MonoLisa
Input Mono
CodeStream
Hack Lang
Font Generator
Devicons
Braille Neue Typeface
Font for programming and code review

Exercise dataset for fitness apps: transparent background, animations, no subscription
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Mononoki Typeface seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 5 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
MT
Mononoki Typeface
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | madmalik.github.io | repdb.co |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

No description of Mononoki Typeface yet.
RepDB is a one-time-purchase exercise dataset with animations for developers building fitness and workout apps — not a subscription, not a rate-limited API. You download the data once and own it: JSON (and SQLite on the higher tier), WebP images, and full EN/DE/ES translations, with no...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Possible disadvantages
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

As answered by people managing Mononoki Typeface and RepDB.
RepDB's answer:
RepDB is sold as a one-time download, not a metered API — you own the JSON/SQLite data and WebP images outright, with no rate limits, no per-request billing, and no risk of the vendor cutting off access. It's also the only dataset in this space with EN/DE/ES translations, transparent (alpha-channel) images with no watermark, muscle-group highlighting, safety/goal tags, and looping animations on the higher tier.
RepDB's answer:
RepDB grew out of a consumer workout app its creator was building solo. Sourcing exercise images and data meant either paying for a subscription API with usage caps and no caching rights, or producing everything from scratch. The illustrated, multi-language dataset was built for us first, then split out as its own product once it became clear other indie developers had the same problem and preferred to buy the data outright rather than rent it through an API.
RepDB's answer:
Most alternatives are subscription APIs — you pay monthly, you're capped on requests, and ExerciseDB's terms of use explicitly forbid caching or storing the data at all, so every image render is a live paid API call. RepDB is the opposite: pay once, download the files, self-host with zero ongoing dependency. It's also the only option offering true DE/ES localization and transparent images instead of a white box behind every exercise.
RepDB's answer:
Solo developers and small teams building fitness or workout-tracking apps (iOS, Android, web) who need licensed exercise images and structured exercise data, but don't want to build their own media pipeline or depend on a rate-limited third-party API.
Share your experience with using Mononoki Typeface and RepDB. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

The font in the second panel is mononoki. Source: over 4 years ago
Mononoki is my recent favorite (unmentioned yet, but surely popular). https://madmalik.github.io/mononoki/ Monofur is a wild font I'm mildly surprised was omitted. I did use it full-time for a while maybe 10 years ago, but it's... - Source: Hacker News / about 5 years ago
Mononoki is my latest find and it's awesome. Source: about 5 years ago
Tracking RepDB since Jul 2026.
When comparing Mononoki Typeface and RepDB, you can also consider the following products.


CodeStream helps development teams resolve issues faster, and improve code quality by streamlining code reviews inside your IDE
Compare CodeStream to Mononoki Typeface or RepDB:

A programming language for HHVM that interoperates seamlessly with PHP
Compare Hack Lang to Mononoki Typeface or RepDB:
Tons of font ideas in one click
Compare Font Generator to Mononoki Typeface or RepDB:

Iconic font made for developers, code jedis, and designers
Compare Devicons to Mononoki Typeface or RepDB: