Netmaker
TailScale
ZeroTier
Twingate
NetBird
WireGuard
ngrok
ClearVPN
LoadComplete
WebLOAD
OctoPerf
StresStimulus
LoadView
k6 Cloud
Katalon
Taurus
NetmakerNetmaker's answer
Netmaker's answer
Netmaker is faster, more configurable, cheaper, and can be fully-self hosted. With Netmaker, you're in control.
Netmaker's answer
IT admins, sysadmins, DevOps, InfraOps, platform engineers, and developers.
Netmaker's answer
WireGuard, Golang, and Docker.
Based on our record, Netmaker seems to be a lot more popular than LoadComplete. While we know about 63 links to Netmaker, we've tracked only 1 mention of LoadComplete. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
With Netmaker, you can have greater control and customization by assigning dedicated IP addresses to specific nodes within your network. I just stumble upon it yesterday, check it out. Source: about 3 years ago
These days, I'm trying to deploy full mesh VPN network with netmaker. It is really easy to use and manage. However there are something makes me confused. Source: over 3 years ago
If a TCP based protocol isn't an absolute must have, I'd ditch OpenVPN for Wireguard with some kind of management overlay. e.g netmaker. Source: over 3 years ago
Do the net maker https://github.com/gravitl/netmaker worth trying to use instead of Tailscale? Tailscale is good, but I can watch YouTube over Wi-Fi in another country, but when I try to use Jellyfin to watch movies it’s not loading well. Source: over 3 years ago
Very relatable! At first, I struggled for days trying to make Netmaker or Innernet functional for my personal home server (Raspberry Pi behind multiple routers). But then I stumbled upon ZeroTier, and everything worked seamlessly within a couple of hours. Tailscale was actually the next one on my list because I heard many positive things about it over at r/selfhosted (especially about headscale). However, I did... Source: over 3 years ago
Browser Testing: Hit pages with virtual users performing a flow e.g. Sign up, login. If you want a report of how many "real" users can use your app concurrently, then this testing would give the closest "real" world statistics. Cons - price and requires JS/TS scripting knowledge. Tools: BrowserStorm, Flood.IO, LoadNinja. Source: over 5 years ago
TailScale - Private networks made easy Connect all your devices using WireGuard, without the hassle. Tailscale makes it as easy as installing an app and signing in.
WebLOAD - WebLOAD - The most flexible and cost effective software for enterprise load, stress and performance testing, integrated with DevOps processes. Click for details
ZeroTier - Extremely simple P2P Encrypted VPN
OctoPerf - OctoPerf is an enterprise-grade load testing platform, available as SaaS & on-premise, helping IT teams validate scalability at lower cost.
Twingate - Simply Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)
StresStimulus - Load testing tool for websites and mobile that works with hard-to-test applications.