integrations.
  • Limited Official Documentation
    The official documentation, although comprehensive, may not cover all edge cases, forcing developers to rely on community support or experimentation.
  • Partial Hydration Complexity
    Managing which parts of the page to hydrate can sometimes become cumbersome, and improperly managed hydration could potentially lead to JavaScript errors.
  • Limited Dynamic Functionality
    Astro is primarily designed for static site generation. Implementing highly dynamic, real-time features may require additional setup and might not be as streamlined as some other frameworks.
  • Community Size
    Being a relatively new framework, Astro's community is smaller compared to giants like React or Angular, which may result in less community-generated content and fewer third-party resources.

Analysis of Ninja Build

Overall verdict

  • Ninja Build is considered a strong choice for users seeking a fast, reliable, and efficient build system. Its simplicity and focus on performance make it appealing to developers working on projects where build speed is critical.

Why this product is good

  • Ninja Build is a high-performance build system designed to handle complex build processes efficiently. It is known for its minimalistic yet powerful design, which allows for faster build times compared to traditional build systems like Make. Its approach to dependency tracking and parallelism is optimized for modern build environments, making it suitable for large codebases and incremental builds.

Recommended for

    Ninja Build is recommended for developers working on large-scale projects with complex build processes, particularly in environments where build speed and efficiency are prioritized. It is especially beneficial for projects that are continuously integrated or require frequent incremental builds.

Analysis of Astro Build

Overall verdict

  • Astro Build is a powerful tool for creating performant and modern web applications, especially suited for content-rich or landing page-focused sites. It offers both efficiency and flexibility, making it a worthwhile option for developers seeking a balance between static site generation and interactivity.

Why this product is good

  • Astro Build is considered a good choice for building modern websites due to its focus on delivering fast loading times and its innovative use of partial hydration. It allows developers to create static sites with dynamic capabilities and optimizes for performance by only sending the necessary JavaScript to the client. Astro supports various popular frameworks like React, Vue, and Svelte, which provides flexibility in development. Additionally, its built-in features for SEO and accessibility make it appealing to developers aiming for high-quality web experiences.

Recommended for

  • Web developers looking for a lightweight framework that emphasizes performance.
  • Projects where SEO and fast loading times are priorities.
  • Developers who need the flexibility to use different JavaScript frameworks within a project.
  • Teams looking to adopt cutting-edge web technologies while maintaining ease of use.

Ninja Build videos

FORTNITE STW: HERE IS THE BEST NINJA BUILD (AFTER MONTHS OF TESTING)

Astro Build videos

I Tried Astro Build and I LOVE IT - 5 Reasons You Will TOO!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Ninja Build and Astro Build)
Front End Package Manager
Website Builder
0 0%
100% 100
JavaScript Package Manager
Blogging
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Ninja Build and Astro Build. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Astro Build seems to be a lot more popular than Ninja Build. While we know about 266 links to Astro Build, we've tracked only 23 mentions of Ninja Build. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Ninja Build mentions (23)

  • CMake Made Simple: A Reusable Template for Your First C++ Project
    On Windows, download the binaries from the cmake and Ninja websites. After that, add the executables to your PATH. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • TypeScript's Successor is Waiting, and You'll Never Want to Turn Back
    Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Using Make โ€“ writing less Makefile
    Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: What outdated tech are you still using and are perfectly happy with?
    Really? I thought most new projects were switching to ninja[^1] and have never used it. [^1]: https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • What was used to build C++ programs before Cmake?
    Ninja showed real promise for a while, but then CMake grew up and people stopped seeing a reason to leave it behind. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

Astro Build mentions (266)

  • Frontend Mentor's Contact form challenge built with Elm
    My motivation for completing Frontend Mentor's Contact form challenge was to test-drive my field and form packages. I also recently started using and enjoying Astro so I wanted to explore what it would be like to use it as my frontend workshop environment. I even ended up experimenting with Makefiles, Nushell, and Nix flakes within this project. Overall, I learned a lot and gained some new skills. In this post I'm... - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago
  • Why Static Site Generators Beat WordPress for Small Business SEO
    The data from HTTP Archive and Chrome UX Report cited on astro.build gives us a clear picture. Only 44% of WordPress sites pass Core Web Vitals benchmarks, while Astro (unsurprisingly) leads the pack at 63%. - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago
  • Making an RSS Feed for a Nuxt Website
    I recently remade my website (I know, I know) and I got a surprise when getting to reimplement an rss feed because, while Astro has a module that helps with generating an rss feed, Nuxt doesn't - at least not for V3 and consequently V4. But worry not, for making one is easy enough ! - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago
  • Next.js Is Infuriating
    For awareness, if you want to build a SSG/SSR frontend, there's also [Astro](https://astro.build/) It lets you ship client islands to the client, which AFAIK is essentially partial hydration. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • The tyranny of google page speed insights
    Enter Astro. Astro allowed me to build a page from any URL pattern, server-side, include complex js driven divs, but have a 90+ lighthouse score. It still uses tailwindcss it still can use any js modules or functions that the SPA uses. So it was familiar. It did not require a whole re-think. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Ninja Build and Astro Build, you can also consider the following products

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction toolโ€”that is, a next-generation build tool.

Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.