Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Midnight Commander VS Codekeeper

Compare Midnight Commander VS Codekeeper and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Midnight Commander logo Midnight Commander

GNU Midnight Commander is a visual file manager, licensed under GNU General Public License and...

Codekeeper logo Codekeeper

Source code escrow for developers
  • Midnight Commander Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29
  • Codekeeper Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05

Midnight Commander features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Midnight Commander provides a text-based user interface that is relatively easy to navigate, unlike traditional command-line interfaces, which can be intimidating for new users.
  • Two-pane File Manager
    The dual-pane layout allows users to perform file operations such as moving and copying files between two locations effortlessly.
  • Built-in Editor
    Midnight Commander includes a built-in text editor (mcedit) that can be handy for quickly editing configuration files or scripts.
  • Connectivity Options
    It supports various network protocols like FTP, SFTP, and Samba, enabling users to manage files on remote systems as easily as on local drives.
  • Customizability
    Users can customize key bindings, color schemes, and panels to better suit their needs and workflow preferences.
  • Cross-Platform
    Midnight Commander is available on multiple operating systems, including Linux, macOS, and Windows, offering a consistent experience across platforms.
  • Search Capabilities
    Advanced search options make it easy to find files and text within files, which is useful for a variety of tasks, from coding to administration.

Possible disadvantages of Midnight Commander

  • Limited GUI Features
    Being a text-based application, it lacks some of the graphical features and mouse interactions available in graphical file managers.
  • Learning Curve
    While more user-friendly than the command line, it still requires some time to learn and get accustomed to the various key bindings and functionalities.
  • Dependency on Terminal
    As a terminal-based application, it requires a terminal emulator, which might not be as efficient or convenient as using a native graphical application for some users.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    For complex file management tasks, it may not offer the advanced features or plugins available in more robust file managers.
  • No Built-in Preview
    Unlike some graphical file managers, it doesn't provide a built-in preview of files (like images or PDFs), which can be a drawback for certain use cases.
  • Dependency on Configuration Files
    Customization often necessitates editing configuration files manually, which could be a deterrent for users who are not comfortable with text-based configurations.

Codekeeper features and specs

  • Cloud-based Access
    Codekeeper is a cloud-based service, making it accessible from anywhere, which is convenient for remote teams and developers working across different locations.
  • High Security
    Offers secure version control with robust security features, ensuring that the source code is protected from unauthorized access.
  • Automated Backups
    Provides automated backup solutions, allowing users to easily schedule backups and ensure data integrity.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Can be integrated with various other tools and services, enhancing its utility and allowing teams to streamline their workflows.
  • User-friendly Interface
    Comes with an easy-to-use interface that helps users quickly navigate and manage their code repositories.

Possible disadvantages of Codekeeper

  • Cost
    The service might be costly for smaller teams or individual developers, especially when compared to free alternatives.
  • Limited Offline Functionality
    Being cloud-based means there may be limited capability for offline access, which could be a drawback in environments with unreliable internet connections.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may experience a learning curve associated with understanding and fully utilizing all of Codekeeper's features.
  • Dependence on Internet
    Access and functionality are heavily dependent on a stable internet connection, which might hinder use during outages.
  • Customization Limitations
    There may be limited scope for customization according to specific needs, as compared to some more flexible self-hosted solutions.

Analysis of Midnight Commander

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Midnight Commander is considered a good tool by many users, especially those who frequently work in command-line environments. Its efficiency and robustness make it a favorite among system administrators and developers.

Why this product is good

  • Midnight Commander is a popular and powerful file manager for Unix-like systems. It features a text user interface, making it suitable for command-line environments. It provides all essential file management functionalities, including copying, moving, renaming, and even supports accessing and browsing through FTP or SSH, making it versatile for various tasks.

Recommended for

    Midnight Commander is highly recommended for users who are comfortable working in command-line environments. It is particularly suitable for system administrators, developers, and power users who need a reliable and efficient file management tool with advanced features like remote file system browsing.

Midnight Commander videos

EzeeLinux Show 18.15 | GNU Midnight Commander

More videos:

  • Review - 16 - Midnight Commander, Part 1 of 3
  • Review - Midnight Commander || Installation and short review || Ubuntu || Fedora

Codekeeper videos

Codekeeper - Source Code Escrow Platform Demo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Midnight Commander and Codekeeper)
File Manager
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100
FTP Client
100 100%
0% 0
Copyrights, Patents And IP Services

User comments

Share your experience with using Midnight Commander and Codekeeper. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Midnight Commander seems to be a lot more popular than Codekeeper. While we know about 28 links to Midnight Commander, we've tracked only 1 mention of Codekeeper. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Midnight Commander mentions (28)

  • Emacs 2024 Changes
    Dired as a cross-platform file manager. I used to use Midnight Commander but I found it buggy in the end (on MacOS). Since investing time in learning dired it's good enough. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • OpenBSD Desktop
    Midnight Commander is a good TUI file manager. https://midnight-commander.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Antonmedv/walk: Terminal file manager
    Was there something before https://midnight-commander.org/ or was that the OG? - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • How to move a directory to ../ if there is a directory with same name?
    Just use mc (midnight commander) it not only is a terminal based file manager but it will give you the command lines used to do so GNU MIDNIGHT COMMANDER. Source: about 3 years ago
  • What's that email client doing here?
    Given that you can run shells in Emacs since those are text too, Emacs ends up becoming almost like a Lisp-powered tmux or mc. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

Codekeeper mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: What code escrow companies do you recommend?
    I had a similar requirement recently and ended up going with CodeKeeper (https://codekeeper.co/), mainly because they had a portal that seemed mostly self-serve. Because they are based in The Hague, and because my client had domestic restrictions, I also had to add the US-only storage option. Their pricing was also a factor in my decision. YMMV. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Midnight Commander and Codekeeper, you can also consider the following products

Double Commander - Double Commander is a cross-platform open source file manager with two panels side by side.

PRAXIS Technology Escrow - PRAXIS Technology Escrow is a platform that provides Software Escrow service to make it easy for you to keep your investment away from risk.

FreeCommander - FreeCommander is an easy-to-use alternative to the standard windows file manager. The program helps you with daily work in Windows. Here you can find all the necessary functions to manage your data stock.

Rightsline - Rightsline consolidates your entire data and contracts in one place.

Total Commander - A Shareware file manager for Windowsยฎ 95/98/ME/NT/2000/XP/Vista/7, and Windowsยฎ 3.1.

ANAQUA Corporate - ANAQUA Corporate is a property management software that helps to streamline its operations and offers strategic decision making.