The game dev environment they’re talking about is MakeCode Arcade. I’m also a big fan of it. There are a number of little handheld gadgets that you can use with MakeCode—scroll down on the homepage and there’s a section that shows them all: https://arcade.makecode.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

I recently installed Ubuntu on a little Geekom mini PC for my 6 and 8 year olds to share. So far my 6 yo isn’t too into it, but her older sister mostly uses it for the games I’ve put onto it through Epic and Steam and programming using MakeCode, mostly for Arcade (https://arcade.makecode.com) (I have a couple of micro:bit-based handheld shields) and more recently getting into the awesomely simple networking that... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

Alternatively, get her an emulator of an old 8 or 16 bit system, I started coding at the age of 10 in these systems, with books that were oriented for kids. https://www.atariarchives.org/ http://redparsley.blogspot.com/2016/08/input-magazine-retrospective.html https://archive.org/details/input-hi-01 Or if you prefer something more up to date, https://arcade.makecode.com/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

Https://arcade.makecode.com/ Is great fun to use and made for kids. The forum (forum.makecode.com) is well moderated and safe too. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

I'm not sure how this reduces the barrier to game developement. There are already lots of free assets and game engines designed for making arcade games that are a lot easier then say Unity or Unreal. Like https://arcade.makecode.com/ or https://microstudio.dev/ or https://scratch.mit.edu/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

The architecture is a fairly straightforward WebAssembly-native monolithic kernel. Most of the complexities come from making things work well within the browser constraints for real world, large apps. We have quite a bit of experience on the topic however, these are previous projects of ours: WebVM (https://webvm.io): x86 Debian shell running client-side in the browser via x86 -> WebAssembly JIT compilation... - Source: Hacker News / 26 days ago

Thanks :-) We have been building WebAssembly-based products for a while now, so for us it's second nature. But I think you are right, most developers, even experienced ones, have not yet come to grasp the fully capabilities of the Web platform in conjunction with WebAssembly. You might find previous projects from us also interesting: * WebVM (https://webvm.io): x86 virtualization in the browser. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago

A somewhat better solution via tailnet you can find in https://webvm.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

Hello HN community, I am very happy to share with you BrowserPod for Node.js - a sandboxed Node runtime, compiled to WebAssembly, that runs completely in the your browser. BrowserPod builds on our previous work on WebAssembly virtualization, see WebVM (https://webvm.io) as an example. The environment is not a simple set of shims, but the "real" Node.js, including support for filesystem, multiple processes and... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

We use WebAssembly aggressively at Leaning Technologies across our tools. WebAssembly makes it possible to: * Run x86 binaries in the browser via JIT-ting (https://webvm.io) * Run Java applications in the browser, including Minecraft (https://browsercraft.cheerpj.com) * Run node.js containers in the browser (https://browserpod.io) It's an incredibly powerful tool, but very much a power-user one. Expecting your... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago