mtm VS GNU Screen

• Lightweight
  MTM is a minimal terminal multiplexer, so it consumes significantly less memory and resources compared to more feature-rich multiplexers like tmux or screen.
• Simplicity
  MTM has a simple design with fewer features, making it easy to use for basic session management without getting overwhelmed by options.
• Fast Setup
  Due to its minimalistic nature, MTM is easy and quick to set up, requiring minimal configuration to start using.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Features
  MTM lacks many of the advanced features found in other multiplexer tools, such as scripting capabilities and plugin support, which might be essential for some users.
• Basic Interface
  The interface of MTM is quite basic and may not be as user-friendly or visually appealing as other multiplexers that offer more customization and layout options.
• Community and Support
  Being a lesser-known tool, MTM might have a smaller community and fewer resources for troubleshooting issues compared to more popular terminal multiplexers.

• Session Management
  GNU Screen allows you to detach and reattach sessions, making it possible to keep applications running in the background even if you disconnect from a terminal session.
• Multiple Windows
  It provides the ability to open multiple windows within a single terminal session, allowing you to manage different tasks concurrently without opening additional shell instances.
• Terminal Sharing
  Screen supports terminal sharing, enabling multiple users to view and interact with the same terminal session, which is useful for collaborative work and troubleshooting.
• Scrollback History
  You have access to scrollback history, allowing you to review command output and logs even after they've disappeared from view in the normal terminal.
• Customizability
  GNU Screen provides extensive options for customization through its configuration file, enabling users to tailor keybindings, appearances, and functionalities to their preferences.
• Resource Efficiency
  Being a text-based application, GNU Screen is extremely light on system resources, making it suitable for use on systems with limited computational power or memory.

Possible disadvantages

• Steep Learning Curve
  New users may find GNU Screen's interface and command syntax difficult to learn and use efficiently, especially without dedicated tutorials or documentation.
• Outdated User Interface
  Compared to more modern terminal multiplexers like tmux, GNU Screen may feel outdated in terms of user interfaces and ease of use.
• Limited Functionality
  While robust for basic session management, GNU Screen lacks some of the advanced functionalities and features found in newer tools, such as better scripting integrations and extended multi-pane support.
• Configuration Complexity
  The process of configuring the .screenrc file to achieve certain custom setups can be cumbersome and unintuitive for some users.
• Competition from Alternatives
  Alternatives like tmux offer similar functionalities with more modern features, resulting in a decline in the usage of GNU Screen among new users.

iLoud MTM _(Z Reviews)_ These Make Me Cry 💦💦

More videos

GNU Screen

• Building off the linux kernel

  You can try looking at projects like mtm to get an idea of what is needed. Source: over 4 years ago

• Zellij – A Terminal Workspace and Multiplexer Written in Rust

  Besides tmux you can also try * mtm: https://github.com/deadpixi/mtm. - Source: Hacker News / over 5 years ago

• Any mtm hackers?

  I have been using tmux for a while, and to be frank it is not that great. I constantly have issues with the copy and paste modes, it always spawns a session handler which I often don't want, it is all around pain in the ass. I tried... Source: over 5 years ago

Tracking GNU Screen since Mar 2021.