Software Alternatives & Startups

Microsoft SQL Server Compact VS Database.com

Compare Microsoft SQL Server Compact VS Database.com and see what are their differences

Microsoft SQL Server Compact

Bring Microsoft SQL Server 2017 to the platform of your choice. Use SQL Server 2017 on Windows, Linux, and Docker containers.

Rating
0 reviews
Database.com

Enterprise cloud database

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

NoSQL Databases popularity
88% vs 12%
alternatives listed
44 vs 4

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Microsoft SQL Server Compact
Database.com
Website microsoft.com database.com
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Microsoft SQL Server Compact 5 features
Database.com 5 features
  • Lightweight and Portable
    Microsoft SQL Server Compact is a lightweight database solution that can be easily deployed with applications, making it ideal for desktop, mobile, and small-scale web applications.
  • In-Process Database Engine
    The database engine runs within the application process, which eliminates the need for a separate server, reducing system complexity and resource usage.
  • Zero-configuration Needed
    SQL Server Compact requires no installation or configuration, which simplifies deployment for developers and end users alike.
  • Free to Use
    It is free, which makes it a cost-effective solution for small projects or for inclusion in commercial and non-commercial applications.
  • Integration with Visual Studio
    Offers seamless integration with Microsoft Visual Studio, providing an easy-to-use development experience for .NET developers.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Features
    It lacks some advanced features found in other editions of SQL Server, such as stored procedures, triggers, and advanced security features, which may be necessary for more complex applications.
  • Not Suitable for Large Applications
    Designed for smaller, single-user applications, SQL Server Compact is not suitable for large, multi-user, or distributed database scenarios.
  • End of Life Considerations
    With advancements in other Microsoft data solutions and no major updates being released for SQL Server Compact, developers may need to consider future migration strategies.
  • Limited Storage Capacity
    The maximum database size is constrained, limiting its ability to handle extensive data storage needs.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Being an older technology, it might face compatibility issues with newer technologies and platforms.
  • Scalability
    Database.com offers scalable storage and performance, accommodating increasing data volumes without compromising speed or efficiency.
  • Cloud-Based
    Being cloud-based means that users can access Database.com from anywhere, facilitating remote work and collaboration without the need for local infrastructure.
  • Integration
    Database.com integrates well with other Salesforce services and many third-party applications, allowing users to create seamless workflows and unified systems.
  • Security
    Offers robust security features, including data encryption and user authentication, to protect sensitive information and ensure compliance with various standards.
  • Developer Friendly
    Provides tools and APIs that are friendly to developers, enabling the easy creation, manipulation, and management of databases within the platform.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Pricing can be prohibitive, especially for small businesses, given the costs associated with scalable cloud services and additional features.
  • Complexity
    The setup and management may be complex, requiring a learning curve and possibly dedicated teams to manage and maintain the database environment.
  • Dependency on Salesforce
    Deep integration with Salesforce might be a downside for organizations not already using Salesforce, increasing dependency on one vendor for cloud solutions.
  • Limited Offline Access
    As a fully cloud-based solution, offline access is limited, which may pose a challenge for operations in areas with unreliable internet connectivity.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Microsoft SQL Server Compact
Database.com
88% 88%
12% 12%
0% 0%
100% 100%
88% 88%
12% 12%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Microsoft SQL Server Compact and Database.com. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Alternatives to Microsoft SQL Server Compact and Database.com

When comparing Microsoft SQL Server Compact and Database.com, you can also consider the following products.