
Beeceptor
WireMock
MockServer
MockAPI
Postman
WireMock Cloud
Requestly
Mockoon is the easiest and quickest way to design and run mock REST APIs. No remote deployment, no account required, free and open-source.

Apidog
Beeceptor
WireMock
Postman
MockAPI
MockServer
MockServer.in
Create dynamic mock APIs in seconds, with stateful CRUD and a live request inspector. No signup to try.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Mockoon seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 35 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | mockoon.com | mockbase.org |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | Startup from Luxembourg · 1 - 9 employees · 2017 | 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Mockoon yet.
MockBase is a hosted API mocking tool: click once and get a live HTTPS endpoint you can point a frontend, mobile app, or CI pipeline at, before the real backend exists. Each mock supports multiple routes, each with its own status code, response body, and optional delay, and can go well beyond...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Mockoon is recommended for developers, QA testers, and software teams who require fast and reliable mock APIs for testing or development, as well as those who prefer a lightweight, standalone solution that can be run locally on their machines.
No analysis of MockBase yet.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Mockoon and MockBase.
MockBase's answer:
MockBase is currently in public beta — there isn't a public customer list yet.
MockBase's answer:
Most mock API tools make you pick one thing: a local desktop app (Mockoon), a zero-setup hosted stub (Beeceptor), or a spec-driven mock tied to a collection (Postman). MockBase puts conditional matching, sandboxed Jinja2 templating, stateful CRUD (a mock that actually remembers what you POSTed to it), chaos injection, and OpenAPI import/export into one hosted endpoint, with a live WebSocket request inspector on every mock. It's usable with zero signup — one click gets you a working endpoint with sample routes already on it.
MockBase's answer:
If you need more than "return this JSON" — a mock that behaves differently based on a header, remembers what you created and lets you read it back, or fails on purpose at a rate you control to test retry logic — that combination usually means stitching together a local tool plus custom code. MockBase bundles it into one hosted URL your whole team (or a CI pipeline) can hit, without anyone running a local server.
MockBase's answer:
Frontend and mobile developers who need to build against an API before the backend is ready, QA/test engineers who need to reproduce specific error conditions (timeouts, rate limits, partial failures) that are hard to trigger against a real dependency on demand, and teams doing API-first development who want to agree on a contract and start building in parallel instead of waiting.
MockBase's answer:
Frontend work rarely waits for backend work to finish, and standing up a throwaway server just to unblock yourself is its own chore — dependencies, a port to remember, a process to keep alive. MockBase exists for that specific moment: a live endpoint in seconds, no server to babysit. It's deliberately narrow — not a full API platform with design, docs, and team management bundled in, just mocking, done well enough (dynamic responses, statefulness, realistic failure injection) to actually build and test against.
MockBase's answer:
Python (FastAPI) on the backend with Redis for the hot-path mock configuration, request logs, and state storage, and PostgreSQL for accounts and content. The frontend is React with Vite and Tailwind CSS. Dynamic response templating runs on a sandboxed Jinja2 environment.
Share your experience with using Mockoon and MockBase. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Email: guillaume[at]1kb.software While bootstrapping http://mockoon.com I'm freelancing to keep the lights on. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Mockoon: This open-source desktop application offers a fast setup with a user-friendly interface. It excels at creating customizable responses and supports multiple environments without requiring complex configuration. Mockoon is... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Mocking: Help your front-end team discover integration or design issues Early in the API development process by mocking your API endpoints. You can either due this directly from your gateway, or use a service like Mockoon. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Tracking MockBase since Sep 2026.
When comparing Mockoon and MockBase, you can also consider the following products.

Unblock yourself from API dependencies, and build & integrate with APIs fast. Beeceptor helps you build a mock Rest API in a few seconds.
Compare Beeceptor to Mockoon or MockBase:

All-in-One workspace for API Design, Documentation, Debug, Mock, Test
Compare Apidog to Mockoon or MockBase:

WireMock - a web service test double for all occasions.
Compare WireMock to Mockoon or MockBase:

Easy mocking of any system you integrate with via HTTP or HTTPS.
Compare MockServer to Mockoon or MockBase:

MockAPI lets users mock up APIs, generate custom data, and perform operations on it using RESTful interface.
Compare MockAPI to Mockoon or MockBase:
