Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

MiniPACS VS ReplyMap

Compare MiniPACS VS ReplyMap and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

MiniPACS logo MiniPACS

Independent radiology and imaging centers reading DICOM in-house: radiologists, PACS admins, and front-desk staff needing a self-hosted archive, browser viewer, and voice reporting.

ReplyMap logo ReplyMap

Social media management that doesn't suck.
  • MiniPACS
    Image date //
    2026-08-10
  • MiniPACS
    Image date //
    2026-08-10
  • MiniPACS
    Image date //
    2026-08-10
  • MiniPACS
    Image date //
    2026-08-10
  • MiniPACS
    Image date //
    2026-08-10
  • MiniPACS
    Image date //
    2026-08-10
  • MiniPACS
    Image date //
    2026-08-10
  • MiniPACS
    Image date //
    2026-08-10
  • MiniPACS
    Image date //
    2026-08-10
  • MiniPACS
    Image date //
    2026-08-10
  • MiniPACS
    Image date //
    2026-08-10
  • MiniPACS
    Image date //
    2026-08-10
  • MiniPACS
    Image date //
    2026-08-10
  • MiniPACS
    Image date //
    2026-08-10
  • MiniPACS
    Image date //
    2026-08-10
  • MiniPACS
    Image date //
    2026-08-10

MiniPACS is a self-hosted PACS built for independent radiology and imaging centers that would rather own their archive than rent cloud storage by the study. It ingests standard DICOM C-STORE from any modality (CT, MR, US, XR and more) and opens every study in the browser with a built-in viewer that loads in under a second, so reading never waits on a workstation. Radiologists dictate reports by voice, use structured templates and dot-phrase macros, sign them as DICOM PDFs that travel inside the study, and hand patients a PIN-protected share link or a self-contained disc that opens on any computer. The whole stack runs on one mini PC with Docker, with AES-256 encrypted backups, an editable RBAC matrix, a self-service HIPAA Accounting of Disclosures report, and a hash-chained append-only audit log you can verify from the browser. $300 per location per month, flat, no per-study fees. One-click live demo.

Not present

MiniPACS

$ Details
paid $300 / Annually (MiniPACS full)
Platforms
Linux Windows MacOS Web Mobile
Release Date
2026 June
Startup details
Country
United States
State
New York
City
Brooklyn
Founder(s)
Tim Hunt
Employees
1 - 9

ReplyMap

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

MiniPACS features and specs

  • Zero-install browser DICOM viewer
    opens in under a second
  • DICOM C-STORE / C-ECHO ingest from any modality
    CT, MR, US, XR, DX, MG, NM, PT, RF, XA
  • Signed reports as DICOM Encapsulated PDF
    draft โ†’ sign โ†’ addendum lifecycle
  • Patient sharing: expiry, optional PIN, QR, branded guest portal that opens on any phone
    patient portal
  • Burn to CD/USB or ISO with DICOMDIR
    opens in Weasis/OsiriX/RadiAnt, no import
  • Bulk drag-and-drop import
    resumable, dedup, retry history
  • Built-in structured reporting with voice dictation, templates, dot-phrase macros, live letterhead PDF preview
    report generation
  • Clinic-to-clinic Send to PACS with self-healing retry + C-ECHO pre-test
    send to nodes or gateway nodes
  • Self-service Gateway agent for branch clinics with no static IP
    no static IP? no problem
  • Editable RBAC matrix, instant session revocation
    Role Managment
  • HIPAA tooling
    Accounting of Disclosures (CSV), hash-chained append-only audit log verifiable in UI
  • Self-hosted on a mini PC
    (Docker/Linux), AES-256 encrypted backups, self-updater with verified rollback

ReplyMap features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis of ReplyMap

Overall verdict

  • ReplyMap appears to be a niche tool aimed at streamlining outreach and reply management, and it seems reasonably good for teams or individuals who need a straightforward way to organize and speed up responses without heavy overhead, though it may lack advanced features found in larger, more established platforms.

Why this product is good

  • Simplifies tracking and organizing replies from multiple sources in one place
  • Offers a relatively low learning curve compared to full-scale CRM or helpdesk systems
  • Likely cost-effective for small teams or solo users given its focused feature set
  • Can help improve response times by centralizing communication threads

Recommended for

  • Small businesses or solo entrepreneurs managing customer or lead replies
  • Sales or support teams looking for a lightweight alternative to complex CRMs
  • Users who need quick setup without extensive onboarding
  • Teams prioritizing simplicity over an extensive feature list

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MiniPACS and ReplyMap)
Healthcare
100 100%
0% 0
Travel
0 0%
100% 100
Health
100 100%
0% 0
Flights Search
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using MiniPACS and ReplyMap. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MiniPACS and ReplyMap, you can also consider the following products

ASPYRA PACS - ASPYRA PACS offers flexible imaging solutions for specialtyโ€‹ practices likeย Orthopedics and healthcare facilities.

CDR DICOM 5 - Dental Imaging

CrelioHealth PACS - CrelioHealth PACS is an optimal solution for radiology reporting of X-rays, ultrasound, MRI scan, CT scan, PET scan, fluoroscopy, nuclear medicine, and angiography in radiology centers and hospitals.

DeepHealth PACS - Customizable, web-based radiology imaging workflow solution

DICOMetrix - Site for selling PACS Performance Monitoring and analysis softwares

dicompyler - Extensible, fully open source radiation therapy research platform and viewer for DICOM and DICOM RT.