Software Alternatives & Startups

mkusb VS Clonezilla

Compare mkusb VS Clonezilla and see what are their differences

mkusb

(Straight up rufus for Linux users ) The mkusb tool was developed to make it simpler and safer to create boot drives with the method to flash or clone an iso image or a compressed image file. It is using dd under the hood.

Rating
0 reviews
Clonezilla

Clonezilla is a suite of software that's designed to allow you to back-up and image new hard drives with your data.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Clonezilla should be more popular than mkusb. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
1 vs 2
Bootable USB popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
53 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

mkusb
Clonezilla
Website github.com sourceforge.net
Pricing
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

mkusb 5 features
Clonezilla 5 features
  • User-Friendly Interface
    mkusb provides an easy-to-understand graphical user interface, making it accessible for users who may not be comfortable with command-line tools.
  • Versatility
    The tool supports a wide range of Linux distributions, offering users the ability to create bootable USB drives for various purposes, such as installing an OS or creating a live boot environment.
  • Persistence Feature
    mkusb allows users to set up persistent storage on the USB drive, which means that changes and files can be saved across reboots.
  • Safety Mechanisms
    The tool implements safety checks to prevent accidental data loss by ensuring users have the opportunity to confirm their actions before any changes to the drive are made.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    mkusb is compatible with various operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, which makes it a versatile tool for users regardless of their primary OS.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Advanced Features
    While mkusb offers all the necessary features for average users, it may lack some advanced features that more experienced users might require.
  • Performance
    The speed of creating bootable USB drives with mkusb may not be as fast as some other dedicated command-line tools, potentially making it a less efficient choice for users who need to create multiple drives quickly.
  • Dependency on External Libraries
    mkusb relies on certain external libraries and tools, which may cause compatibility issues or require additional installations on some systems.
  • Resource Intensive
    The graphical nature of mkusb can make it slightly more resource-intensive compared to command-line only alternatives, which might be a consideration for users with older hardware.
  • Less Frequent Updates
    The tool might not receive updates as frequently as some other more community-active projects, potentially leading to slower integration of new features or bug fixes.
  • Free and Open Source
    Clonezilla is available for free and the source code can be reviewed, modified, and distributed by users.
  • Wide Compatibility
    Works with a variety of file systems including ext2, ext3, ext4, reiserfs, xfs, jfs for Linux, and NTFS for Windows.
  • High Performance
    Utilizes programs like Partclone, Partimage, and ntfsclone, which offer efficient cloning and imaging capabilities.
  • Flexible and Powerful
    Provides numerous advanced options and features for power users, including unattended modes and network cloning.
  • Broad Hardware Support
    Compatible with various types of hardware, and can clone a single machine as well as multiple machines simultaneously.

Possible disadvantages

  • User Interface
    The interface is not very user-friendly and can be challenging for beginners to navigate.
  • Complexity
    Offers a steep learning curve with numerous advanced features and command-line options that may overwhelm novice users.
  • Limited Incremental/Differential Backup
    Does not support incremental or differential backups natively, requiring full backups each time.
  • Limited Support
    Support mainly comes from community forums and documentation, which may not be as reliable or fast as paid technical support.
  • Boot Media Requirement
    Requires creating and booting from live media (CD/USB) for operation, which might be inconvenient for some users.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

mkusb
Clonezilla

No analysis of mkusb yet.

Overall verdict

  • Clonezilla is considered a good tool for those who need a powerful, flexible, and cost-effective solution for disk imaging and cloning tasks. It is particularly well-suited for IT professionals and system administrators who need to manage multiple systems. However, it requires some technical know-how, so it may not be the best fit for users who prefer a more graphical, user-friendly interface.

Why this product is good

  • Clonezilla is highly regarded for its efficiency and reliability in cloning and imaging computer systems. It supports a wide range of file systems and is capable of handling both Linux and Windows partitions. The tool is open-source, which means it is free to use and continuously improved by a community of developers. It offers advanced features like multicasting, unattended mode, and the ability to encrypt images for added security. Users appreciate its robustness and the fact that it can perform full and incremental backups efficiently.

Recommended for

    Clonezilla is recommended for IT professionals, system administrators, and tech-savvy users who need a reliable and cost-effective solution for cloning and imaging tasks. It is ideal for those who are comfortable working with command-line interfaces and require support for a wide range of file systems and disk formats.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

mkusb 3 videos + Add
Clonezilla 3 videos + Add

Make a persistent Linux usb drive with mkusb

More videos

  • - mkusb, a tutorial on how to burn isos to usbs in less than 5
  • - How to install mkusb on Linux Mint 20.2

Clonezilla vs Acronis

More videos

  • - Clonezilla Tutorial: How to back up or clone your PC's HDD or SSD
  • - Cloning hard drives with Clonezilla!

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
mkusb
Clonezilla
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using mkusb and Clonezilla. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

mkusb no reviews yet
Clonezilla no reviews yet

We have no reviews of mkusb yet. Be the first one to post

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

mkusb 1 mention
Clonezilla 2 mentions
  • Ubuntu's version of mksub on Arch?
    Hello everyone, I have previously used mkusb and mkusb-dus on Ubuntu to make live USB sticks for various distros. However, I can't find that version available for Arch. I've found the githubversion on the AUR, but the github version... Source: over 5 years ago
  • Upgrading mass storage on laptop and keeping windows license
    Cloning drive using https://sourceforge.net/projects/clonezilla/ should work. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Best OS for Java dev
    It wakes your machine up (if properly setup) and performs a incremental backup during the night. There are other ways using free software but they are advanced and mostly only worth if you want to learn how to get those things work. Source: over 4 years ago

Alternatives to mkusb and Clonezilla

When comparing mkusb and Clonezilla, you can also consider the following products.