Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

mxGraph VS Material Maker

Compare mxGraph VS Material Maker and see what are their differences

Zoviz
Zoviz: Professional Logos, Perfectly Personalized Your Brand. Your Story featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

mxGraph logo mxGraph

mxGraph is a fully client side JavaScript diagramming library - jgraph/mxgraph

Material Maker logo Material Maker

Cross-platform, procedural texture generation tool.
  • mxGraph Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-07
  • Material Maker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-28

mxGraph features and specs

  • Open Source
    mxGraph is an open-source project, which allows developers to use, modify, and distribute the library freely.
  • Cross-Platform
    The library is designed to work seamlessly across multiple platforms (e.g., web browsers, desktop), providing flexibility in application deployment.
  • Rich Feature Set
    mxGraph provides a comprehensive set of features for building interactive diagramming applications, including support for drag-and-drop, undo/redo, zoom, and layout algorithms.
  • Lightweight
    Despite its rich feature set, mxGraph is relatively lightweight, which can yield better performance in terms of speed and resource usage.
  • Good Documentation
    mxGraph offers extensive documentation, making it easier for developers to understand and implement features in their projects.

Possible disadvantages of mxGraph

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its extensive feature set and flexibility, mxGraph might have a steep learning curve for developers who are new to the library.
  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to more mainstream libraries, mxGraph may have a smaller community, potentially limiting the availability of community-based support and resources.
  • Legacy Codebase
    Some parts of mxGraph's codebase may be considered outdated, particularly as newer technologies and frameworks have emerged since its initial development.
  • Complex Customization
    While mxGraph offers powerful customization capabilities, achieving specific custom behaviors and styles can be complex without in-depth knowledge of the library.
  • Sparse Ecosystem
    As a specialized library, it may have fewer third-party plugins and extensions compared to more widely-adopted graph libraries.

Material Maker features and specs

  • Free and Open Source
    Material Maker is available for free and is open source, allowing users to modify and contribute to the software, making it accessible to a wide range of users without financial barriers.
  • Node-Based Workflow
    The software provides a node-based workflow which allows for ease of use and powerful procedural texturing, making it simple for users to create complex materials efficiently.
  • Integration with Godot Engine
    Material Maker integrates well with the Godot Engine, facilitating smooth workflows for game developers who use this popular open-source game engine.
  • Community Support
    A growing community of users contributes to the sharing of tips, resources, and materials, providing a supportive environment for learning and expanding skills.
  • Cross-Platform
    Material Maker is available on multiple platforms, including Windows, MacOS, and Linux, offering flexibility for users across different operating systems.

Possible disadvantages of Material Maker

  • Steep Learning Curve
    While powerful, the node-based system can be complex for beginners, requiring a significant investment of time to become proficient.
  • Limited Documentation
    The available documentation can be sparse, potentially leading to challenges in understanding all features and tools available in the software.
  • Performance Issues on Large Projects
    Some users have reported performance slowdowns when working on larger or more complex projects, which can hinder workflow efficiency.
  • Less Polished Interface
    Compared to commercial alternatives, Material Maker may have a less polished UI, which might impact the user experience.
  • Limited Features Compared to Paid Tools
    Material Maker may lack some advanced features offered by commercial texturing software, which could be a limitation for professional users seeking specific capabilities.

Analysis of Material Maker

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Material Maker is considered a good tool, especially for those looking for a cost-effective solution to create procedural textures. Its features and user-friendly design make it a solid choice for both beginners and experienced users in the field.

Why this product is good

  • Material Maker is a popular tool among 3D artists and game developers for creating procedural textures and materials. It is praised for being open-source and free, making it accessible to a wide audience. Users appreciate its node-based interface, which is similar to other industry-standard software, allowing for a smooth learning curve. The software is also valued for its capability to produce high-quality textures that can be used in various 3D modeling and game development projects. Regular updates and a supportive community contribute to its positive reception.

Recommended for

    Material Maker is recommended for 3D artists, game developers, and hobbyists who are interested in creating procedural materials and textures without incurring high software costs. It is also suitable for educators and students who require an accessible and powerful tool for learning and teaching purposes in digital art and design.

mxGraph videos

+ Add

mxGraph Made Easy 3

Material Maker videos

+ Add

Material Maker 0.8 Released -- Now with more better!

More videos:

  • Review - Material Maker -- Godot Powered Procedural Texture Creator (Free & Open Source!)
  • Review - Material Maker & Pixelorama -- Godot Powered Open Source GameDev Goodness!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to mxGraph and Material Maker)

mxGraph

Material Maker

Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
Javascript UI Libraries
0% 0
3D
0 0%
3D
100% 100
Development
100 100%
Development
0% 0
Architecture
0 0%
Architecture
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using mxGraph and Material Maker. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare mxGraph and Material Maker

mxGraph Reviews

20+ JavaScript libraries to draw your own diagrams (2022 edition)
mxGraph uses no third-party software, it requires no plugins and can be integrated into virtually any framework. The mxGraph package contains a client software, written in JavaScript, and a series of backends for various languages. The client software is a graph component with an optional application wrapper that is integrated into an existing web interface. The client...
Source: modeling-languages.com

Material Maker Reviews

We have no reviews of Material Maker yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Material Maker should be more popular than mxGraph. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

mxGraph mentions (2)

  • Process Analytics - March 2022 News
    It is possible to use the new API to retrieve the bpmn-visualization and mxGraph versions used at runtime: getVersion(). - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • mxGraph usage in TypeScript projects
    This article is the first one of a series about mxGraph, the Javascript diagramming library. - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago

Material Maker mentions (8)

  • Underw[A]ter [OC]
    In a software called material maker, this is the setup(slightly different but this basically just offsets the textures). Source: about 3 years ago
  • Godot showing off a texture I made in material maker
    Did you find it? Here it is if you didn't. It's made in Godot. Source: over 3 years ago
  • How would you go about modeling this?
    โ€œName your own priceโ€ alternative based on the Godot engine https://rodzilla.itch.io/material-maker. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Helmet Hud Test Godot 4 FPS
    Helmet overlay was made using material maker. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Has anyone been able to run Substance Designer on the steam deck?
    No idea about that one but Material Maker works great! Source: about 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing mxGraph and Material Maker, you can also consider the following products

GoJS - GoJS is a JavaScript library for building interactive diagrams on HTML web pages. Build apps with flowcharts, org charts, BPMN, UML, modeling, and other visual graph types.

Substance Designer - Substance Designer is a node-based non-destructive application for material authoring.

Paper.js - Open source vector graphics scripting framework that runs on top of the HTML5 Canvas.

TextureLab - Free, Cross-Platform, GPU-Accelerated Procedural Texture Generator.

jsPlumb - jsPlumb is an advanced, standards-compliant and easy to use JS library for building connectivity based applications, such as flowcharts, process flow diagrams, sequence diagrams, organisation charts, etc. More than just a diagram library.

Filter Forge - On the surface, Filter Forge is just a Photoshop plugin, a pack of filters that generate textures...

Loading...