Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

NetBird VS Gw.run

Compare NetBird VS Gw.run and see what are their differences

Axcrypt
AxCrypt - Password Protect Files With Strong Encryption. AxCrypt is the leading open source file encryption software for Windows. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

NetBird logo NetBird

Connect your devices into a single secure private WireGuard®-based mesh network with SSO/MFA and manage access with just a few clicks.

Gw.run logo Gw.run

Simple and secure access to internal web apps
  • NetBird Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-20
  • Gw.run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-11-14

NetBird features and specs

  • Easy Setup
    NetBird offers a straightforward setup process, which allows users to quickly configure and deploy a secure network without needing extensive technical knowledge.
  • Enhanced Security
    The platform provides robust security features, such as end-to-end encryption and zero-trust architecture, to ensure safe and secure communications across devices and networks.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    NetBird is designed to work across various operating systems, including Windows, macOS, Linux, and more, providing flexibility and interoperability for users with different devices.
  • Scalability
    NetBird allows for easy scaling to accommodate growing networks or expanding user bases, making it suitable for both small teams and larger enterprises.
  • Open-Source
    As an open-source solution, NetBird invites contributions from the community, which can lead to continuous improvements and transparency of its code base.

Possible disadvantages of NetBird

  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    The performance of NetBird can be hindered by poor or unstable internet connections, potentially impacting network speed and reliability.
  • Potential Learning Curve
    While the setup is generally user-friendly, users without prior experience in networking may encounter a learning curve when navigating certain advanced features or integrations.
  • Limited Support Resources
    As a relatively new or niche solution, NetBird might not have an extensive library of support resources, tutorials, or community forums compared to more established networking tools.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Although NetBird is cross-platform, there could be occasional compatibility issues with specific hardware or software configurations that require troubleshooting.
  • Resource Intensity
    Running NetBird's security protocols can consume considerable system resources, which might be a concern for users with older or less powerful devices.

Gw.run features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to NetBird and Gw.run)

NetBird

Gw.run

VPN
100 100%
VPN
0% 0
Localhost Tools
59 59%
Localhost Tools
41% 41
Cloud VPN
100 100%
Cloud VPN
0% 0
Testing
0 0%
Testing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using NetBird and Gw.run. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare NetBird and Gw.run

NetBird Reviews

Self Hosting Like Its 2025
If you’re familiar with Tailscale, you’ll find yourself at ease with NetBird. It acts as a VPN server that handles a WireGuard network on your behalf, significantly reducing complexity. You have the option to self-host or take advantage of their generous free tier on the cloud.
Source: kiranet.org

Gw.run Reviews

We have no reviews of Gw.run yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, NetBird seems to be a lot more popular than Gw.run. While we know about 13 links to NetBird, we've tracked only 1 mention of Gw.run. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

NetBird mentions (13)

  • How to Provide Secure Access to Your Kubernetes Clusters Using an Overlay Network
    Kubernetes is complex. Securing Kubernetes clusters is even more complex. Striking the right balance between granting developers and administrators access to Kubernetes clusters and services while taking care of security is a significant challenge. Overlay networks offer a solution by providing secure, controlled access to your clusters without compromising their protection. In this blog, we’ll explore the... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Tailscale Is Pretty Useful
    Open source alternative: https://netbird.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Tailscale Is Pretty Useful
    Probably the closest to tailscale, optionally selfhosted, and using wireguard meshing would be https://netbird.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Accessing GitHub Action runners using Netbird
    Recently I've been looking at VPN solutions, specifically ones built around WireGuard, that take away some of the manual steps required to manage a large scale deployment. After building proof of concept solutions with several of these offers, I settled on NetBird. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • The New Internet
    Or https://netbird.io which is open-source. You can host the coordination server too :). - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

Gw.run mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NetBird and Gw.run, you can also consider the following products

Headscale - An open source, self-hosted implementation of the Tailscale control server

Pagekite - Bring your localhost servers on-line.

ZeroTier - Extremely simple P2P Encrypted VPN

Raspberry Anywhere - The software provides a simple way teamviewer-like to access your raspberry board anywhere you are.

TailScale - Private networks made easy Connect all your devices using WireGuard, without the hassle. Tailscale makes it as easy as installing an app and signing in.

Packetriot - Serve Apps, Connect Software, Access Devices.

Loading...