Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

NewRelic VS Boxes.dev

Compare NewRelic VS Boxes.dev and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

NewRelic logo NewRelic

New Relic is a Software Analytics company that makes sense of billions of metrics across millions of apps. We help the people who build modern software understand the stories their data is trying to tell them.

Boxes.dev logo Boxes.dev

Run Claude Code and Codex in your own cloud environment
  • NewRelic Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05
Not present

NewRelic features and specs

  • Comprehensive Monitoring
    New Relic provides a wide range of monitoring capabilities including application performance, infrastructure, and real user monitoring, offering a holistic view of your system's health.
  • Real-Time Data
    New Relic offers real-time analytics and insights, enabling quick identification and resolution of issues as they occur.
  • Advanced Alerting
    New Relic's advanced alerting system allows you to set customizable thresholds and get notified through various channels, helping to proactively manage potential issues.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform features an intuitive, user-friendly interface that makes it easy to navigate and visualize data, even for less experienced users.
  • Integration Capabilities
    New Relic integrates seamlessly with many other tools and platforms, making it easy to incorporate into existing workflows.
  • Scalability
    Whether you have a small startup or a large enterprise, New Relic scales easily with your growing needs.
  • Comprehensive Documentation and Support
    New Relic offers extensive documentation and a variety of support options including forums, customer support, and a vibrant community.

Possible disadvantages of NewRelic

  • Cost
    New Relic can be expensive, especially for smaller businesses or startups that may not have a large budget for monitoring tools.
  • Complexity
    While New Relic offers a lot of features, it can also be complex to set up and configure, requiring significant time and expertise.
  • Performance Impact
    In some cases, the agents and monitoring tools can add overhead to the monitored systems, potentially affecting performance.
  • Data Storage Limits
    Lower-tier plans come with limits on data retention and storage, which may not be sufficient for some businesses with high data requirements.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    The breadth of features and capabilities can result in a steep learning curve for new users, making it challenging to fully leverage the platform's potential quickly.

Boxes.dev features and specs

  • Instant macOS Development Environments
    Boxes.dev allows developers to quickly spin up macOS virtual machines for development purposes, significantly reducing the time needed to set up clean development environments compared to manual configuration.
  • Native Apple Silicon Support
    Boxes.dev is built to run natively on Apple Silicon (M1/M2/M3/M4) Macs, leveraging the Apple Virtualization framework for near-native performance without the overhead of traditional emulation.
  • Easy to Use Interface
    The app provides a streamlined, user-friendly interface for creating and managing macOS virtual machines, making virtualization accessible even to developers who aren't familiar with complex VM tooling.
  • Pre-configured Environments
    Boxes.dev offers the ability to create environments with development tools pre-installed or easily configurable, saving developers significant setup time when they need fresh or isolated macOS instances.
  • Snapshot and Restore Capabilities
    Users can take snapshots of their virtual machines and restore them to previous states, which is invaluable for testing, CI/CD workflows, and safely experimenting with system configurations without risk.

Possible disadvantages of Boxes.dev

  • macOS Only
    Boxes.dev is limited to macOS host machines and macOS guest VMs, making it unsuitable for developers who need to run Linux or Windows virtual machines or who work on non-Apple hardware.
  • Paid Software
    Boxes.dev is a commercial product that requires a purchase, which may be a barrier for individual developers or small teams, especially when free alternatives like UTM or raw QEMU exist.
  • Apple Silicon Requirement
    The app primarily targets Apple Silicon Macs, which means developers still using older Intel-based Macs may have limited functionality or may not be able to use the tool at all.
  • Relatively New Product
    As a relatively newer entrant in the virtualization space, Boxes.dev has a smaller community and fewer resources, tutorials, and third-party integrations compared to established tools like Parallels or VMware Fusion.
  • Limited OS Version Support
    Users are generally limited to running macOS versions that Apple's Virtualization framework supports as guests, which can restrict the ability to test on older macOS versions that may still be relevant for compatibility testing.

Analysis of NewRelic

Overall verdict

  • Overall, NewRelic is regarded as a reliable and feature-rich APM solution. Its intuitive user interface, robust monitoring capabilities, and scalability generally receive positive feedback from users. However, it is essential to consider pricing and specific needs, as some users find it expensive compared to other solutions.

Why this product is good

  • NewRelic is considered a good choice for application performance monitoring (APM) because it offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, real-time insights, and detailed analytics. It supports a wide range of programming languages and platforms, and features like distributed tracing, error analytics, and infrastructure monitoring make it a versatile tool for ensuring application reliability and performance.

Recommended for

  • Development teams needing real-time application performance insights
  • Organizations looking to monitor complex distributed applications
  • Businesses that require comprehensive monitoring across different technology stacks
  • Teams focusing on optimizing application availability and performance

Analysis of Boxes.dev

Overall verdict

  • Boxes.dev appears to be a solid developer-focused tool that streamlines workflows, though its overall value depends on your specific technical needs and team size.

Why this product is good

  • Developer-centric design that integrates smoothly into existing coding workflows
  • Aims to reduce setup and configuration overhead so teams can focus on building
  • Modern, clean interface that appeals to technical users
  • Potential for improved collaboration and faster project spin-up

Recommended for

  • Software developers and engineering teams looking to simplify their tooling
  • Startups needing to move quickly with minimal infrastructure setup
  • Technical users who value streamlined, code-first workflows
  • Small to mid-sized teams seeking better collaboration on development projects

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to NewRelic and Boxes.dev)
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Application Performance Monitoring
AI
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using NewRelic and Boxes.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare NewRelic and Boxes.dev

NewRelic Reviews

New Relic vs. Scout: Which Is The Right APM For You?
The top portion of the page is similar between New Relic and Scout: a breakdown of time spent by category (ex: Ruby, Database, External HTTP services, etc) over time. You can view data across similar timeframes in both Scout and New Relic (New Relic offers three months of data in their Pro package and Scout can do the same in their custom plans).
Source: scoutapm.com
Best New Relic Alternatives for Application Performance Monitoring (Cloud & SaaS)
Pingdom Server Monitor, which was formerly Scout Server Monitoring App which was acquired by Pingdom, has superior performance to New Relic, in particular when comparing response times, as seen in comparisons below. Ping Server Monitor comes ahead of New Relic in almost every single Response Time test and benchmark, beating it by almost 20x in terms of overhead.
10 Best Application Monitoring Tools for all Platforms
The NewRelic is a one of the best application performance management and monitoring software that gives you a deep analysis to the app stack. New Relic offers a real-time status checking of the appโ€™s availability. It also gives email alerts and real-time notification.
Source: www.technig.com
Best DataDog Alternatives, Replacements & Competitors for Application & Log Monitoring
New Relic is an application/infrastructure performance management software designed for DevOps. The basic platform gives you real-time insights on the full stack of your cloud apps and infrastructure. New Relic can keep track of your apps whether is on-premises, on the cloud, or in hybrid environments.
Source: www.pcwdld.com
Top 15 Website Monitoring Tools
New Relic is very well known in the performance and developer community for providing a lot of different features and has been around since 2008. New Relic gives you deep performance analytics for every part of your software environment. You can easily view and analyze massive amounts of data, and gain actionable insights in real time. They do provide uptime alerts and...
Source: www.keycdn.com

Boxes.dev Reviews

We have no reviews of Boxes.dev yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, NewRelic seems to be a lot more popular than Boxes.dev. While we know about 109 links to NewRelic, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Boxes.dev. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

NewRelic mentions (109)

  • Best Cloud Monitoring Tools in 2026: A Developer's Honest Comparison
    New Relic rebuilt its pricing around data rather than hosts: you pay for gigabytes of telemetry ingested and for the number of full-platform users, not per monitored host. That change made it one of the more approachable all-in-one platforms for cloud monitoring. Infrastructure, APM, logs, synthetics, and browser monitoring under one meter, across all major clouds. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Best Synthetic Monitoring Tools in 2026: Honest Comparison
    New Relic has the broadest type matrix โ€” seven first-class monitor types including a genuine no-code Step monitor, broken-links, and cert checks โ€” plus serious compliance (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA BAA, FedRAMP Moderate). For regulated teams that need a no-code authoring path, it is a real contender. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • New Relic - CPU usage (%) and Load Average
    At AWS re:Invent 2025, I had the opportunity to give a brief demonstration at the New Relic booth that opened the stage to some AWS Heroes. In Linux environments, administrators often rely on CPU usage and load average metrics to determine whether an instance is appropriately sized. An oversized instance that sits idle wastes resources and drives up the cloud bill, whereas an undersized instance pushed to its... - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Top 5 Trending APM Tools to Explore
    Ideal for: Teams that want comprehensive monitoring without drowning in complexity or cost. Official link:New Relic. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Best AI Coding Tools of 2025: What Tools Should You Use?
    Tembo integrates with observability tools like Sentry, Datadog, and New Relic to detect performance regressions, query slowdowns, and recurring exceptions. When it finds issues, it analyzes recent commits, traces the root cause, and opens pull requests with fixes or optimizations โ€” often before anyone notices the problem. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
View more

Boxes.dev mentions (2)

  • Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX
    Devin Automations is the most obvious one: solid UX, but can get very expensive to run. There are also a bunch of newer startups in this space. I'm building one myself, https://boxes.dev -- we're very early but building for this exact use case. Some other ones worth a look are Factory Droid and Amp Orbs. Those two build their own agent harness (like Cursor), whereas with boxes.dev we run the native codex and... - Source: Hacker News / 2 days ago
  • Mitchellh starts a new company: Superlogical
    These tools all assume you have machines to run the agents on. But for parallel agents I'm pretty convinced you want each agent on its own isolated devbox running your dev environment (not e.g. Worktrees on one box) - which isn't trivial to set up and manage. I'm working this with https://boxes.dev - a workspace for launching and managing claude + codex sessions, each running in its own cloud devbox. We launched... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NewRelic and Boxes.dev, you can also consider the following products

Datadog - See metrics from all of your apps, tools & services in one place with Datadog's cloud monitoring as a service solution. Try it for free.

Codesphere - Deploy in less than 5s

Zabbix - Track, record, alert and visualize performance and availability of IT resources

AppWizzy - Build scalable web apps and websites with AI that serve you for years. Professional vibe-coding platform. Perfect to build SaaS, intenal tool, AI tool, business app, etc

Sentry.io - From error tracking to performance monitoring, developers can see what actually matters, solve quicker, and learn continuously about their applications - from the frontend to the backend.

InstaVM - Instant computers for AI agents